Filtern nach
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 1 von 1.

  1. Assessing the use of back translation: the shortcomings of back translation as a quality testing method
    Autor*in: Behr, Dorothée
    Erschienen: 2017
    Verlag:  SSOAR, GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften e.V., Mannheim

    Abstract: Back translation - the 're-translation' of a translated questionnaire back into the original language and the subsequent comparison of the original version and the back translation - is a controversial assessment method for questionnaire... mehr

     

    Abstract: Back translation - the 're-translation' of a translated questionnaire back into the original language and the subsequent comparison of the original version and the back translation - is a controversial assessment method for questionnaire translations. Recently, cross-cultural survey methodologists have followed the call for more empirical research on this method. This article adds to the small body of research by drawing on the back translation documentation from the 2012 European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS). First, results from the official EQLS back translation step are contrasted with results when additional persons perform the same comparison step between back translation and original. We note inconsistency in the detection of presumed flaws. Second, the back translation outcome is contrasted with additional native speaker checks of the actual translation. While back translation can uncover problems, it causes quite a number of false alarms, and even more importantly, many pr

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    DDC Klassifikation: Sozialwissenschaften (300)
    Weitere Schlagworte: (thesoz)Qualitätssicherung; (thesoz)Übersetzung; (thesoz)Umfrageforschung; (thesoz)Fragebogen; survey translation; back translation; assessment method; translation quality
    Umfang: Online-Ressource
    Bemerkung(en):

    Postprint

    begutachtet (peer reviewed)

    In: International Journal of Social Research Methodology ; 20 (2017) 6 ; 573-584