Filtern nach
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 1 von 1.

  1. Philosophie braucht Wissenschaftsgeschichte braucht Philosophiegeschichte

    Abstract: Philosophy needs History of Science needs History of Philosophy. The purpose of this essay is to identify why history of science and philosophy of science have lost their former alliance. Reasons include, among others, structural elements... mehr

     

    Abstract: Philosophy needs History of Science needs History of Philosophy. The purpose of this essay is to identify why history of science and philosophy of science have lost their former alliance. Reasons include, among others, structural elements in funding, e.g. a run‐down version of interdisciplinarity that encourages philosophy and history to work with the sciences rather than with each other. Moreover, the disciplinary assemblage in terms of cultural studies (German: Kulturwissenschaften) has eroded the continental concept of ‘Geisteswissenschaft’ to which history and philosophy traditionally belong. In consequence, both disciplines face a loss of knowledge in historical terminologies and related inquiries. Above all, these matter for shaping and understanding concepts and ideas; not last for the conceptualization of history and philosophy of science themselves.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    Übergeordneter Titel:
    Enthalten in: Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte; Berlin : Wiley-VCH, 1978-; 41, Heft 4 (2018), 379-382 (gesamt 4); Online-Ressource
    Weitere Schlagworte: Ian Hacking; Michael Hampe; Geisteswissenschaft; Interdisziplinarität; Theorie; Wissenschaftsphilosophie; Wissenschaftsgeschichte
    Umfang: Online-Ressource