Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 5 von 5.

  1. The markets in crypto-assets regulation (MICA) and the EU digital finance strategy
    Erschienen: 06/11/2020
    Verlag:  European Banking Institute e.V., Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    The European Commission published its new Digital Finance Strategy on 24 September 2020. One of the centrepieces of the Strategy is the draft Regulation on Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA), designed to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for... mehr

    Zugang:
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    keine Fernleihe
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    VS 636
    keine Fernleihe

     

    The European Commission published its new Digital Finance Strategy on 24 September 2020. One of the centrepieces of the Strategy is the draft Regulation on Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA), designed to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets in the EU.With MiCA the EU Commission has proposed bespoke regulation for utility tokens and stablecoins including payments tokens, asset-backed tokens and “significant” stablecoins (including “global stablecoins”). As to investment and securities tokens, the EU Digital Finance Strategy relies on the existing body of EU financial and securities law, with the Prospectus Regulation, the MiFID framework as well as the UCITSD and AIFMD at its core, with the intention to incorporate necessary changes as part of the existing ongoing amendment and review processes. MiCA provides for a bespoke prospectus regime for crypto-assets, with the issuing of e-money tokens (i.e. payment tokens), asset-referenced tokens (also known as stablecoins) and crypto-asset services being regulated activities subject to licensing. While supervision of crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) will rest with national authorities, supervision of significant asset-referenced and e-money tokens will rest mainly with the European Banking Authority.The EU Digital Finance Strategy marks a very important step for the EU in developing both innovation and the Single Market. At the same time, while MiCA is an ambitious legislative project, there is room for improvement. First, the scope of MiCA remains uncertain as the draft MiCA does not clearly delineate between utility tokens subject to MiCA and investment tokens subject to EU securities law. Second, a systematic approach to EU law is absent. Thresholds and concepts known from other EU laws should be firmly embedded in MiCA. Third, a framework for supervisory cooperation with regard to truly global stablecoins is missing

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    Schriftenreihe: EBI working paper series ; no. 77 (2020)
    Schlagworte: Digital Finance; Eu Digital Finance Action Plan; MiCA; Cryptoassets; Stablecoins; Payment Tokens; Currency Tokens; Utility Tokens; Securities Token; Investment Tokens; MiFID; prospectus regulation; Initial Coin Offerings; FinTech; financial law; securities law
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 33 Seiten)
  2. Information investment regulation and portfolio delegation
    Erschienen: May 2020
    Verlag:  Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

    Zugang:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    VS 766
    keine Fernleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Schriftenreihe: KIER discussion paper series ; no. 1032
    Schlagworte: adverse selection; delegated portfolio management; FinTech; information investment; market freeze
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 70 Seiten), Illustrationen
  3. Human vs. machine
    underwriting decisions in finance
    Erschienen: [2020]
    Verlag:  The Ohio State University, Fisher College of Business, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics, [Columbus, Ohio]

    Using a randomized experiment in the auto lending industry, we provide causal evidence of higher loan profitability and lower default rates with algorithmic machine underwriting, relative to human underwriting. We find that machine-underwritten loans... mehr

    Zugang:
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    keine Fernleihe
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Keine Rechte
    keine Fernleihe

     

    Using a randomized experiment in the auto lending industry, we provide causal evidence of higher loan profitability and lower default rates with algorithmic machine underwriting, relative to human underwriting. We find that machine-underwritten loans generate 10.2% higher profit than human-underwritten loans in a sample of 140,000 randomly assigned loans. When loans to otherwise identical borrowers are compared, the loans underwritten by machines not only have higher APRs but also sustain a 6.8% lower incidence of default, relative to loans underwritten by humans. The performance gap is more pronounced with more complex loans and at discrete cutoffs. The use of a discontinuous variable space to categorize consumer credit profiles by human underwriters is associated with a 40.2% increase in default rates and 24.7% less profit. These results are consistent with findings on the human mind's limited capacity for analyzing complex problems and with agency conflicts in the underwriting process

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    Schriftenreihe: Working papers series / Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics ; WP 2020, 019
    Charles A. Dice Center Working Paper ; No. 2020-19
    Fisher College of Business working paper series ; WP 2020-03, 019
    Weitere Schlagworte: Array
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 52 Seiten), Illustrationen
  4. Digital finance platforms
    toward a new regulatory paradigm
    Erschienen: Novermber 2020
    Verlag:  European Banking Institute e.V., Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    One of the most consequential yet unexamined developments in finance is the recent evolution of large financial technology platforms. In the first analysis of its kind, we scrutinize the world's $50 trillion investment and asset management industry... mehr

    Zugang:
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    keine Fernleihe
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    VS 636
    keine Fernleihe

     

    One of the most consequential yet unexamined developments in finance is the recent evolution of large financial technology platforms. In the first analysis of its kind, we scrutinize the world's $50 trillion investment and asset management industry to explore the function of these systems, to consider their possible risks, and to develop a taxonomy for their regulation. This analysis is essential because these systems now play a critical role in asset management, rendering nugatory several layers of existing regulation. While the Covid-19 pandemic has caused havoc with economic activity, it has accelerated this process of digitization and concentration of financial control. The leading example of such a platform is BlackRock's Aladdin, a system used to manage the risks relating to ten percent of the world's investment assets and which institutional investors – as well as the U.S. government – admit they cannot operate without. Even greater concentrations of financial power are possible when Big Technology firms and finance unite. Ant Group, a spinoff of Alibaba, controls a financial ecosystem for over 1.2 billion clients – twenty-one percent of the world's adults – covering all financial services, including payments, insurance, asset management, and deposits. The market value of this single firm is almost three times that of Goldman Sachs. Large U.S. financial and tech firms, including Facebook, Apple, and Google, are working hard to emulate Ant's scale and scope, driving concentration into a small number of dominant digital finance platforms. Although Financial Technology is typically associated with small innovative firms, we argue that these giant digital finance platforms are already having a far greater impact on society. We identify the economic reasons for the dramatic ascendancy of these financial leviathans and propose a legal framework for mitigating their threats to national security, financial stability, consumer protection, antitrust and cybersecurity

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    Schriftenreihe: EBI working paper series ; no. 58/2020
    European Banking Institute (EBI) Working Paper Series ; No. 58/2020
    Schlagworte: FinTech; RegTech; Operating Systems; Financial Regulation; Big Data; BigTech; TechFin; Enforcement; Asset Management; Robo-Advice; Collective Investment Schemes; Mutual Funds
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 68 Seiten)
  5. Decentralized finance
    Erschienen: March 2020
    Verlag:  European Banking Institute e.V., Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    DeFi – ‘Decentralized Finance' – has joined FinTech, RegTech, cryptocurrencies and digital assets as one of the most discussed emerging technological evolutions in global finance. Yet little is really understood about its meaning, legal implications... mehr

    Zugang:
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    keine Fernleihe
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    VS 636
    keine Fernleihe

     

    DeFi – ‘Decentralized Finance' – has joined FinTech, RegTech, cryptocurrencies and digital assets as one of the most discussed emerging technological evolutions in global finance. Yet little is really understood about its meaning, legal implications and policy consequences. This article introduces DeFi, puts DeFi in the context of the traditional financial economy, connects DeFi to Open Banking and ends with some policy considerations. We suggest that decentralization has the potential to undermine traditional forms of accountability and erode the effectiveness of traditional financial regulation and enforcement. At the same time, we find that where parts of the financial services value chain are decentralized, there will be a reconcentration in a different (but possibly less regulated, less visible and less transparent) part of the value chain. DeFi regulation could and should focus on this reconcentrated portion of the value chain to ensure effective oversight and risk control. Rather than eliminating the need for regulation, in fact DeFi requires regulation in order to achieve its core objective of decentralization: decentralization arguably requires centralization of some form in order to be successful in most cases. Furthermore, DeFi potentially offers an opportunity for the development of an entirely new way to design regulation – the ideas of 'embedded supervision' and ‘embedded regulation' – building regulatory approaches into the design of DeFi, potentially decentralizing both finance and its regulation in the ultimate expression of RegTech

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    Schriftenreihe: EBI working paper series ; no. 59/2020
    Schlagworte: DeFi; Decentralized Finance; FinTech; Blockchain; Distributed Ledger; Financial Regulation; Supervision; RegTech
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 56 Seiten)