Filtern nach
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 5 von 5.

  1. Différance in signifying Robinson Crusoe
    Defoe, Tournier, Coetzee and deconstructive re-visions of a myth
    Autor*in: Ren Haiyan
    Erschienen: 2014
    Verlag:  Lang, Bern [u.a.]

    Deconstructive rewritings are re-visions. This monograph engages Robinson Crusoe in tandem with two of its re-visions, Michel Tournier's Friday and J. M. Coetzee's Foe, from the perspective of the Enlightenment ideology. Basing the argument upon the... mehr

     

    Deconstructive rewritings are re-visions. This monograph engages Robinson Crusoe in tandem with two of its re-visions, Michel Tournier's Friday and J. M. Coetzee's Foe, from the perspective of the Enlightenment ideology. Basing the argument upon the assumption that Robinson Crusoe is a myth of the Enlightenment ideology representing the master narrative of the Enlightenment discourse, the book examines how the major ideological themes of the Enlightenment master narrative as manifested through the myth of Robinson Crusoe are rearticulated in Friday and Foe. It dismantles how these two re-visio

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9783035107395
    Umfang: Online-Ressource (193 S.)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Cover; Contents; Acknowledgements 7; Abbreviations 9; Introduction 11; 1 Robinson Crusoe: A Problematic Myth of the Enlightenment 25; 1.1 Understanding the Myth of Robinson Crusoe in the Context of the Enlightenment 27; 1.2 Robinson Crusoe: A Rational Colonialist 37; 1.3 Robinson Crusoe's Subjectivity: Romanticized Solitude and a Capitalist Utopia 57; 2 De(Re)-Mystifying the Subject: A World without Others Re-visioned 71; 2.1 Perversion: Robinson's Reproduction in a World without Others 72; 2.2 Metamorphosis: Tournier's Solution to Robinson's Dilemma 96

    3 From Defoe to Foe: Representation and Power in the Colonialist Context 1233.1 Susan Barton versus Friday: Feminism Interrogated 124; 3.2 Representation: Dispute and Compromise within Colonialist Discourse 136; 3.3 An Open Ending: The Invitation for Further Freeplay 157; Conclusion 167; Bibliography 177; Index 189

  2. Différance in Signifying Robinson Crusoe
    Defoe, Tournier, Coetzee and Deconstructive Re-visions of a Myth
    Autor*in: Ren, Haiyan
    Erschienen: 2014
    Verlag:  Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, Bern

    Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9783035107395
    Weitere Identifier:
    9783035107395
    RVK Klassifikation: HK 1935 ; HP 3341 ; IH 86161
    Auflage/Ausgabe: 1st, New ed
    Schlagworte: Rezeption; Dekonstruktion
    Weitere Schlagworte: Tournier, Michel (1924-2016): Vendredi ou les limbes du Pacifique; Coetzee, John M. (1940-): Foe; Defoe, Daniel (1660-1731): Robinson Crusoe
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (194 Seiten)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Online resource; title from title screen (viewed June 10, 2019)

    Deconstructive rewritings are re-visions. This monograph engages Robinson Crusoe in tandem with two of its re-visions, Michel Tournier's Friday and J. M. Coetzee's Foe, from the perspective of the Enlightenment ideology. Basing the argument upon the assumption that Robinson Crusoe is a myth of the Enlightenment ideology representing the master narrative of the Enlightenment discourse, the book examines how the major ideological themes of the Enlightenment master narrative as manifested through the myth of Robinson Crusoe are rearticulated in Friday and Foe. It dismantles how these two re-visions, through deconstructive freeplay, question and more importantly deconstruct the basic premises and principles, or the concepts that enjoy the full presence of an absolute signified in the myth of Robinson Crusoe. Thus these re-visions not only transform the logocentric repressive structure in Defoe's text into open-ended and dialogic discourses, they also partly constitute a chain of différance in signifying the myth of Robinson Crusoe. The author desires to generate large-scale understandings from small-scale insights through this research

  3. Différance in Signifying Robinson Crusoe
    Defoe, Tournier, Coetzee and Deconstructive Re-visions of a Myth
    Autor*in: Ren, Haiyan
    Erschienen: 2014
    Verlag:  Peter Lang, Bern

  4. Différance in Signifying Robinson Crusoe
    Defoe, Tournier, Coetzee and Deconstructive Re-visions of a Myth
    Autor*in: Ren Haiyan
    Erschienen: 2014
    Verlag:  Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, Bern

  5. Différance in Signifying Robinson Crusoe
    Autor*in: Ren, Haiyan
    Erschienen: 2014
    Verlag:  Peter Lang AG, Bern ; Peter Lang International Academic Publishers

    Deconstructive rewritings are re-visions. This monograph engages Robinson Crusoe in tandem with two of its re-visions, Michel Tournier’s Friday and J. M. Coetzee’s Foe, from the perspective of the Enlightenment ideology. Basing the argument upon the... mehr

    Zugang:
    Universitätsbibliothek Gießen
    keine Fernleihe

     

    Deconstructive rewritings are re-visions. This monograph engages Robinson Crusoe in tandem with two of its re-visions, Michel Tournier’s Friday and J. M. Coetzee’s Foe, from the perspective of the Enlightenment ideology. Basing the argument upon the assumption that Robinson Crusoe is a myth of the Enlightenment ideology representing the master narrative of the Enlightenment discourse, the book examines how the major ideological themes of the Enlightenment master narrative as manifested through the myth of Robinson Crusoe are rearticulated in Friday and Foe. It dismantles how these two re-visions, through deconstructive freeplay, question and more importantly deconstruct the basic premises and principles, or the concepts that enjoy the full presence of an absolute signified in the myth of Robinson Crusoe. Thus these re-visions not only transform the logocentric repressive structure in Defoe’s text into open-ended and dialogic discourses, they also partly constitute a chain of différance in signifying the myth of Robinson Crusoe. The author desires to generate large-scale understandings from small-scale insights through this research.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9783035107395
    Weitere Identifier:
    DDC Klassifikation: Literatur und Rhetorik (800)
    Auflage/Ausgabe: 1st, New ed.
    Schlagworte: Rezeption; Dekonstruktion
    Weitere Schlagworte: Defoe, Daniel (1660-1731): Robinson Crusoe; Tournier, Michel (1924-2016): Vendredi ou les limbes du Pacifique; Coetzee, J. M. (1940-): Foe
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource