Filtern nach
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 2 von 2.

  1. Iconoclasm in aesthetics
    Autor*in: Kelly, Michael
    Erschienen: 2003
    Verlag:  Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge [u.a.]

    "Contemporary theorizing about art is dominated by a clash between two approaches: philosophers have characteristically taken the view that art is a vehicle of some universal meaning or truth, while art historians, and others working in the... mehr

    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Universitätsbibliothek, Jacob-und-Wilhelm-Grimm-Zentrum
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Kunstbibliothek
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Unter den Linden
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Universität Potsdam, Universitätsbibliothek
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    "Contemporary theorizing about art is dominated by a clash between two approaches: philosophers have characteristically taken the view that art is a vehicle of some universal meaning or truth, while art historians, and others working in the humanities, emphasize the concrete nature and historical particularity of the work of art. If philosophers continue to pursue mainly the universality of art, they inadvertently end up exhibiting a disinterest in and distrust of art. Kelly calls such disinterest and distrust "iconoclasm," and in this book he discusses four philosophers - Heidegger, Adorno, Derrida, and Danto - who are ultimately iconoclasts despite their deep philosophical engagement with the arts. He concludes by suggesting ways in which iconoclasm in aesthetics can be avoided in the future."--Jacket.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
  2. Iconoclasm in aesthetics
    Autor*in: Kelly, Michael
    Erschienen: 2003
    Verlag:  Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge [u.a.]

    "Contemporary theorizing about art is dominated by a clash between two approaches: philosophers have characteristically taken the view that art is a vehicle of some universal meaning or truth, while art historians, and others working in the... mehr

    Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen-Nürnberg, Hauptbibliothek
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Kunsthistorisches Institut in Florenz, Max-Planck-Institut, Bibliothek
    Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Zentralinstitut für Kunstgeschichte, Bibliothek
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

     

    "Contemporary theorizing about art is dominated by a clash between two approaches: philosophers have characteristically taken the view that art is a vehicle of some universal meaning or truth, while art historians, and others working in the humanities, emphasize the concrete nature and historical particularity of the work of art. If philosophers continue to pursue mainly the universality of art, they inadvertently end up exhibiting a disinterest in and distrust of art. Kelly calls such disinterest and distrust "iconoclasm," and in this book he discusses four philosophers - Heidegger, Adorno, Derrida, and Danto - who are ultimately iconoclasts despite their deep philosophical engagement with the arts. He concludes by suggesting ways in which iconoclasm in aesthetics can be avoided in the future."--Jacket.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format