Filtern nach
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 1 von 1.

  1. Commitment requests do not affect truth-telling in laboratory and online experiments
    Erschienen: [2023]
    Verlag:  Collaborative Research Center Transregio 190, [München]

    Using a standard cheating game, we investigate whether the request to sign a no-cheating declaration affects truth-telling. Our design varies the content of a no-cheating declaration (reference to ethical behavior vs. reference to possible sanctions)... mehr

    Zugang:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DS 553
    keine Fernleihe

     

    Using a standard cheating game, we investigate whether the request to sign a no-cheating declaration affects truth-telling. Our design varies the content of a no-cheating declaration (reference to ethical behavior vs. reference to possible sanctions) and the type of experiment (online vs. offline). Irrespective of the declaration's content, commitment requests do not affect truth-telling, neither in the laboratory nor online. The inefficacy of commitment requests appears robust across different samples and does not depend on psychological measures of reactance.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    hdl: 10419/282157
    Schriftenreihe: Discussion paper / Rationality & Competition, CRC TRR 190 ; no. 466 (November 27, 2023)
    Schlagworte: cheating; lying; truth-telling; compliance; commitment; no-cheating rule; no-cheating declaration; commitment request
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 30 Seiten)