Filtern nach
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 3 von 3.

  1. Counterfeiting Shakespeare
    evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye
    Autor*in: Vickers, Brian
    Erschienen: 2002
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These... mehr

    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Unter den Linden
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These attributions have been accepted into certain major editions of Shakespeare's works but Brian Vickers argues that both attributions rest on superficial verbal parallels; both use too small a sample, ignore negative evidence, and violate basic principles in authorship studies. Through a fresh examination of the evidence, Professor Vickers shows that neither poem has the stylistic and imaginative qualities we associate with Shakespeare. In other words, they are 'counterfeits', in the sense of anonymously authored works wrongly presented as Shakespeare's. He argues that the poet and dramatist John Ford wrote the Elegye: its poetical language (vocabulary, syntax, prosody) is indistinguishable from Ford's, and it contains several hundred close parallels with his work. By combining linguistic and statistical analysis this book makes an important contribution to authorship studies

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
    Quelle: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9780511484049
    Weitere Identifier:
    Schlagworte: Poetry; W. S ; Funerall elegye in memory of the late virtuous master William Peeter of Whipton neere Exetour; Shakespeare, William ; 1564-1616 ; Authorship; Ford, John ; 1586-approximately 1640 ; Authorship; Poetry ; Authorship
    Weitere Schlagworte: Ford, John (1586-approximately 1640); Shakespeare, William (1564-1616); W. S: Funerall elegye in memory of the late virtuous master William Peeter of Whipton neere Exetour
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (xxvii, 568 pages), digital, PDF file(s)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)

    Prologue: Gary Taylor finds a poem -- pt. I. Donald Foster's 'Shakespearean' Construct. 1. 'W. S.' and the Elegye for William Peter. 2. Parallels? Plagiarisms? 3. Vocabulary and diction. 4. Grammar: 'the Shakespearean "who"'. 5. Prosody, punctuation, pause patterns. 6. Rhetoric: 'the Shakespearean "hendiadys"'. 7. Statistics and inference. 8. A poem 'indistinguishable from Shakespeare'? -- pt. II. John Ford's 'Funerall Elegye'. 9. Ford's writing career: poet, moralist, playwright. 10. Ford and the Elegye's 'Shakespearean diction'. 11. The Funerall Elegye in its Fordian context. Epilogue: The politics of attribution -- App. I. The text of A Funerall Elegye -- App. II. Verbal parallels between A Funerall Elegye and Ford's poems.

  2. Counterfeiting Shakespeare
    evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye
    Autor*in: Vickers, Brian
    Erschienen: 2002
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Brian Vickers examines the issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. Shakespeare's authorship has been claimed for two poems, 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. Vickers shows that neither has the requisite stylistic and... mehr

    Hochschulbibliothek Friedensau
    Online-Ressource
    keine Fernleihe

     

    Brian Vickers examines the issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. Shakespeare's authorship has been claimed for two poems, 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. Vickers shows that neither has the requisite stylistic and imaginative qualities. In other words, they are 'counterfeits', in the sense of anonymously authored works wrongly presented as Shakespeare's. He identifies John Ford as author of the Elegye

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 0521772435
    Schlagworte: Poetry
    Weitere Schlagworte: Ford, John (1586-ca. 1640); Shakespeare, William (1564-1616); W. S: Funerall elegye in memory of the late virtuous master William Peeter of Whipton neere Exetour
    Umfang: Online-Ressource (xxvii, 568 p), 24 cm
    Bemerkung(en):

    Includes bibliographical references (p. 554-562) and index

    Electronic reproduction; Available via World Wide Web

    Cover; Half-title; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; Preface; Tables; Abbreviations and note on references; 1. JOURNALS AND BOOKS; 2. WORKS BY WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE; 3. WORKS BY JOHN FORD; PROLOGUE Gary Taylor finds a poem; READING THE POEM; VERBAL PARALLELS; LITERARY HISTORY; SHAKESPEARE'S WORDS: SHAKESPEARE'S MEANINGS?; ATTRIBUTING AND EMENDING; RESPONDING TO CRITICISM; Shall I sue, and not rue my proceeding?; PART I Donald Foster's 'Shakespearean' construct; CHAPTER 1 'W. S.' and 'Elegye' for William Peter; CHAPTER 2 Parallels? Plagiarisms?; CHAPTER 3 Vocabulary and diction

    CHAPTER 4 Grammar: 'the Shakespearean "who" 'CHAPTER 5 Prosody, punctuation, pause patterns; CHAPTER 6 Rhetoric: 'the Shakespearean "hendiadys" '; CHAPTER 7 Statistics and inference; CHAPTER 8 A poem 'indistinguishable from Shakespeare'?; GENRE AND ARGUMENT; DICTION; SYNTAX; PART II John Ford's 'Funerall Elegye'; CHAPTER 9 Ford's writing career: poet, moralist, playwright; CHAPTER 10 Ford and the 'Elegye' 's 'Shakespearean diction'; LATINISMS AND WORD-FORMATION; VERBAL PREFERENCES; SYNTAX; PROSODY; RHETORIC; CHAPTER 11 The 'Funerall Elegye' in its Fordian context

    EPILOGUE The Politics of AttributionUSING THE MEDIA; DEALING WITH CRITICS; AUTHORSHIP STUDIES AND A 'CONTRITE FALLIBILISM'; Appendices; APPENDIX I The text of 'A Funerall Elegye'; A FUNERALL ELEGYE; APPENDIX II Verbal parallels between 'A Funerall Elegye' and Ford's poems; VERSE LINES BEGINNING WITH A PRESENT PARTICIPLE; 'Fames Memoriall'; 'A Funerall Elegye'; 'Christes Bloodie Sweat'; 'Fames Memoriall'; 'Funerall Elegye'; 'Christes Bloodie Sweat'; 'Fames Memoriall'; 'Funerall Elegye'; 'Christes Bloodie Sweat'; 'Fames Memoriall'; 'Funerall Elegye'; 'Christes Bloodie Sweat'; 'Fames Memoriall'

    'Funerall Elegye''Christes Bloodie Sweat'; 'Funerall Elegye'; 'Christes Bloodie Sweat'; 'Funerall Elegye'; 'Christes Bloodie Sweat'; 'Fames Memoriall'; 'Funerall Elegye'; 'Christes Bloodie Sweat'; APPENDIX III Establishing Ford's canon; THE PLAYS IN QUESTION; ATTRIBUTION CRITERIA: VERBAL PARALLELS; VOCABULARY, LINGUISTIC PREFERENCES; Notes; PROLOGUE. GARY TAYLOR FINDS A POEM; 1 'W. S.' AND THE 'ELEGYE' FOR WILLIAM PETER; 2 PARALLELS? PLAGIARISM?; 3 VOCABULARY AND DICTION; 4 GRAMMAR: 'THE SHAKESPEAREAN ""WHO"" '; 5 PROSODY, PUNCTUATION, PAUSE-PATTERNS

    6 RHETORIC: 'THE SHAKESPEAREAN ""HENDIADYS"" ' 7 STATISTICS AND INFERENCE; 8 A POEM 'INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM SHAKESPEARE'?; 9 FORD'S WRITING CAREER: POET, MORALIST, PLAYWRIGHT; 10 FORD AND THE 'ELEGYE' 'S SHAKESPEAREAN DICTION'; 11 THE 'FUNERALL ELEGYE' IN ITS FORDIAN CONTEXT; EPILOGUE, THE POLITICS OF ATTRIBUTION; APPENDIX 111: ESTABLISHING FORD'S CANON; Bibliography; Index

  3. Counterfeiting Shakespeare
    evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye
    Autor*in: Vickers, Brian
    Erschienen: 2002
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These... mehr

    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    E-Book CUP HSFK
    keine Fernleihe
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Potsdamer Straße
    keine Fernleihe
    Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen
    keine Fernleihe
    Technische Universität Chemnitz, Universitätsbibliothek
    keine Fernleihe
    Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, Bibliothek
    E-Book CUP HSFK
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt / Zentrale
    keine Fernleihe
    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Bibliothek - Niedersächsische Landesbibliothek
    keine Fernleihe
    Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Medien- und Informationszentrum, Universitätsbibliothek
    keine Fernleihe
    Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Universitätsbibliothek
    eBook Cambridge
    keine Fernleihe
    Bibliotheks-und Informationssystem der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (BIS)
    keine Fernleihe
    Universitätsbibliothek Rostock
    keine Fernleihe
    Württembergische Landesbibliothek
    keine Fernleihe
    Universitätsbibliothek der Eberhard Karls Universität
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

     

    'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These attributions have been accepted into certain major editions of Shakespeare's works but Brian Vickers argues that both attributions rest on superficial verbal parallels; both use too small a sample, ignore negative evidence, and violate basic principles in authorship studies. Through a fresh examination of the evidence, Professor Vickers shows that neither poem has the stylistic and imaginative qualities we associate with Shakespeare. In other words, they are 'counterfeits', in the sense of anonymously authored works wrongly presented as Shakespeare's. He argues that the poet and dramatist John Ford wrote the Elegye: its poetical language (vocabulary, syntax, prosody) is indistinguishable from Ford's, and it contains several hundred close parallels with his work. By combining linguistic and statistical analysis this book makes an important contribution to authorship studies

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
    Quelle: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9780511484049
    Weitere Identifier:
    Schlagworte: Poetry; W. S ; Funerall elegye in memory of the late virtuous master William Peeter of Whipton neere Exetour; Shakespeare, William ; 1564-1616 ; Authorship; Ford, John ; 1586-approximately 1640 ; Authorship; Poetry ; Authorship
    Weitere Schlagworte: Ford, John (1586-approximately 1640); Shakespeare, William (1564-1616); W. S: Funerall elegye in memory of the late virtuous master William Peeter of Whipton neere Exetour
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (xxvii, 568 pages), digital, PDF file(s)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)

    Prologue: Gary Taylor finds a poem -- pt. I. Donald Foster's 'Shakespearean' Construct. 1. 'W. S.' and the Elegye for William Peter. 2. Parallels? Plagiarisms? 3. Vocabulary and diction. 4. Grammar: 'the Shakespearean "who"'. 5. Prosody, punctuation, pause patterns. 6. Rhetoric: 'the Shakespearean "hendiadys"'. 7. Statistics and inference. 8. A poem 'indistinguishable from Shakespeare'? -- pt. II. John Ford's 'Funerall Elegye'. 9. Ford's writing career: poet, moralist, playwright. 10. Ford and the Elegye's 'Shakespearean diction'. 11. The Funerall Elegye in its Fordian context. Epilogue: The politics of attribution -- App. I. The text of A Funerall Elegye -- App. II. Verbal parallels between A Funerall Elegye and Ford's poems.