Filtern nach
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 1 von 1.

  1. Kolonialita jako druhá tvář modernity: k současné latinskoamerické postkoloniální kritice modernity
    Erschienen: 2012

    Abstract: The paper focuses on the Latin American perspective on modernity, especially on the Peruvian sociologist Anibal Quijano's notion of coloniality. Coloniality is explained as a theoret- ical framework for critical reflection of modernity with... mehr

     

    Abstract: The paper focuses on the Latin American perspective on modernity, especially on the Peruvian sociologist Anibal Quijano's notion of coloniality. Coloniality is explained as a theoret- ical framework for critical reflection of modernity with an emphasis on the forms of knowledge (episteme) and on non-Western, more specifically Latin American historical experiences and perspectives. The aim is to introduce some Latin American efforts to critically understand coloniality as the other face of modernity and to develop a distinctive critique of capitalism, globalisation and Eurocentrism in their historical dynamics, In the first part, the paper briefly introduces Latin America as a geocultural place and a object of social research in a historical perspective. Special attention is paid to the question of racial classification and authenticity. In the second part, the paper focuses on the notion of coloniality as it was conceptualised by A. Quijano and by other Latin American authors. In t

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Tschechisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/41965
    DDC Klassifikation: Sozialwissenschaften (300)
    Weitere Schlagworte: (thesoz)Moderne; (thesoz)Entkolonialisierung; (thesoz)Postkolonialismus; (thesoz)Lateinamerika; (thesoz)Eurozentrismus; (thesoz)Ethnozentrismus; coloniality; Aníbal Quijano; postcolonial critique
    Umfang: Online-Ressource
    Bemerkung(en):

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    begutachtet (peer reviewed)

    In: Historická sociologie / Historical Sociology (2012) 1-2 ; 75-94