Direkt zur Hauptnavigation springen Direkt zum Inhalt springen
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Filtern nach
Aktive Filter
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 2 von 2.

  1. Sovereignty after empire
    comparing the Middle East and Central Asia
    Erschienen: ©2011
    Verlag:  Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Standort:
    Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Amberg-Weiden / Hochschulbibliothek Amberg
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Amberg-Weiden, Hochschulbibliothek, Standort Weiden
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 0748647546; 0748664327; 0748675396; 1283252791; 9780748647545; 9780748664320; 9780748675395; 9781283252799
    RVK Klassifikation: MG 84086 ; MH 60086 ; MK 2700
    Schlagworte: History; Political Science; POLITICAL SCIENCE / Essays; POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General; POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / National; POLITICAL SCIENCE / Reference; POLITICAL SCIENCE / General; Colonial influence; Political science; Postcolonialism; Sovereignty; Geschichte; Politische Wissenschaft; Sovereignty; Postcolonialism; Postkolonialismus; Souveränität; Kolonialismus; Kulturvergleich
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (xi, 396 pages)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Includes bibliographical references (pages 346-390) and index

    "A comparative study of empire in the Middle East and Central Asia. Empire matters for post-imperial outcomes, as is shown in this comparative study. The imperial creation of states in MENA and Central Asia explains several similarities in both regions' successor states. Differences in imperial heritages also partly account for the greater instability of the MENA states system and their lesser legitimacy. While eventually the imperial relation to an external metropole came to an end, the social patterns and institutional practices forged in these relationships remained; some only as traces, but others that endured in the transformation of empire into something else, a national sovereignty which should be seen as more than 'neo-colonialism' but less than 'total independence'. This challenges the view of an automatic linear progression from empire to sovereignty and indeed, suggests the two conditions can and do co-exist. Key Features *Combines theory and empirical evidence *Makes systematic comparisons between the Middle East and Central Asia *Includes chapters from leading scholars from history, politics and international relations *Presents the findings of a focused collective research project."--Provided by publisher
  2. Sovereignty after empire
    comparing the Middle East and Central Asia
    Beteiligt: Cummings, Sally N.; Hinnebusch, Raymond
    Erschienen: 2011
    Verlag:  Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh ; EBSCO Industries, Inc., Birmingham, AL, USA

    "A comparative study of empire in the Middle East and Central Asia. Empire matters for post-imperial outcomes, as is shown in this comparative study. The imperial creation of states in MENA and Central Asia explains several similarities in both... mehr

    Standort:
    Bibliothek der Hochschule Mainz, Untergeschoss
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    "A comparative study of empire in the Middle East and Central Asia. Empire matters for post-imperial outcomes, as is shown in this comparative study. The imperial creation of states in MENA and Central Asia explains several similarities in both regions' successor states. Differences in imperial heritages also partly account for the greater instability of the MENA states system and their lesser legitimacy. While eventually the imperial relation to an external metropole came to an end, the social patterns and institutional practices forged in these relationships remained; some only as traces, but others that endured in the transformation of empire into something else, a national sovereignty which should be seen as more than 'neo-colonialism' but less than 'total independence'. This challenges the view of an automatic linear progression from empire to sovereignty and indeed, suggests the two conditions can and do co-exist. Key Features *Combines theory and empirical evidence *Makes systematic comparisons between the Middle East and Central Asia *Includes chapters from leading scholars from history, politics and international relations *Presents the findings of a focused collective research project."--Provided by publisher.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Beteiligt: Cummings, Sally N.; Hinnebusch, Raymond
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9780748647545; 0748647546; 9780748675395; 0748675396; 9780748664320; 0748664327; 1283252791; 9781283252799
    Schlagworte: Postkolonialismus
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (xi, 396 pages)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Includes bibliographical references (pages 346-390) and index