Final Issues. Endings in Modern Intellectual History

Histories of political, intellectual, literary and aesthetic movements are often told through documents of their beginnings: Manifestos, declarations, and programs testify to what groups, avant-gardes or collectives stand for, what they want to achieve, and what they oppose. The importance of ‘beginnings’ and the practices and narratives they entail have been emphasized in cultural theory and historiography alike: “A beginning not only creates but is its own method because it has intention,” Edward Said wrote in his study Beginnings: Intention and Method in 1975.

Yet, in contrast to the clarity of beginnings, end(ing)s seem much harder to grasp. This is not least due to the fact that the late and final stages of political-intellectual projects are often underdocumented, as many avant-gardes and collectives in history disperse, fade out, or lose their social and intellectual coherence gradually. Studies on endings, understood as a set of intentional practices and politics are thus rare to find. One example has been given by French sociologist René Lourau, who in 1980 collected final documents from a variety of groups for his book on the Autodissolution des avant-gardes: from Dada to the Situationists, from the Sex Pistols to numerous journals and magazines, Lourau tried to show how and to what purpose endings were narrated and justified, and how they served as communicative acts in their political and cultural contexts.

Starting from such observations, the workshop focuses on concrete textual and medial representations of endings in modern cultural and intellectual history. Our working hypothesis is that materialized representations of endings give expression to temporal experiences of individuals and collectives, shedding light on the self-given interpretations of their own past, present, or future afterlives. Hence, the workshop aims to transfer Edward Said’s questions on beginning—on ‘what is special about beginning as an activity or a moment or a place’—to its opposite, asking how we can reconstruct endings, theorize them and read them as interventions into the present.

The workshop will be held in cooperation with the Cluster of Excellence 2020 Temporal Communities: Doing Literature in a Global Perspective.

Program

Thursday, 10 Oct 2024

14.00

• Yvonne Albers (EXC 2020/FU Berlin), Moritz Neuffer (ZfL): Introduction

14.30
Chair: Patrick Eiden-Offe (ZfL)

• Julia Soytek (Universität Hamburg): “Invest Your Money in Dada!” Dadaist Endings between Dissolution and Durability
• Johanne Mohs (Berlin): Never-ending Story? Oulipo and the End of its Offshoot ALAMO

16.30
Chair: Yvonne Albers (EXC 2020/FU Berlin)

• Eric-John Russell (Universität Potsdam): “The Situationist International spoke, and history confirmed it”
• Morten Paul (Kulturwissenschaftliches Institut Essen): “We must Get Rid of Freudo-Marxism”. Ends of the Repressive Hypothesis, ca. 1976

18.15 Keynote
Chair: Moritz Neuffer (ZfL)

• Kate Eichhorn (Emerson College, Boston): Dispatches from the After-Revolution

Friday, 11 Oct 2024

9.30
Chair: N.N.

• Ivana Perica (ZfL): “No end, but a new beginning”: Oto Bihalji-Merin as Editor of a State-Representative Art Magazine in post-war Yugoslavia
• Mariam Elashmawy (FU Berlin): A Stillborn Relaunch: Narrating al-Ma‘rifa and its Endings

11.15
Chair: N.N.

• Gregory Jones-Katz (Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main): Imagined Deaths of Theory in America
• Simon Godart (EXC 2020/FU Berlin): On the end of Poetik & Hermeneutik

14.00
Chair: Hagen Verleger (Kiel/Berlin)

• Anouk Luhn (EXC 2020/FU Berlin): Ending Change
• Julian Klinner (Universität Tübingen): Daily Life has Grown Up. Der Alltag and its Final Issue