Filtern nach
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 2 von 2.

  1. Digital finance platforms
    toward a new regulatory paradigm
    Erschienen: Novermber 2020
    Verlag:  European Banking Institute e.V., Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    One of the most consequential yet unexamined developments in finance is the recent evolution of large financial technology platforms. In the first analysis of its kind, we scrutinize the world's $50 trillion investment and asset management industry... mehr

    Zugang:
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    keine Fernleihe
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    VS 636
    keine Fernleihe

     

    One of the most consequential yet unexamined developments in finance is the recent evolution of large financial technology platforms. In the first analysis of its kind, we scrutinize the world's $50 trillion investment and asset management industry to explore the function of these systems, to consider their possible risks, and to develop a taxonomy for their regulation. This analysis is essential because these systems now play a critical role in asset management, rendering nugatory several layers of existing regulation. While the Covid-19 pandemic has caused havoc with economic activity, it has accelerated this process of digitization and concentration of financial control. The leading example of such a platform is BlackRock's Aladdin, a system used to manage the risks relating to ten percent of the world's investment assets and which institutional investors – as well as the U.S. government – admit they cannot operate without. Even greater concentrations of financial power are possible when Big Technology firms and finance unite. Ant Group, a spinoff of Alibaba, controls a financial ecosystem for over 1.2 billion clients – twenty-one percent of the world's adults – covering all financial services, including payments, insurance, asset management, and deposits. The market value of this single firm is almost three times that of Goldman Sachs. Large U.S. financial and tech firms, including Facebook, Apple, and Google, are working hard to emulate Ant's scale and scope, driving concentration into a small number of dominant digital finance platforms. Although Financial Technology is typically associated with small innovative firms, we argue that these giant digital finance platforms are already having a far greater impact on society. We identify the economic reasons for the dramatic ascendancy of these financial leviathans and propose a legal framework for mitigating their threats to national security, financial stability, consumer protection, antitrust and cybersecurity

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    Schriftenreihe: EBI working paper series ; no. 58/2020
    European Banking Institute (EBI) Working Paper Series ; No. 58/2020
    Schlagworte: FinTech; RegTech; Operating Systems; Financial Regulation; Big Data; BigTech; TechFin; Enforcement; Asset Management; Robo-Advice; Collective Investment Schemes; Mutual Funds
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 68 Seiten)
  2. Decentralized finance
    Erschienen: March 2020
    Verlag:  European Banking Institute e.V., Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    DeFi – ‘Decentralized Finance' – has joined FinTech, RegTech, cryptocurrencies and digital assets as one of the most discussed emerging technological evolutions in global finance. Yet little is really understood about its meaning, legal implications... mehr

    Zugang:
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    keine Fernleihe
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    VS 636
    keine Fernleihe

     

    DeFi – ‘Decentralized Finance' – has joined FinTech, RegTech, cryptocurrencies and digital assets as one of the most discussed emerging technological evolutions in global finance. Yet little is really understood about its meaning, legal implications and policy consequences. This article introduces DeFi, puts DeFi in the context of the traditional financial economy, connects DeFi to Open Banking and ends with some policy considerations. We suggest that decentralization has the potential to undermine traditional forms of accountability and erode the effectiveness of traditional financial regulation and enforcement. At the same time, we find that where parts of the financial services value chain are decentralized, there will be a reconcentration in a different (but possibly less regulated, less visible and less transparent) part of the value chain. DeFi regulation could and should focus on this reconcentrated portion of the value chain to ensure effective oversight and risk control. Rather than eliminating the need for regulation, in fact DeFi requires regulation in order to achieve its core objective of decentralization: decentralization arguably requires centralization of some form in order to be successful in most cases. Furthermore, DeFi potentially offers an opportunity for the development of an entirely new way to design regulation – the ideas of 'embedded supervision' and ‘embedded regulation' – building regulatory approaches into the design of DeFi, potentially decentralizing both finance and its regulation in the ultimate expression of RegTech

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    Schriftenreihe: EBI working paper series ; no. 59/2020
    Schlagworte: DeFi; Decentralized Finance; FinTech; Blockchain; Distributed Ledger; Financial Regulation; Supervision; RegTech
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 56 Seiten)