Direkt zur Hauptnavigation springen Direkt zum Inhalt springen
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Filtern nach
Aktive Filter
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 9 von 9.

  1. Counterfeiting Shakespeare
    evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye
    Autor*in: Vickers, Brian
    Erschienen: 2002
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These... mehr

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Bamberg
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These attributions have been accepted into certain major editions of Shakespeare's works but Brian Vickers argues that both attributions rest on superficial verbal parallels; both use too small a sample, ignore negative evidence, and violate basic principles in authorship studies. Through a fresh examination of the evidence, Professor Vickers shows that neither poem has the stylistic and imaginative qualities we associate with Shakespeare. In other words, they are 'counterfeits', in the sense of anonymously authored works wrongly presented as Shakespeare's. He argues that the poet and dramatist John Ford wrote the Elegye: its poetical language (vocabulary, syntax, prosody) is indistinguishable from Ford's, and it contains several hundred close parallels with his work. By combining linguistic and statistical analysis this book makes an important contribution to authorship studies

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9780511484049
    Weitere Identifier:
    RVK Klassifikation: HI 3327
    Schlagworte: Poetry / Authorship; Autorschaft
    Weitere Schlagworte: W. S. / Funerall elegye in memory of the late virtuous master William Peeter of Whipton neere Exetour; Shakespeare, William / 1564-1616 / Authorship; Ford, John / 1586-approximately 1640 / Authorship; Ford, John (1586-1639); Shakespeare, William (1564-1616)
    Umfang: 1 online resource (xxvii, 568 pages)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)
  2. Counterfeiting Shakespeare
    evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye
    Autor*in: Vickers, Brian
    Erschienen: 2002
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Standort:
    Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Amberg-Weiden / Hochschulbibliothek Amberg
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Amberg-Weiden, Hochschulbibliothek, Standort Weiden
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 0511066716; 0511068840; 0511118430; 9780511066719; 9780511068843; 9780511118432
    RVK Klassifikation: HI 3327
    Schlagworte: LITERARY CRITICISM / Shakespeare; DRAMA / Shakespeare; Funerall elegye in memory of the late virtuous master William Peeter of Whipton neere Exetour (W. S.); Authorship; Poetry / Authorship; Poetry; Autorschaft
    Weitere Schlagworte: Ford, John / approximately 1586- / Authorship; Ford, John / 1586-approximately 1640; Shakespeare, William / 1564-1616; W. S.: Funerall elegye in memory of the late virtuous master William Peeter of Whipton neere Exetour; Shakespeare, William (1564-1616); Ford, John (1586-approximately 1640); Ford, John (1586-1639); Shakespeare, William (1564-1616)
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (xxvii, 568 pages)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Includes bibliographical references (pages 554-562) and index

    Cover; Half-title; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; Preface; Tables; Abbreviations and note on references; 1. JOURNALS AND BOOKS; 2. WORKS BY WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE; 3. WORKS BY JOHN FORD; PROLOGUE Gary Taylor finds a poem; READING THE POEM; VERBAL PARALLELS; LITERARY HISTORY; SHAKESPEARE'S WORDS: SHAKESPEARE'S MEANINGS?; ATTRIBUTING AND EMENDING; RESPONDING TO CRITICISM; CHAPTER 1 'W. S.' and 'Elegye' for William Peter; CHAPTER 2 Parallels? Plagiarisms?; CHAPTER 3 Vocabulary and diction; CHAPTER 4 Grammar: 'the Shakespearean "who" '; CHAPTER 5 Prosody, punctuation, pause patterns

    Brian Vickers examines the issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. Shakespeare's authorship has been claimed for two poems, 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. Vickers shows that neither has the requisite stylistic and imaginative qualities. In other words, they are 'counterfeits', in the sense of anonymously authored works wrongly presented as Shakespeare's. He identifies John Ford as author of the Elegye
  3. Counterfeiting Shakespeare
    evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye
    Autor*in: Vickers, Brian
    Erschienen: 2002
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Standort:
    Kunsthistorisches Institut in Florenz, Max-Planck-Institut, Bibliothek
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 0521772435
    Schlagworte: Poetry; Autorschaft
    Weitere Schlagworte: W. S. (fl. 1612): Funerall elegye in memory of the late virtuous master William Peeter of Whipton neere Exetour; Shakespeare, William (1564-1616); Ford, John (1586-ca. 1640); Ford, John (1586-1639); Shakespeare, William (1564-1616)
    Umfang: xxvii, 568 p
    Bemerkung(en):

    Includes bibliographical references (p. 554-562) and index
  4. Counterfeiting Shakespeare
    evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye
    Autor*in: Vickers, Brian
    Erschienen: 2002
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These... mehr

    Standort:
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Unter den Linden
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These attributions have been accepted into certain major editions of Shakespeare's works but Brian Vickers argues that both attributions rest on superficial verbal parallels; both use too small a sample, ignore negative evidence, and violate basic principles in authorship studies. Through a fresh examination of the evidence, Professor Vickers shows that neither poem has the stylistic and imaginative qualities we associate with Shakespeare. In other words, they are 'counterfeits', in the sense of anonymously authored works wrongly presented as Shakespeare's. He argues that the poet and dramatist John Ford wrote the Elegye: its poetical language (vocabulary, syntax, prosody) is indistinguishable from Ford's, and it contains several hundred close parallels with his work. By combining linguistic and statistical analysis this book makes an important contribution to authorship studies

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
    Quelle: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9780511484049
    Weitere Identifier:
    Schlagworte: Poetry; W. S ; Funerall elegye in memory of the late virtuous master William Peeter of Whipton neere Exetour; Shakespeare, William ; 1564-1616 ; Authorship; Ford, John ; 1586-approximately 1640 ; Authorship; Poetry ; Authorship
    Weitere Schlagworte: Ford, John (1586-approximately 1640); Shakespeare, William (1564-1616); W. S: Funerall elegye in memory of the late virtuous master William Peeter of Whipton neere Exetour
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (xxvii, 568 pages), digital, PDF file(s)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)

    Prologue: Gary Taylor finds a poem -- pt. I. Donald Foster's 'Shakespearean' Construct. 1. 'W. S.' and the Elegye for William Peter. 2. Parallels? Plagiarisms? 3. Vocabulary and diction. 4. Grammar: 'the Shakespearean "who"'. 5. Prosody, punctuation, pause patterns. 6. Rhetoric: 'the Shakespearean "hendiadys"'. 7. Statistics and inference. 8. A poem 'indistinguishable from Shakespeare'? -- pt. II. John Ford's 'Funerall Elegye'. 9. Ford's writing career: poet, moralist, playwright. 10. Ford and the Elegye's 'Shakespearean diction'. 11. The Funerall Elegye in its Fordian context. Epilogue: The politics of attribution -- App. I. The text of A Funerall Elegye -- App. II. Verbal parallels between A Funerall Elegye and Ford's poems.
  5. Counterfeiting Shakespeare
    evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye
    Autor*in: Vickers, Brian
    Erschienen: 2002
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These... mehr

    Zugang:

    Standort:
    Universität Frankfurt, Elektronische Ressourcen
    Signatur:
    /
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Gießen
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These attributions have been accepted into certain major editions of Shakespeare's works but Brian Vickers argues that both attributions rest on superficial verbal parallels; both use too small a sample, ignore negative evidence, and violate basic principles in authorship studies. Through a fresh examination of the evidence, Professor Vickers shows that neither poem has the stylistic and imaginative qualities we associate with Shakespeare. In other words, they are 'counterfeits', in the sense of anonymously authored works wrongly presented as Shakespeare's. He argues that the poet and dramatist John Ford wrote the Elegye: its poetical language (vocabulary, syntax, prosody) is indistinguishable from Ford's, and it contains several hundred close parallels with his work. By combining linguistic and statistical analysis this book makes an important contribution to authorship studies.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9780511484049
    RVK Klassifikation: HI 2235 ; HI 3327 ; HI 3315
    Schlagworte: Autorschaft
    Weitere Schlagworte: Shakespeare, William (1564-1616); Ford, John (1586-1639)
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (xxvii, 568 pages)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)
  6. Counterfeiting Shakespeare
    evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye
    Autor*in: Vickers, Brian
    Erschienen: 2002
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK [u.a.] ; EBSCO Industries, Inc., Birmingham, AL, USA

    Brian Vickers examines the issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. Shakespeare's authorship has been claimed for two poems, 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. Vickers shows that neither has the requisite stylistic and... mehr

    Standort:
    Bibliothek der Hochschule Mainz, Untergeschoss
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    Brian Vickers examines the issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. Shakespeare's authorship has been claimed for two poems, 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. Vickers shows that neither has the requisite stylistic and imaginative qualities. In other words, they are 'counterfeits', in the sense of anonymously authored works wrongly presented as Shakespeare's. He identifies John Ford as author of the Elegye.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 0511066716; 9780511066719; 0511068840; 9780511068843; 0511118430; 9780511118432; 9780521772433; 0521772435; 9780511484049; 0511484046; 1280160195; 9781280160196
    RVK Klassifikation: HI 2235 ; HI 3327 ; HI 3315
    Schlagworte: Autorschaft
    Weitere Schlagworte: Shakespeare, William (1564-1616); Ford, John (1586-1639)
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (xxvii, 568 pages)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Includes bibliographical references (pages 554-562) and index
  7. Counterfeiting Shakespeare
    evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye
    Autor*in: Vickers, Brian
    Erschienen: 2002
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Brian Vickers examines the issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. Shakespeare's authorship has been claimed for two poems, 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. Vickers shows that neither has the requisite stylistic and... mehr

    Standort:
    Hochschulbibliothek Friedensau
    Signatur:
    Online-Ressource
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    Brian Vickers examines the issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. Shakespeare's authorship has been claimed for two poems, 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. Vickers shows that neither has the requisite stylistic and imaginative qualities. In other words, they are 'counterfeits', in the sense of anonymously authored works wrongly presented as Shakespeare's. He identifies John Ford as author of the Elegye

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 0521772435
    Schlagworte: Poetry
    Weitere Schlagworte: Ford, John (1586-ca. 1640); Shakespeare, William (1564-1616); W. S: Funerall elegye in memory of the late virtuous master William Peeter of Whipton neere Exetour
    Umfang: Online-Ressource (xxvii, 568 p), 24 cm
    Bemerkung(en):

    Includes bibliographical references (p. 554-562) and index

    Electronic reproduction; Available via World Wide Web

    Cover; Half-title; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; Preface; Tables; Abbreviations and note on references; 1. JOURNALS AND BOOKS; 2. WORKS BY WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE; 3. WORKS BY JOHN FORD; PROLOGUE Gary Taylor finds a poem; READING THE POEM; VERBAL PARALLELS; LITERARY HISTORY; SHAKESPEARE'S WORDS: SHAKESPEARE'S MEANINGS?; ATTRIBUTING AND EMENDING; RESPONDING TO CRITICISM; Shall I sue, and not rue my proceeding?; PART I Donald Foster's 'Shakespearean' construct; CHAPTER 1 'W. S.' and 'Elegye' for William Peter; CHAPTER 2 Parallels? Plagiarisms?; CHAPTER 3 Vocabulary and diction

    CHAPTER 4 Grammar: 'the Shakespearean "who" 'CHAPTER 5 Prosody, punctuation, pause patterns; CHAPTER 6 Rhetoric: 'the Shakespearean "hendiadys" '; CHAPTER 7 Statistics and inference; CHAPTER 8 A poem 'indistinguishable from Shakespeare'?; GENRE AND ARGUMENT; DICTION; SYNTAX; PART II John Ford's 'Funerall Elegye'; CHAPTER 9 Ford's writing career: poet, moralist, playwright; CHAPTER 10 Ford and the 'Elegye' 's 'Shakespearean diction'; LATINISMS AND WORD-FORMATION; VERBAL PREFERENCES; SYNTAX; PROSODY; RHETORIC; CHAPTER 11 The 'Funerall Elegye' in its Fordian context

    EPILOGUE The Politics of AttributionUSING THE MEDIA; DEALING WITH CRITICS; AUTHORSHIP STUDIES AND A 'CONTRITE FALLIBILISM'; Appendices; APPENDIX I The text of 'A Funerall Elegye'; A FUNERALL ELEGYE; APPENDIX II Verbal parallels between 'A Funerall Elegye' and Ford's poems; VERSE LINES BEGINNING WITH A PRESENT PARTICIPLE; 'Fames Memoriall'; 'A Funerall Elegye'; 'Christes Bloodie Sweat'; 'Fames Memoriall'; 'Funerall Elegye'; 'Christes Bloodie Sweat'; 'Fames Memoriall'; 'Funerall Elegye'; 'Christes Bloodie Sweat'; 'Fames Memoriall'; 'Funerall Elegye'; 'Christes Bloodie Sweat'; 'Fames Memoriall'

    'Funerall Elegye''Christes Bloodie Sweat'; 'Funerall Elegye'; 'Christes Bloodie Sweat'; 'Funerall Elegye'; 'Christes Bloodie Sweat'; 'Fames Memoriall'; 'Funerall Elegye'; 'Christes Bloodie Sweat'; APPENDIX III Establishing Ford's canon; THE PLAYS IN QUESTION; ATTRIBUTION CRITERIA: VERBAL PARALLELS; VOCABULARY, LINGUISTIC PREFERENCES; Notes; PROLOGUE. GARY TAYLOR FINDS A POEM; 1 'W. S.' AND THE 'ELEGYE' FOR WILLIAM PETER; 2 PARALLELS? PLAGIARISM?; 3 VOCABULARY AND DICTION; 4 GRAMMAR: 'THE SHAKESPEAREAN ""WHO"" '; 5 PROSODY, PUNCTUATION, PAUSE-PATTERNS

    6 RHETORIC: 'THE SHAKESPEAREAN ""HENDIADYS"" ' 7 STATISTICS AND INFERENCE; 8 A POEM 'INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM SHAKESPEARE'?; 9 FORD'S WRITING CAREER: POET, MORALIST, PLAYWRIGHT; 10 FORD AND THE 'ELEGYE' 'S SHAKESPEAREAN DICTION'; 11 THE 'FUNERALL ELEGYE' IN ITS FORDIAN CONTEXT; EPILOGUE, THE POLITICS OF ATTRIBUTION; APPENDIX 111: ESTABLISHING FORD'S CANON; Bibliography; Index
  8. William Shakespeare
    The Critical Heritage Volume 3 1733-1752
    Autor*in: Vickers, Brian
    Erschienen: 2002
    Verlag:  Taylor and Francis, Hoboken

    <I>The Critical Heritage</I> gathers together a large body of critical sources on major figures in literature. Each volume presents contemporary responses to a writer's work, enabling student and researcher to read the material themselves mehr

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Erfurt / Forschungsbibliothek Gotha, Universitätsbibliothek Erfurt
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt / Zentrale
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Kiel, Zentralbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Hochschulbibliothek Friedensau
    Signatur:
    Online-Ressource
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    The Critical Heritage gathers together a large body of critical sources on major figures in literature. Each volume presents contemporary responses to a writer's work, enabling student and researcher to read the material themselves

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9780415134064
    Schriftenreihe: The Critical Heritage Series
    Umfang: Online-Ressource (500 p)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Description based upon print version of record

    Book Cover; Title; Contents; PREFACE; INTRODUCTION; NOTE ON THE TEXT; DAVID MALLET, textual criticism attacked, 1733; WILLIAM POPPLE on Polonius, May 1735; AARON HILL on King Lear and Hamlet, October 1735; GEORGE STUBBES on Hamlet, 1736; ALEXANDER POPE, conversations, 1736; Unsigned essays, Shakespeare and the actors, December 1736; February, March 1737; THOMAS BIRCH and WILLIAM WARBURTON on Shakespeare's life and works, 1739; WILLIAM SMITH, Shakespeare and the Sublime, 1739; COLLEY CIBBER, Shakespeare in the theatre, 1740; THOMAS GRAY, Shakespeare's language, April 1742

    THOMAS COOKE, a panegyric to Shakespeare, 1743WILLIAM COLLINS, a panegyric to Shakespeare, 1743; SIR THOMAS HANMER, preface to Shakespeare, 1744; JOSEPH WARTON, Shakespeare: Nature's child, 1744; CORBYN MORRIS, Falstaff's humour, 1744; DAVID GARRICK, How not to act Macbeth, 1744; DAVID GARRICK, from his presentation of Macbeth, 1744; DAVID GARRICK, from his presentation of Othello, 1745; COLLEY CIBBER, adaptation of King John, 1745; Unsigned essay against Cibber's King John, 1745; ELIZAH HAYWOOD on the adaptations of Romeo and Juliet, 1745; SAMUEL JOHNSON on Macbeth, 1745

    MARK AKENSIDE, Shakespeare weighed and measured, December 1746WILLIAM GUTHRIE on Shakespearian tragedy, 1747; Unsigned essay on jealousy in Othello, August 1747; SAMUEL FOOTE, Shakespeare and the actors, 1747; SAMUEL FOOTE on the Unities, 1747; WILLIAM WARBURTON, edition of Shakespeare, 1747; Unsigned essay, Shakespeare the dramatist, 1747; PETER WHALLEY on Shakespeare's learning, 1748; JOHN UPTON on Shakespeare, 1748; SAMUEL RICHARDSON on poetic justice, 1748; Unsigned essay on Shakespeare's morality compared with Otway's, November, December 1748

    DAVID GARRICK, adaptation of Romeo and Juliet, 1748JOHN HOLT, Remarks on 'The Tempest', 1749; MARK AKENSIDE, Shakespeare attacks Francophilia, 1749; RICHARD HURD on Shakespeare and ordinary life, 1749; DAVID GARRICK on Shakespeare's temple, September 1750; Unsigned essay, Shakespeare and the rules, 1750; 'SIR' JOHN HILL, Shakespeare and the actors, 1750; ARTHUR MURPHY on Romeo and Juliet, October 1750; Unsigned poem, 'Shakespeare's Ghost', June 1750; THOMAS SEWARD on Shakespeare, 1750; THOMAS EDWARDS, Warburton exposed, 1750; RICHARD HURD on Shakespeare, 1751

    SAMUEL JOHNSON on Shakespeare, November 1750 September, October 1751; Unsigned essay on jealousy in Othello, November 1751; WILLIAM MASON, a proposal to revive the Chorus, 1751; THOMAS GRAY, the Chorus rejected, c. December 1751; ARTHUR MURPHY, the Chorus rejected, September 1752; Unsigned essay on Hamlet, 1752; BONNELL THORNTON on Shakespeare, February, March 1752; WILLIAM DODD on Shakespeare, 1752; A SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY; INDEX
  9. Counterfeiting Shakespeare
    evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye
    Autor*in: Vickers, Brian
    Erschienen: 2002
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These... mehr

    Standort:
    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    Signatur:
    E-Book CUP HSFK
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Potsdamer Straße
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Technische Universität Chemnitz, Universitätsbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    E-Book CUP HSFK
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt / Zentrale
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Bibliothek - Niedersächsische Landesbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Medien- und Informationszentrum, Universitätsbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Universitätsbibliothek
    Signatur:
    eBook Cambridge
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Bibliotheks-und Informationssystem der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (BIS)
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Rostock
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Württembergische Landesbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek der Eberhard Karls Universität
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

     

    'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These attributions have been accepted into certain major editions of Shakespeare's works but Brian Vickers argues that both attributions rest on superficial verbal parallels; both use too small a sample, ignore negative evidence, and violate basic principles in authorship studies. Through a fresh examination of the evidence, Professor Vickers shows that neither poem has the stylistic and imaginative qualities we associate with Shakespeare. In other words, they are 'counterfeits', in the sense of anonymously authored works wrongly presented as Shakespeare's. He argues that the poet and dramatist John Ford wrote the Elegye: its poetical language (vocabulary, syntax, prosody) is indistinguishable from Ford's, and it contains several hundred close parallels with his work. By combining linguistic and statistical analysis this book makes an important contribution to authorship studies

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
    Quelle: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9780511484049
    Weitere Identifier:
    Schlagworte: Poetry; W. S ; Funerall elegye in memory of the late virtuous master William Peeter of Whipton neere Exetour; Shakespeare, William ; 1564-1616 ; Authorship; Ford, John ; 1586-approximately 1640 ; Authorship; Poetry ; Authorship
    Weitere Schlagworte: Ford, John (1586-approximately 1640); Shakespeare, William (1564-1616); W. S: Funerall elegye in memory of the late virtuous master William Peeter of Whipton neere Exetour
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (xxvii, 568 pages), digital, PDF file(s)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)

    Prologue: Gary Taylor finds a poem -- pt. I. Donald Foster's 'Shakespearean' Construct. 1. 'W. S.' and the Elegye for William Peter. 2. Parallels? Plagiarisms? 3. Vocabulary and diction. 4. Grammar: 'the Shakespearean "who"'. 5. Prosody, punctuation, pause patterns. 6. Rhetoric: 'the Shakespearean "hendiadys"'. 7. Statistics and inference. 8. A poem 'indistinguishable from Shakespeare'? -- pt. II. John Ford's 'Funerall Elegye'. 9. Ford's writing career: poet, moralist, playwright. 10. Ford and the Elegye's 'Shakespearean diction'. 11. The Funerall Elegye in its Fordian context. Epilogue: The politics of attribution -- App. I. The text of A Funerall Elegye -- App. II. Verbal parallels between A Funerall Elegye and Ford's poems.