Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 5 von 5.

  1. What is the benefit from publishing a working paper in a journal in terms of citations?
    evidence from economics
    Erschienen: March 2021
    Verlag:  CESifo, Center for Economic Studies & Ifo Institute, Munich, Germany

    Many papers in economics that are published in peer reviewed journals are initially released in widely circulated working paper series. This raises the question about the benefit of publishing in a peer-reviewed journal in terms of citations.... mehr

    Zugang:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DS 63
    keine Fernleihe

     

    Many papers in economics that are published in peer reviewed journals are initially released in widely circulated working paper series. This raises the question about the benefit of publishing in a peer-reviewed journal in terms of citations. Specifically, we address the question: To what extent does the stamp of approval obtained by publishing in a peer-reviewed journal lead to more subsequent citations for papers that are already available in working paper series? Our data set comprises about 28.000 working papers from four major working paper series in economics. Using panel data methods, we show that the publication in a peer reviewed journal results in around twice the number of yearly citations relative to working papers that never get published in a journal. Our results hold in several robustness checks.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    hdl: 10419/235295
    Schriftenreihe: CESifo working paper ; no. 8925 (2021)
    Schlagworte: peer review; citations; RePEc; working paper; preprint
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 22 Seiten), Illustrationen
  2. Nobel and novice: author prominence affects peer review
    Erschienen: 2022
    Verlag:  University of Graz, School of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, [Graz]

    Zugang:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    VS 553
    keine Fernleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Schriftenreihe: Working paper / School of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Graz ; 2022, 01 (August 16, 2022)
    Schlagworte: peer review; scientific method; double-anonymized; status bias
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 119 Seiten), Illustrationen
  3. Tactical refereeing and signaling by publishing
    Erschienen: July 2022
    Verlag:  Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom

    A peer review is used ubiquitously in hiring, promotional, and evaluation decisions, within academia and beyond. It is usually conducted to allocate limited resources, such as the budget of a funder or the pages of a journal. With limited capacity, a... mehr

    Zugang:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DS 159
    keine Fernleihe

     

    A peer review is used ubiquitously in hiring, promotional, and evaluation decisions, within academia and beyond. It is usually conducted to allocate limited resources, such as the budget of a funder or the pages of a journal. With limited capacity, a peer review may lead to negatively biased evaluations precisely because approving a peer's worthy project lowers the chance that a referee's own project will be approved. I show that limited capacity is inconsistent with a hypothesis that the decision-maker's policy is to stimulate efforts, and I discuss possible decision-maker motivations that could lead to a limited capacity policy.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    hdl: 10419/284157
    Schriftenreihe: Cardiff economics working papers ; no. E2022, 14
    Schlagworte: refereeing; peer review
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 20 Seiten), Illustrationen
  4. Gaming the Metrics
    Misconduct and Manipulation in Academic Research
    Beteiligt: Biagioli, Mario (Herausgeber); Lippman, Alexandra (Herausgeber)
    Erschienen: 2020
    Verlag:  The MIT Press, Cambridge ; OAPEN FOUNDATION, The Hague

    How the increasing reliance on metrics to evaluate scholarly publications has produced new forms of academic fraud and misconduct. The traditional academic imperative to “publish or perish” is increasingly coupled with the newer necessity of “impact... mehr

    Zugang:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Bibliothek der Hochschule Darmstadt, Zentralbibliothek
    keine Fernleihe
    TU Darmstadt, Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek - Stadtmitte
    keine Fernleihe
    Bibliothek der Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences
    keine Fernleihe
    Universitätsbibliothek J. C. Senckenberg, Zentralbibliothek (ZB)
    keine Fernleihe
    Hochschul- und Landesbibliothek Fulda, Standort Heinrich-von-Bibra-Platz
    keine Fernleihe
    Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen, Hochschulbibliothek Gießen
    keine Fernleihe
    Universitätsbibliothek Gießen
    keine Fernleihe
    Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Landesbibliothek und Murhardsche Bibliothek der Stadt Kassel
    keine Fernleihe
    Universität Mainz, Zentralbibliothek
    keine Fernleihe
    Universität Marburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    keine Fernleihe

     

    How the increasing reliance on metrics to evaluate scholarly publications has produced new forms of academic fraud and misconduct. The traditional academic imperative to “publish or perish” is increasingly coupled with the newer necessity of “impact or perish”—the requirement that a publication have “impact,” as measured by a variety of metrics, including citations, views, and downloads. Gaming the Metrics examines how the increasing reliance on metrics to evaluate scholarly publications has produced radically new forms of academic fraud and misconduct. The contributors show that the metrics-based “audit culture” has changed the ecology of research, fostering the gaming and manipulation of quantitative indicators, which lead to the invention of such novel forms of misconduct as citation rings and variously rigged peer reviews. The chapters, written by both scholars and those in the trenches of academic publication, provide a map of academic fraud and misconduct today. They consider such topics as the shortcomings of metrics, the gaming of impact factors, the emergence of so-called predatory journals, the “salami slicing” of scientific findings, the rigging of global university rankings, and the creation of new watchdogs and forensic practices.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
  5. Collaborative scholarly communities and access in the study of material and visual cultures of religion
    Erschienen: [2018]

    The Center for the Study of Material and Visual Cultures of Religion at Yale University (MAVCOR) does not simply, or even most fundamentally, shape a physical center at Yale University. Although MAVCOR organizes events at Yale and coordinates project... mehr

    Index theologicus der Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
    keine Fernleihe

     

    The Center for the Study of Material and Visual Cultures of Religion at Yale University (MAVCOR) does not simply, or even most fundamentally, shape a physical center at Yale University. Although MAVCOR organizes events at Yale and coordinates project cycles involving Yale affiliates as well as scholars from other universities in the United States and around the world, much of MAVCOR's activity is conducted online. MAVCOR publishes a born-digital, open-access double-blind peer-reviewed journal, MAVCOR Journal. It also features a born-digital exhibition space, the Material Objects Archive. In at least two ways, MAVCOR is deliberately interstitial, invested in the connective spaces between both disciplines and technologies. First, the Center emerged from a desire to promote interdisciplinary conversation among scholars of religion, art history, anthropology, and others engaged with our subjects of inquiry. We have aimed to accomplish this goal by shaping a forum for conversation and an archive for mutual use. Second, MAVCOR engages the need to form a space for peer-reviewed content online in a manner that emphasizes the mutually beneficial relationship of print and digital modes of inquiry. In this work, MAVCOR's overarching commitment is to promote innovative, substantively researched, thoughtfully constructed scholarship, with robust interdisciplinarity as a fundamental element of form and content.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    Übergeordneter Titel: Enthalten in: Religion; London [u.a.] : Routledge, 1971; 48(2018), 2, Seite 262-275; Online-Ressource

    Schlagworte: born digital; Collaborative; digital humanities; material religion