Direkt zur Hauptnavigation springen Direkt zum Inhalt springen
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 3 von 3.

  1. The discursive performance of EU digital sovereignty
    three co-performances
    Autor*in: Cong, Wanshu
    Erschienen: 2021
    Verlag:  European University Institute, Badia Fiesolana, Italy

    Zugang:

    Standort:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Signatur:
    VS 47
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe
    Standort:
    Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung, Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    WP/Online
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    hdl: 1814/73307
    Schriftenreihe: EUI working papers ; MWP 2021/07
    Schlagworte: Digital sovereignty; the European Union; discourse analysis; co-performance
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (25 Seiten)
  2. Comparison between China, the EU and the US's climate and energy governance
    how policies are made and implemented at different levels
    Autor*in: Lu, Xinqing; Zhu, Erpu; Campbell, Loyle; Hafner, Manfred; Noussan, Michel; Raimondi, Pier Paolo
    Erschienen: December 2021
    Verlag:  Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milano, Italia

    This paper compares the different multi-level climate and energy governance in China, the European Union and the United States. While many comparisons across these three economies exist, they concentrate on comparing the climate and energy "policy... mehr

    Zugang:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)

    Standort:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Signatur:
    DS 125
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    This paper compares the different multi-level climate and energy governance in China, the European Union and the United States. While many comparisons across these three economies exist, they concentrate on comparing the climate and energy "policy instruments" and their results. This paper puts a focus on the importance of institutionalized multi-level governance processes, i.e., the "politics" - the actors and interaction processes inherent in a mode of governance, and the "polities" - the institutional setting. How are priorities and targets decided from both bottom-up and top-down processes? How do the central governments exert control over local authorities and ensure the implementation of their policies? How do the central governments enforce and evaluate the results of the policies? And finally, how do citizens play a role in the multi-level governance in these three blocs? Analysis of multilevel governance highlights the importance of target setting and cadre evaluation in China whereas legislation is the dominant process in the EU and the US.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    hdl: 10419/249969
    Schriftenreihe: Working paper / Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei ; 2021, 034
    Schlagworte: Multi-level Governance; Climate Policy; Energy Policy; Energy Transition; China; the European Union; the United States
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 33 Seiten), Illustrationen
  3. Towards an inclusive energy transition beyond coal
    a comparison of just transition policies away from coal between China, the EU and the US
    Autor*in: Zhu, Erpu; Campbell, Loyle; Hafner, Manfred; Lu, Xinqing; Noussan, Michel; Raimondi, Pier Paolo
    Erschienen: December 2021
    Verlag:  Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milano, Italia

    This paper compares different just transition pathways in China, the European Union and the United States of America by comparing the current state of the coal sector and just transition policies away from coal. How can social justice in the energy... mehr

    Zugang:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)

    Standort:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Signatur:
    DS 125
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    This paper compares different just transition pathways in China, the European Union and the United States of America by comparing the current state of the coal sector and just transition policies away from coal. How can social justice in the energy transition be achieved under different models of energy governance? Since these three blocs have only made some progress on just transition policies and legislations for workers and communities impacted by the coal phase down or phase out in recent years, there have not been many studies comparing them to each other. The analysis in this paper shows that while all three blocs work towards ensuring the integration of coal workers and coal communities into the clean economy in the process of coal reduction, their approaches to achieving a just transition differ in terms of policy frameworks, financing resources, specific measures and public participation. This paper is part of a series of FEEM working papers of comparison studies of China, the EU and the US in the field of climate and energy.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    hdl: 10419/249971
    Schriftenreihe: Working paper / Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei ; 2021, 036
    Schlagworte: Energy Transition; Just Transition; Coal Phase Out; Inclusiveness; China; the European Union; the United States
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 32 Seiten), Illustrationen