Direkt zur Hauptnavigation springen Direkt zum Inhalt springen
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 3 von 3.

  1. Motivated reasoning, information avoidance, and default bias
    Autor*in: Momsen, Katharina; Schneider, Sebastian O.
    Erschienen: April 2022
    Verlag:  Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn

    We investigate whether the presence of a default interacts with the willingness of decision-makers to gather, process and consider information. In an online experiment, where about 2,300 participants choose between two compiled charity donation... mehr

    Zugang:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)

    Standort:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Signatur:
    DS 62
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    We investigate whether the presence of a default interacts with the willingness of decision-makers to gather, process and consider information. In an online experiment, where about 2,300 participants choose between two compiled charity donation options worth $ 100, we vary the availability of information and the presence of a default. Information avoidance, when possible, increases default effects considerably, manifesting a hitherto undocumented channel of the default bias. Moreover, we show that defaults trigger motivated reasoning: In the presence of a default - even if self-selected-, participants consider new information to a lower degree than without a preselected option.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    hdl: 21.11116/0000-000A-3221-8
    hdl: 10419/262308
    Schriftenreihe: Discussion papers of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods ; 2022, 3
    Schlagworte: Motivated reasoning; information avoidance; defaults; statusquo; charitable giving; experiment
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 39 Seiten), Illustrationen
  2. Motivated reasoning, information avoidance, and default bias
    Autor*in: Momsen, Katharina; Schneider, Sebastian O.
    Erschienen: [2022]
    Verlag:  Research platform Empirical and Experimental Economics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    We investigate whether the presence of a default interacts with the willingness of decision-makers to gather, process and consider information. In an online experiment, where about 2,300 participants choose between two compiled charity donation... mehr

    Zugang:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)

    Standort:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Signatur:
    DS 395
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    We investigate whether the presence of a default interacts with the willingness of decision-makers to gather, process and consider information. In an online experiment, where about 2,300 participants choose between two compiled charity donation options worth $100, we vary the availability of information and the presence of a default. Information avoidance, when possible, increases default effects considerably, manifesting a hitherto undocumented channel of the default bias. Moreover, we show that defaults trigger motivated reasoning: In the presence of a default - even if self-selected-, participants consider new information to a lower degree than without a preselected option.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    hdl: 10419/273678
    Schriftenreihe: Working papers in economics and statistics ; 2022, 5
    Schlagworte: Motivated reasoning; information avoidance; defaults; status quo; charitable giving; experiment
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 43 Seiten), Illustrationen
  3. Moral motive selection in the lying dictator game
    Autor*in: Barron, Kai; Stüber, Robert; Veldhuizen, Roel van
    Erschienen: September 2022
    Verlag:  Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Lund

    An extensive literature documents that people are willing to sacrifice personal material gain to adhere to a moral motive. Yet, less is known about what happens when moral motives are in conflict. We hypothesize that individuals engage in what we... mehr

    Zugang:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)

    Standort:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Signatur:
    DS 815
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    An extensive literature documents that people are willing to sacrifice personal material gain to adhere to a moral motive. Yet, less is known about what happens when moral motives are in conflict. We hypothesize that individuals engage in what we term "motive selection," namely adhering to the moral motive that aligns with their self-interest. We test this hypothesis using a laboratory experiment that induces a conflict between two of the most-studied moral motives: fairness and truth-telling. In line with our hypothesis, our results show that individuals prefer to adhere to the moral motive that is more aligned with their self-interest.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    hdl: 10419/273646
    Schriftenreihe: Working paper / Department of Economics, Lund University ; 2022, 16
    Schlagworte: Motivated reasoning; dictator game; lying game; motives; moral dilemmas
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 63 Seiten), Illustrationen