Direkt zur Hauptnavigation springen Direkt zum Inhalt springen
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 5 von 5.

  1. A systematic theory of argumentation
    the pragma-dialectical approach
    Autor*in: Eemeren, F. H. van
    Erschienen: 2004
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a... mehr

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Bamberg
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a theoretical tool for analysing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. They develop a method for the reconstruction of argumentative discourse that takes into account all aspects that are relevant to a critical assessment. They also propose a practical code of behaviour for discussants who want to resolve their differences in a reasonable way. This is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9780511616389
    Weitere Identifier:
    RVK Klassifikation: CC 2500 ; CC 4800 ; EC 4150 ; ES 675
    Schlagworte: Persuasion (Rhetoric); Pragmatics; Dialectic (Philosophy); Argumentationstheorie; Argumentation; Rhetorik
    Umfang: 1 online resource (vii, 216 pages)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)
  2. A systematic theory of argumentation
    the pragma-dialectical approach
    Autor*in: van Eemeren, Frans H.; Grootendorst, Robert
    Erschienen: 2004.
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a... mehr

    Standort:
    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    Signatur:
    E-Book CUP HSFK
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Potsdamer Straße
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Technische Universität Chemnitz, Universitätsbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    E-Book CUP HSFK
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt / Zentrale
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Bibliothek - Niedersächsische Landesbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Medien- und Informationszentrum, Universitätsbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Bibliotheks-und Informationssystem der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (BIS)
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Rostock
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Württembergische Landesbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek der Eberhard Karls Universität
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

     

    In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a theoretical tool for analysing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. They develop a method for the reconstruction of argumentative discourse that takes into account all aspects that are relevant to a critical assessment. They also propose a practical code of behaviour for discussants who want to resolve their differences in a reasonable way. This is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
    Quelle: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9780511616389
    Weitere Identifier:
    RVK Klassifikation: EC 4100 ; CC 2500 ; ES 675
    Schlagworte: Pragmatics; Dialectic (Philosophy); Persuasion (Rhetoric); Persuasion (Rhetoric); Pragmatics; Dialectic (Philosophy)
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (vii, 216 pages), digital, PDF file(s).
    Bemerkung(en):

    Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)
  3. A systematic theory of argumentation
    the pragma-dialectical approach
    Autor*in: Eemeren, Frans Hendrik van
    Erschienen: 2004
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, New York

    "In A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, two of the leading figures in argumentation theory, Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of... mehr

    Zugang:
    Aggregator (lizenzpflichtig)

    Standort:
    Hochschule Aalen, Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    E-Book EBSCO
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Hochschule Esslingen, Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    E-Book Ebsco
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Saarländische Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek der Eberhard Karls Universität
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    "In A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, two of the leading figures in argumentation theory, Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a "critical discussion" serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating, and producing argumentative discourse. In this approach, pragmatic and dialectical insights are combined by conceiving a critical discussion as a methodological exchange of speech acts between two parties." "A Systematic Theory of Argumentation is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy."--Jacket 1. Introduction -- 2. The realm of argumentation studies -- 3. A model of a critical discussion -- 4. Relevance -- 5. Analysis as reconstruction -- 6. Rules for a critical discussion -- 7. Fallacies.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
  4. A systematic theory of argumentation
    the pragma-dialectical approach
    Autor*in: van Eemeren, Frans H.; Grootendorst, Robert
    Erschienen: 2004.
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a... mehr

    Standort:
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Unter den Linden
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a theoretical tool for analysing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. They develop a method for the reconstruction of argumentative discourse that takes into account all aspects that are relevant to a critical assessment. They also propose a practical code of behaviour for discussants who want to resolve their differences in a reasonable way. This is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
    Quelle: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9780511616389
    Weitere Identifier:
    RVK Klassifikation: EC 4100 ; CC 2500 ; ES 675
    Schlagworte: Pragmatics; Dialectic (Philosophy); Persuasion (Rhetoric); Persuasion (Rhetoric); Pragmatics; Dialectic (Philosophy)
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (vii, 216 pages), digital, PDF file(s).
    Bemerkung(en):

    Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)
  5. A systematic theory of argumentation
    the pragma-dialectical approach
    Autor*in: Eemeren, Frans H. van; Grootendorst, R.
    Erschienen: 2004
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a... mehr

    Zugang:

    Standort:
    Universität Frankfurt, Elektronische Ressourcen
    Signatur:
    /
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Gießen
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a theoretical tool for analysing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. They develop a method for the reconstruction of argumentative discourse that takes into account all aspects that are relevant to a critical assessment. They also propose a practical code of behaviour for discussants who want to resolve their differences in a reasonable way. This is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9780511616389
    RVK Klassifikation: CC 2500 ; ES 675 ; EC 4100
    Schlagworte: Rhetorik; Sprachphilosophie; Dialektik; Argumentationstheorie
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (vii, 216 pages)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)