Direkt zur Hauptnavigation springen Direkt zum Inhalt springen
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 5 von 5.

  1. A comment on Alesina, Miano and Stancheva (2023)
    Autor*in: Albrecht, Sabina; Collins, Jason; Gauriot, Romain; Wu, Fannie
    Erschienen: June 2023
    Verlag:  Institute for Replication, Essen, Germany

    Alesina et al. (2023) examine how people perceive the number and characteristics of migrants and how those perceptions affect their support for redistribution. They find that respondents from the United States, United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, Germany... mehr

    Zugang:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)

    Standort:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Signatur:
    DS 831
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    Alesina et al. (2023) examine how people perceive the number and characteristics of migrants and how those perceptions affect their support for redistribution. They find that respondents from the United States, United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, Germany and France markedly overestimate the share of immigrants in each country, with the average respondent in all countries except Sweden overestimating by more than a factor of two. We reproduce these results using the original code and data and test the robustness by (i) including participants excluded for time to complete the survey, (ii) extending the analysis of misperceptions to all survey respondents, and (iii) using alternative authoritative estimates of the proportion of immigrants. We find that these checks marginally change the estimates of the size of the misperception but do not change the conclusions to be drawn from the analysis. Alesina et al. (2023) also test the effect on support for redistribution of showing videos on immigrant characteristics. We computationally reproduced the treatment effects on support for redistribution.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Beteiligt: Alesina, Alberto (VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks); Miano, Armando (VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks); Stantcheva, Stefanie (VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks)
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    hdl: 10419/272841
    Schriftenreihe: I4R discussion paper series / Institute for Replication ; no. 40
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 11 Seiten)
  2. Endogenous tracking
    sorting and peer effects
    Autor*in: Chernulich, Aleksei; Gauriot, Romain; Min, Daehong
    Erschienen: [2023]
    Verlag:  New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE

    Zugang:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)

    Standort:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Signatur:
    VS 857
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Auflage/Ausgabe: This version: January 9, 2023
    Schriftenreihe: Division of Social Science working paper series ; working paper # 0084 (January 2023)
    Schlagworte: Peer effects; sorting; educational tracking; socioeconomic inequality
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 50 Seiten), Illustrationen
  3. Altruism or diminishing marginal utility?
    Autor*in: Gauriot, Romain; Heger, Stephanie A.; Slonim, Robert
    Erschienen: August 2018
    Verlag:  IZA, Bonn, Germany

    We challenge a commonly used assumption in the literature on social preferences and show that this assumption leads to significantly biased estimates of the social preference parameter. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we demonstrate that the... mehr

    Standort:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Signatur:
    DS 4 (11721)
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    We challenge a commonly used assumption in the literature on social preferences and show that this assumption leads to significantly biased estimates of the social preference parameter. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we demonstrate that the literature's common restrictions on the curvature of the decision-makers utility function can dramatically bias the altruism parameter. We show that this is particularly problematic when comparing altruism between groups with well-documented differences in risk aversion or diminishing marginal utility, i.e., men versus women, giving motivated by pure versus warm glow motives, and wealthy versus poor.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    hdl: 10419/185181
    Schriftenreihe: Discussion paper series / IZA ; no. 11721
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 44 Seiten), Illustrationen
  4. Eliciting preferences for risk and altruism
    experimental evidence
    Autor*in: Gauriot, Romain; Heger, Stephanie A.; Slonim, Robert
    Erschienen: October 2022
    Verlag:  CESifo, Center for Economic Studies & Ifo Institute, Munich, Germany

    We apply the basic lessons and insights learned in the elicitation and estimation of risk and time preferences literature to the literature on social preferences. Following Andersen et al. (2008), we design a laboratory experiment to jointly elicit... mehr

    Zugang:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)

    Standort:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Signatur:
    DS 63
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    We apply the basic lessons and insights learned in the elicitation and estimation of risk and time preferences literature to the literature on social preferences. Following Andersen et al. (2008), we design a laboratory experiment to jointly elicit risk preferences and preferences for altruism. Consistent with theory, we find that the standard simplifying assumptions about risk preferences lead to significantly biased estimates of altruism. This is particularly problematic when comparing altruism across relevant sub-groups, such as gender and wealth, leading to possibly erroneous conclusions about which is the more generous sex and the self-regarding rich.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    hdl: 10419/267226
    Schriftenreihe: CESifo working paper ; no. 9993 (2022)
    Schlagworte: altruism; risk aversion; experiment
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 38 Seiten), Illustrationen
  5. Mass reproducibility and replicability
    a new hope
    Autor*in: Brodeur, Abel; Mikola, Derek; Cook, Nikolai; Brailey, Thomas; Briggs, Ryan C.; Gendre, Alexandra de; Dupraz, Yannick; Fiala, Lenka; Gabani, Jacopo; Gauriot, Romain; Haddad, Joanne; Lima, Goncalo; Ankel-Peters, Jörg; Dreber, Anna
    Erschienen: April 2024
    Verlag:  Institute for Replication, Essen, Germany

    This study pushes our understanding of research reliability by reproducing and replicating claims from 110 papers in leading economic and political science journals. The analysis involves computational reproducibility checks and robustness... mehr

    Zugang:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)

    Standort:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Signatur:
    DS 831
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    This study pushes our understanding of research reliability by reproducing and replicating claims from 110 papers in leading economic and political science journals. The analysis involves computational reproducibility checks and robustness assessments. It reveals several patterns. First, we uncover a high rate of fully computationally reproducible results (over 85%). Second, excluding minor issues like missing packages or broken pathways, we uncover coding errors for about 25% of studies, with some studies containing multiple errors. Third, we test the robustness of the results to 5,511 re-analyses. We find a robustness reproducibility of about 70%. Robustness reproducibility rates are relatively higher for re-analyses that introduce new data and lower for re-analyses that change the sample or the definition of the dependent variable. Fourth, 52% of re-analysis effect size estimates are smaller than the original published estimates and the average statistical significance of a re-analysis is 77% of the original. Lastly, we rely on six teams of researchers working independently to answer eight additional research questions on the determinants of robustness reproducibility. Most teams find a negative relationship between replicators' experience and reproducibility, while finding no relationship between reproducibility and the provision of intermediate or even raw data combined with the necessary cleaning codes.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    hdl: 10419/289437
    Schriftenreihe: I4R discussion paper series / Institute for Replication ; no. 107
    Schlagworte: Reproduction; Replication; Research Transparency; Open Science; Economics; Political Science
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 250 Seiten), Illustrationen