Direkt zur Hauptnavigation springen Direkt zum Inhalt springen
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 5 von 5.

  1. Epistemology’s Prime Evils
    Autor*in: Bondy, Patrick
    Erschienen: 2021

    Abstract This essay addresses what we can call epistemology’s Prime Evils. These are the three demons epistemologists have conjured that are the most troublesome and the most difficult to dispel: Descartes’ classic demon; Lehrer and Cohen’s New Evil... mehr

    Standort:
    Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Index theologicus der Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    Abstract This essay addresses what we can call epistemology’s Prime Evils. These are the three demons epistemologists have conjured that are the most troublesome and the most difficult to dispel: Descartes’ classic demon; Lehrer and Cohen’s New Evil Demon; and Schaffer’s Debasing Demon. These demons threaten the epistemic statuses of our beliefs—in particular, the statuses of knowledge and justification—and they present challenges for our theories of these epistemic statuses. This paper explains the key features of these three central demons, highlights their family resemblances and differences, and attempts to show that a certain kind of internalist view of justification provides the resources to handle these demons well.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
    Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    Übergeordneter Titel: Enthalten in: International journal for the study of skepticism; Leiden : Brill, 2011; 11(2021), 4, Seite 312-354; Online-Ressource

    Schlagworte: new evil demon; debasing demon; evil demon; skepticism; justification; knowledge
  2. Justifications of repression in autocracies
    an empirical analysis of the Maghreb, 2000-2010
    Autor*in: Josua, Maria
    Erschienen: August 2022
    Verlag:  German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA), Hamburg, Germany

    Previous studies on the justification of repression have analysed large-scale protests, about which autocratic officials communicate to avoid backlash effects. However, we know much less about how everyday repression against dissidents and ordinary... mehr

    Zugang:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)

    Standort:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Signatur:
    DS 127
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    Previous studies on the justification of repression have analysed large-scale protests, about which autocratic officials communicate to avoid backlash effects. However, we know much less about how everyday repression against dissidents and ordinary citizens is communicated and justified under authoritarianism. This paper is the first to systematically investigate how officials in autocracies justify, conceal, or deny different forms of repression employed by different state institutions. It studies the communication of repression in two North African autocracies, drawing on the novel Justifications of Repressive Incidents in Morocco and Tunisia Dataset. The dataset contains 439 events between 2000-2010 and disaggregates the various dimensions of repression and its communication. The empirical analysis shows that the chosen forms of repression influence patterns of communication and justification. Studying the communication of repression helps us better understand the nexus of authoritarian legitimation and political violence in the Middle East and North Africa region and beyond.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    hdl: 10419/263219
    Schriftenreihe: GIGA working papers ; no 331
    GIGA research unit: GIGA Institute for Middle East Studies
    Schlagworte: North Africa; Maghreb; repression; legitimation; communication; justification; dataset
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 38 Seiten), Illustrationen
  3. An Unresolved Dilemma in English Bible Translation
    How to English Paul’s Use of the Dikai- Family
    Autor*in: Moore, Richard K.
    Erschienen: 2020

    From the Lollard versions of the fourteenth century, the six words of the word family at the heart of Paul’s doctrine of justification have most often been represented by two English word families. Tyndale also used them for his 1526 New Testament,... mehr

     

    From the Lollard versions of the fourteenth century, the six words of the word family at the heart of Paul’s doctrine of justification have most often been represented by two English word families. Tyndale also used them for his 1526 New Testament, providing the model for KJV (1611), dominant for over 350 years. With the Reformation, this two-word-family approach became linked with the Protestants’ forensic model of justification. In the nineteenth century an alternative view was developed: the relational model. Characterized by a single English word family, it became quite influential in the last third of the twentieth century, being the preferred model of the mainstream Bible Societies in the USA and Britain. However, by the twenty-first century it had disappeared from commonly used English versions. Reasons given here show that reinstatement of the relational model is essential if Paul’s message of justification is to become intelligible to an English reader.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    Übergeordneter Titel: Enthalten in: The Bible translator; London : Sage, 1950; 71(2020), 1, Seite 120-136

    Schlagworte: English Bible translations; Galatians; Paul; Romans; justification
  4. The proper basicality of belief in God and the evil-god challenge
    Autor*in: Hendricks, Perry
    Erschienen: 2023

    The evil-god challenge is a challenge for theists to show that belief in God is more reasonable than belief in evil-god. In this article, I show that whether or not evil-god exists, belief in evil-god is unjustified. But this isn't the case for... mehr

    Standort:
    Index theologicus der Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    The evil-god challenge is a challenge for theists to show that belief in God is more reasonable than belief in evil-god. In this article, I show that whether or not evil-god exists, belief in evil-god is unjustified. But this isn't the case for belief in God: belief in God is probably justified if theism is true. And hence belief in God is (significantly) more reasonable than belief in evil-god, and the evil-god challenge has been answered.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
    Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    Übergeordneter Titel: Enthalten in: Religious studies; Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965; 59(2023), 1, Seite 55-62; Online-Ressource

    Schlagworte: Alvin Plantinga; divine hiddenness; evil-god challenge; justification; religious epistemology
  5. ‘The Speech of the Dead'
    Identifying the No Longer and Now Living ‘I' of Galatians 2.20
    Autor*in: Linebaugh, Jonathan A.
    Erschienen: [2020]

    Paul's strange confession in Gal 2.19-20 poses a question: is the ‘I' who was crucified with Christ and no longer lives the same self as the ‘I' who now lives and in whom Christ lives? To ask this question is to be drawn into conversation with the... mehr

    Standort:
    Index theologicus der Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    Paul's strange confession in Gal 2.19-20 poses a question: is the ‘I' who was crucified with Christ and no longer lives the same self as the ‘I' who now lives and in whom Christ lives? To ask this question is to be drawn into conversation with the reception history of Galatians and also to be invited to locate the Pauline ‘I' in and across the movements from death to life. This article suggests, in dialogue especially with Martin Luther, that for Paul the movement from the state of creation to the state of sin is a movement from life to death; the movement from sin to salvation, conversely, is a movement from death to life. Within or across these ruptures, salvation is as radical as death and resurrection. In this sense, the no longer and now living selves are not identical: the ‘I' is in another as a gift. And yet, the ‘I' who lives by grace is also the ‘I' who was, is and will be loved by the ‘Son of God who loved me and gave himself for me.'

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
    Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    Übergeordneter Titel: Enthalten in: New Testament studies; Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954; 66(2020), 1, Seite 87-105; Online-Ressource

    Schlagworte: Galatians; I; Luther; Paul; death; justification; life; union with Christ