Direkt zur Hauptnavigation springen Direkt zum Inhalt springen
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 7 von 7.

  1. The Gulag in writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov
    memory, history, testimony
    Beteiligt: Heffermehl, Fabian (HerausgeberIn); Karlson, Irina (HerausgeberIn)
    Erschienen: [2021]
    Verlag:  Brill, Leiden$aBoston

    Part 1.Literary origins.Discontinuities in the evolution of Kolyma Stories and "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" /Michael A. Nicholson ;Poetry after the Gulag: do Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov have a lyric mindset? /Ulrich Schmid ;More than a cat... mehr

    Standort:
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Unter den Linden
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    Part 1.Literary origins.Discontinuities in the evolution of Kolyma Stories and "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" /Michael A. Nicholson ;Poetry after the Gulag: do Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov have a lyric mindset? /Ulrich Schmid ;More than a cat : reflections on Shalamov's and Solzhenitsyn's writings through the perspective of trauma studies /Andrea Gullotta --Part 2.Memory and body.Why did Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov not write the Gulag Archipelago together? /Luba Jurgenson ;Tactility and memory in Shalamov /Fabian Heffermehl ;"Grudge-holding body": body and memory in the works of Varlam Shalamov /Franziska Thun-Hohenstein ;Certain properties of rhyme: poetic language touching abomination /Irina Sandomirskaia --Part 3.History and narrative.Counterfactuals and history in The Gulag Archipelago /Irina Karlsohn ;"The Gulag's Archipelago" : rhetoric of history /Elena Mikhailik ;Telling the stories of others and writing the bodies of others: the representation of women in Shalamov's Kolyma Stories and Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago /Josefina Lundblad-Janjić ;The issue of "softening" and the problem of addressivity in Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov /Leona Toker. "Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov are two of the best-known Gulag writers. After a short period of personal acquaintance, their lives and views on literature took different paths. Solzhenitsyn did not see a literary program in Shalamov's works, which he describes as "a result of exhaustion after years of hardship and hard labour in the camp". By understanding the text as a "result", Solzhenitsyn critically touched on a concept of evidence, which Shalamov several times emphasized as important to his own works. According to Shalamov, instead of the text being a re-presentation, it should be an extract from or substitute for the real or the factual, by which his Gulag experience became present once again. Concepts such as "document", "thing" and "fact" became important for Shalamov's self-identification as a modernist. At the same time, Solzhenitsyn, viewing his own task as one of restoring historical experiences of the Russian people and trying "to explain the slow course of history and what sort of one it has been", assumed the dual role of writer and historian, which inevitably raises the question of what characterizes the borders between fact and fiction in his works. It also raises question about dichotomies of historical and fictional truth"--

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Beteiligt: Heffermehl, Fabian (HerausgeberIn); Karlson, Irina (HerausgeberIn)
    Sprache: Englisch; Russisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Druck
    ISBN: 9789004468450
    Schriftenreihe: Studies in Slavic literature and poetics ; volume 63
    Schlagworte: Russian prose literature; Penal colonies in literature; Memory in literature
    Weitere Schlagworte: Solzhenit︠s︡yn, Aleksandr Isaevich (1918-2008); Shalamov, Varlam
    Umfang: XI, 296 Seiten
    Bemerkung(en):

    Includes bibliographical references and index

    Text teilweise in kyrillischer Schrift

    The inspiration for this book came from the international conference "The Gulag in Writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov: Fact, Document, Fiction", Uppsala University, Sweden, April 20-21, 2017. (Acknowledgements)
  2. The Gulag in writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov
    memory, history, testimony
    Beteiligt: Heffermehl, Fabian (HerausgeberIn); Karlson, Irina (HerausgeberIn)
    Erschienen: [2021]
    Verlag:  Brill, Leiden

    Part 1.Literary origins.Discontinuities in the evolution of Kolyma Stories and "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" /Michael A. Nicholson ;Poetry after the Gulag: do Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov have a lyric mindset? /Ulrich Schmid ;More than a cat... mehr

    Standort:
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Potsdamer Straße
    Signatur:
    10 A 129527
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky
    Signatur:
    PvS 571.9
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
    Signatur:
    2022 A 1772
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    Part 1.Literary origins.Discontinuities in the evolution of Kolyma Stories and "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" /Michael A. Nicholson ;Poetry after the Gulag: do Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov have a lyric mindset? /Ulrich Schmid ;More than a cat : reflections on Shalamov's and Solzhenitsyn's writings through the perspective of trauma studies /Andrea Gullotta --Part 2.Memory and body.Why did Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov not write the Gulag Archipelago together? /Luba Jurgenson ;Tactility and memory in Shalamov /Fabian Heffermehl ;"Grudge-holding body": body and memory in the works of Varlam Shalamov /Franziska Thun-Hohenstein ;Certain properties of rhyme: poetic language touching abomination /Irina Sandomirskaia --Part 3.History and narrative.Counterfactuals and history in The Gulag Archipelago /Irina Karlsohn ;"The Gulag's Archipelago" : rhetoric of history /Elena Mikhailik ;Telling the stories of others and writing the bodies of others: the representation of women in Shalamov's Kolyma Stories and Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago /Josefina Lundblad-Janjić ;The issue of "softening" and the problem of addressivity in Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov /Leona Toker. "Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov are two of the best-known Gulag writers. After a short period of personal acquaintance, their lives and views on literature took different paths. Solzhenitsyn did not see a literary program in Shalamov's works, which he describes as "a result of exhaustion after years of hardship and hard labour in the camp". By understanding the text as a "result", Solzhenitsyn critically touched on a concept of evidence, which Shalamov several times emphasized as important to his own works. According to Shalamov, instead of the text being a re-presentation, it should be an extract from or substitute for the real or the factual, by which his Gulag experience became present once again. Concepts such as "document", "thing" and "fact" became important for Shalamov's self-identification as a modernist. At the same time, Solzhenitsyn, viewing his own task as one of restoring historical experiences of the Russian people and trying "to explain the slow course of history and what sort of one it has been", assumed the dual role of writer and historian, which inevitably raises the question of what characterizes the borders between fact and fiction in his works. It also raises question about dichotomies of historical and fictional truth"--

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Beteiligt: Heffermehl, Fabian (HerausgeberIn); Karlson, Irina (HerausgeberIn)
    Sprache: Englisch; Russisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Druck
    ISBN: 9789004468450
    Schriftenreihe: Studies in Slavic literature and poetics ; volume 63
    Schlagworte: Russian prose literature; Penal colonies in literature; Memory in literature
    Weitere Schlagworte: Solzhenit︠s︡yn, Aleksandr Isaevich (1918-2008); Shalamov, Varlam
    Umfang: XI, 296 Seiten
    Bemerkung(en):

    Includes bibliographical references and index

    Text teilweise in kyrillischer Schrift

    The inspiration for this book came from the international conference "The Gulag in Writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov: Fact, Document, Fiction", Uppsala University, Sweden, April 20-21, 2017. (Acknowledgements)
  3. The Gulag in writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov
    memory, history, testimony
    Beteiligt: Heffermehl, Fabian (Hrsg.); Karlson, Irina (Hrsg.)
    Erschienen: [2021]; © 2021
    Verlag:  Brill, Leiden ; Boston

    "Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov are two of the best-known Gulag writers. After a short period of personal acquaintance, their lives and views on literature took different paths. Solzhenitsyn did not see a literary program in Shalamov's... mehr

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Bamberg
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek der LMU München
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Regensburg
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    "Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov are two of the best-known Gulag writers. After a short period of personal acquaintance, their lives and views on literature took different paths. Solzhenitsyn did not see a literary program in Shalamov's works, which he describes as "a result of exhaustion after years of hardship and hard labour in the camp". By understanding the text as a "result", Solzhenitsyn critically touched on a concept of evidence, which Shalamov several times emphasized as important to his own works. According to Shalamov, instead of the text being a re-presentation, it should be an extract from or substitute for the real or the factual, by which his Gulag experience became present once again. Concepts such as "document", "thing" and "fact" became important for Shalamov's self-identification as a modernist. At the same time, Solzhenitsyn, viewing his own task as one of restoring historical experiences of the Russian people and trying "to explain the slow course of history and what sort of one it has been", assumed the dual role of writer and historian, which inevitably raises the question of what characterizes the borders between fact and fiction in his works. It also raises question about dichotomies of historical and fictional truth"

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
  4. The Gulag in writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov
    memory, history, testimony
    Beteiligt: Heffermehl, Fabian (Herausgeber); Karlson, Irina (Herausgeber)
    Erschienen: [2021]; © 2021
    Verlag:  Brill, Leiden ; Boston

    "Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov are two of the best-known Gulag writers. After a short period of personal acquaintance, their lives and views on literature took different paths. Solzhenitsyn did not see a literary program in Shalamov's... mehr

    Standort:
    Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Bonn
    Signatur:
    2021/4494
    Fernleihe:
    Ausleihe von Bänden möglich, keine Kopien

     

    "Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov are two of the best-known Gulag writers. After a short period of personal acquaintance, their lives and views on literature took different paths. Solzhenitsyn did not see a literary program in Shalamov's works, which he describes as "a result of exhaustion after years of hardship and hard labour in the camp". By understanding the text as a "result", Solzhenitsyn critically touched on a concept of evidence, which Shalamov several times emphasized as important to his own works. According to Shalamov, instead of the text being a re-presentation, it should be an extract from or substitute for the real or the factual, by which his Gulag experience became present once again. Concepts such as "document", "thing" and "fact" became important for Shalamov's self-identification as a modernist. At the same time, Solzhenitsyn, viewing his own task as one of restoring historical experiences of the Russian people and trying "to explain the slow course of history and what sort of one it has been", assumed the dual role of writer and historian, which inevitably raises the question of what characterizes the borders between fact and fiction in his works. It also raises question about dichotomies of historical and fictional truth"

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Beteiligt: Heffermehl, Fabian (Herausgeber); Karlson, Irina (Herausgeber)
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    ISBN: 9789004468450
    RVK Klassifikation: KK 7675
    Schriftenreihe: Studies in Slavic literature and poetics ; volume 63
    Schlagworte: Literatur; Straflager <Motiv>
    Weitere Schlagworte: Solženicyn, Aleksandr Isaevič (1918-2008); Šalamov, Varlam Tichonovič (1907-1982)
    Umfang: XI, 296 Seiten
    Bemerkung(en):

    Array: Array
  5. <<The>> Gulag in writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov
    memory, history, testimony
    Beteiligt: Heffermehl, Fabian (Hrsg.); Karlson, Irina (Hrsg.)
    Erschienen: [2021]
    Verlag:  Brill, Leiden

    "Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov are two of the best-known Gulag writers. After a short period of personal acquaintance, their lives and views on literature took different paths. Solzhenitsyn did not see a literary program in Shalamov's... mehr

     

    "Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov are two of the best-known Gulag writers. After a short period of personal acquaintance, their lives and views on literature took different paths. Solzhenitsyn did not see a literary program in Shalamov's works, which he describes as "a result of exhaustion after years of hardship and hard labour in the camp". By understanding the text as a "result", Solzhenitsyn critically touched on a concept of evidence, which Shalamov several times emphasized as important to his own works. According to Shalamov, instead of the text being a re-presentation, it should be an extract from or substitute for the real or the factual, by which his Gulag experience became present once again. Concepts such as "document", "thing" and "fact" became important for Shalamov's self-identification as a modernist. At the same time, Solzhenitsyn, viewing his own task as one of restoring historical experiences of the Russian people and trying "to explain the slow course of history and what sort of one it has been", assumed the dual role of writer and historian, which inevitably raises the question of what characterizes the borders between fact and fiction in his works. It also raises question about dichotomies of historical and fictional truth"--

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Beteiligt: Heffermehl, Fabian (Hrsg.); Karlson, Irina (Hrsg.)
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Konferenzschrift
    Format: Druck
    ISBN: 9789004468450; 9004468455
    Körperschaften/Kongresse: International Symposium The Gulag in Writings of Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov: Fact, Document, Fiction (2017, Uppsala)
    Schriftenreihe: Studies in Slavic literature and poetics ; volume 63
    Schlagworte: Solženicyn, Aleksandr Isaevič; Šalamov, Varlam Tichonovič; Straflager <Motiv>;
    Weitere Schlagworte: Solzhenit͡syn, Aleksandr Isaevich / 1918-2008 / Criticism and interpretation; Shalamov, Varlam / Criticism and interpretation; Russian prose literature / 20th century / History and criticism; Penal colonies in literature; Memory in literature; Shalamov, Varlam; Solzhenit͡syn, Aleksandr Isaevich / 1918-2008; Memory in literature; Penal colonies in literature; Russian prose literature; 1900-1999; Criticism, interpretation, etc
    Umfang: XI, 296 Seiten
    Bemerkung(en):

    Enthält Literaturangaben

    In den Acknowledgements: The inspiration for this book came from the international conference "The Gulag in writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov: Fact, document, fiction", Uppsala University, Sweden, April 20-21, 2017.

    Array: Array
  6. The Gulag in writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov
    memory, history, testimony
    Beteiligt: Heffermehl, Fabian (Hrsg.); Karlson, Irina (Hrsg.)
    Erschienen: [2021]; © 2021
    Verlag:  Brill, Leiden ; Boston

    "Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov are two of the best-known Gulag writers. After a short period of personal acquaintance, their lives and views on literature took different paths. Solzhenitsyn did not see a literary program in Shalamov's... mehr

    Standort:
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Universitätsbibliothek, Jacob-und-Wilhelm-Grimm-Zentrum
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Unter den Linden
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    "Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov are two of the best-known Gulag writers. After a short period of personal acquaintance, their lives and views on literature took different paths. Solzhenitsyn did not see a literary program in Shalamov's works, which he describes as "a result of exhaustion after years of hardship and hard labour in the camp". By understanding the text as a "result", Solzhenitsyn critically touched on a concept of evidence, which Shalamov several times emphasized as important to his own works. According to Shalamov, instead of the text being a re-presentation, it should be an extract from or substitute for the real or the factual, by which his Gulag experience became present once again. Concepts such as "document", "thing" and "fact" became important for Shalamov's self-identification as a modernist. At the same time, Solzhenitsyn, viewing his own task as one of restoring historical experiences of the Russian people and trying "to explain the slow course of history and what sort of one it has been", assumed the dual role of writer and historian, which inevitably raises the question of what characterizes the borders between fact and fiction in his works. It also raises question about dichotomies of historical and fictional truth"

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
  7. <<The>> Gulag in writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov
    memory, history, testimony
    Beteiligt: Heffermehl, Fabian (Herausgeber); Karlson, Irina (Herausgeber)
    Erschienen: [2021]; © 2021
    Verlag:  Brill, Leiden ; Boston

    "Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov are two of the best-known Gulag writers. After a short period of personal acquaintance, their lives and views on literature took different paths. Solzhenitsyn did not see a literary program in Shalamov's... mehr

    Standort:
    Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Bonn
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    "Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov are two of the best-known Gulag writers. After a short period of personal acquaintance, their lives and views on literature took different paths. Solzhenitsyn did not see a literary program in Shalamov's works, which he describes as "a result of exhaustion after years of hardship and hard labour in the camp". By understanding the text as a "result", Solzhenitsyn critically touched on a concept of evidence, which Shalamov several times emphasized as important to his own works. According to Shalamov, instead of the text being a re-presentation, it should be an extract from or substitute for the real or the factual, by which his Gulag experience became present once again. Concepts such as "document", "thing" and "fact" became important for Shalamov's self-identification as a modernist. At the same time, Solzhenitsyn, viewing his own task as one of restoring historical experiences of the Russian people and trying "to explain the slow course of history and what sort of one it has been", assumed the dual role of writer and historian, which inevitably raises the question of what characterizes the borders between fact and fiction in his works. It also raises question about dichotomies of historical and fictional truth"

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Beteiligt: Heffermehl, Fabian (Herausgeber); Karlson, Irina (Herausgeber)
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Druck
    ISBN: 9789004468450
    RVK Klassifikation: KK 7675
    Schriftenreihe: Studies in Slavic literature and poetics ; volume 63
    Schlagworte: Solženicyn, Aleksandr Isaevič; Šalamov, Varlam Tichonovič; Literatur; Straflager <Motiv>
    Umfang: XI, 296 Seiten
    Bemerkung(en):

    Michael A. Nicholson: Discontinuities in the evolution of Kolyma Stories and "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich"

    Ulrich Schmid: Poetry after the Gulag: do Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov have a lyric mindset?

    Andrea Gullotta: More than a cat : reflections on Shalamov's and Solzhenitsyn's writings through the perspective of trauma studies

    Luba Jurgenson: Why did Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov not write the Gulag Archipelago together?

    Fabian Heffermehl: Tactility and memory in Shalamov

    Franziska Thun-Hohenstein: "Grudge-holding body": body and memory in the works of Varlam Shalamov

    Irina Sandomirskaia: Certain properties of rhyme: poetic language touching abomination

    Irina Karlsohn: Counterfactuals and history in The Gulag Archipelago

    Elena Mikhailik: "The Gulag's Archipelago" : rhetoric of history

    Josefina Lundblad-Janjić: Telling the stories of others and writing the bodies of others: the representation of women in Shalamov's Kolyma Stories and Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago

    Leona Toker: The issue of "softening" and the problem of addressivity in Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov