Direkt zur Hauptnavigation springen Direkt zum Inhalt springen
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 5 von 5.

  1. How to measure the quality of judicial reasoning
    Beteiligt: Bencze, Mátyás (HerausgeberIn); Ng, Gar Yein (HerausgeberIn)
    Erschienen: [2018]; © 2018
    Verlag:  Springer, Cham

    This edited volume examines the very essence of the function of judges, building upon developments in the quality of justice research throughout Europe. Distinguished authors address a gap in the literature by considering the standards that... mehr

    Standort:
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Unter den Linden
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    This edited volume examines the very essence of the function of judges, building upon developments in the quality of justice research throughout Europe. Distinguished authors address a gap in the literature by considering the standards that individual judgments should meet, presenting both academic and practical perspectives. Readers are invited to consider such questions as: What is expected from judicial reasoning? Is there a general concept of good quality with regard to judicial reasoning? Are there any attempts being made to measure the quality of judicial reasoning? The focus here is on judges meeting the highest standards possible in adjudication and how they may be held to account for the way they reason. The contributions examine theoretical questions surrounding the measurement of the quality of judicial reasoning, practices and legal systems across Europe, and judicial reasoning in various international courts. Six legal systems in Europe are featured: England and Wales, Finland, Italy, the Czech Republic, France and Hungary as well as three non-domestic levels of court jurisdictions, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The depth and breadth of subject matter presented in this volume ensure its relevance for many years to come. All those with an interest in benchmarking the quality of judicial reasoning, including judges themselves, academics, students and legal practitioners, can find something of value in this book

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Beteiligt: Bencze, Mátyás (HerausgeberIn); Ng, Gar Yein (HerausgeberIn)
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Druck
    ISBN: 9783319973159; 9783030073336
    Weitere Identifier:
    9783319973159
    Schriftenreihe: Ius gentium ; volume 69
    Schlagworte: Justice, Administration of; Judicial process; Justice, Administration of; Judicial process
    Umfang: viii, 268 Seiten
    Bemerkung(en):

    Hier auch später erschienene, unveränderte Nachdrucke
  2. How to Measure the Quality of Judicial Reasoning
    Beteiligt: Bencze, Mátyás (Hrsg.); Ng, Gar Yein (Hrsg.)
    Erschienen: 2018
    Verlag:  Springer International Publishing, Cham ; Springer

    Standort:
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Universitätsbibliothek, Jacob-und-Wilhelm-Grimm-Zentrum
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Beteiligt: Bencze, Mátyás (Hrsg.); Ng, Gar Yein (Hrsg.)
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    ISBN: 9783319973159; 3319973150
    Weitere Identifier:
    9783319973159
    RVK Klassifikation: PI 3020
    Auflage/Ausgabe: 1st edition 2018
    Schriftenreihe: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ; 69
    Schlagworte: Auslegung; Rechtsprechende Gewalt; Qualität
    Weitere Schlagworte: LB; LB
    Umfang: viii, 268 Seiten, 23.5 cm x 15.5 cm
  3. How to measure the quality of judicial reasoning
    Beteiligt: Bencze, Mátyás (Hrsg.); Ng, Gar Yein (Hrsg.)
    Erschienen: [2018]; © 2018
    Verlag:  Springer International Publishing, Cham ; Springer

    Standort:
    Freie Universität Berlin, Universitätsbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus - Senftenberg, Universitätsbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Volltext (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Quelle: Philologische Bibliothek, FU Berlin
    Beteiligt: Bencze, Mátyás (Hrsg.); Ng, Gar Yein (Hrsg.)
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9783319973166
    Weitere Identifier:
    RVK Klassifikation: PI 3020
    Schriftenreihe: Ius Gentium: Comparative perspectives on law and justice ; 69
    Schlagworte: Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law; Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History; Qualität; Rechtsprechende Gewalt; Auslegung
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (VIII, 268 p)
  4. How to Measure the Quality of Judicial Reasoning
    Beteiligt: Bencze, Mátyás (HerausgeberIn); Ng, Gar Yein (HerausgeberIn)
    Erschienen: 2018
    Verlag:  Springer International Publishing, Cham

    This edited volume examines the very essence of the function of judges, building upon developments in the quality of justice research throughout Europe. Distinguished authors address a gap in the literature by considering the standards that... mehr

    Standort:
    Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Bibliothek
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Hochschule Hamm-Lippstadt, Bibliothek Hamm
    Signatur:
    eBook Springer
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg (BSZ)
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

    Standort:
    Hochschule Hamm-Lippstadt, Bibliothek Lippstadt
    Signatur:
    eBook Springer
    Fernleihe:
    keine Fernleihe

     

    This edited volume examines the very essence of the function of judges, building upon developments in the quality of justice research throughout Europe. Distinguished authors address a gap in the literature by considering the standards that individual judgments should meet, presenting both academic and practical perspectives. Readers are invited to consider such questions as: What is expected from judicial reasoning? Is there a general concept of good quality with regard to judicial reasoning? Are there any attempts being made to measure the quality of judicial reasoning? The focus here is on judges meeting the highest standards possible in adjudication and how they may be held to account for the way they reason. The contributions examine theoretical questions surrounding the measurement of the quality of judicial reasoning, practices and legal systems across Europe, and judicial reasoning in various international courts. Six legal systems in Europe are featured: England and Wales, Finland, Italy, the Czech Republic, France and Hungary as well as three non-domestic levels of court jurisdictions, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The depth and breadth of subject matter presented in this volume ensure its relevance for many years to come. All those with an interest in benchmarking the quality of judicial reasoning, including judges themselves, academics, students and legal practitioners, can find something of value in this book Chapter 1. Measuring the Unmeasurable? -- Chapter 2. Judging and the Ethical Life -- Chapter 3. How to Measure? An Essay on the Social Context of Quality Measuring Quality -- Chapter 4. Judicial reasoning from the Perspective of Behavioural Law and Economics -- Chapter 5. Quality of Justice and Lay Participation in Light of Scientific Studies -- Chapter 6. Obstacles and Opportunities - Measuring the Quality of Judicial Reasoning -- Chapter 7. Quality of Judicial Reasoning: England & Wales -- Chapter 8. Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in Italy -- Chapter 9. The Quality of Adjudication in France -- Chapter 10. Quality of Legal Decisions: The Criteria Established by the Finnish Judiciary -- Chapter 11. Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in the Czech Republic -- Chapter 12. Methods of Quality Assessment of Judicial Reasoning in Hungary -- Chapter 13 Quality of Reasoning in International Criminal Tribunals -- Chapter 14. The Quality of Decision-Making at the Court of Justice of the European Union -- Chapter 15. Reflections on Legal Reasoning in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Beteiligt: Bencze, Mátyás (HerausgeberIn); Ng, Gar Yein (HerausgeberIn)
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9783319973166
    Weitere Identifier:
    Schriftenreihe: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ; 69
    Array
    Schlagworte: Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law; Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law
    Umfang: Online-Ressource (VIII, 268 p, online resource)
  5. How to measure the quality of judicial reasoning
    Beteiligt: Bencze, Mátyás (HerausgeberIn); Ng, Gar Yein (HerausgeberIn)
    Erschienen: [2018]; © 2018
    Verlag:  Springer, Cham

    This edited volume examines the very essence of the function of judges, building upon developments in the quality of justice research throughout Europe. Distinguished authors address a gap in the literature by considering the standards that... mehr

    Standort:
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Potsdamer Straße
    Signatur:
    10 A 81715
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen
    Signatur:
    h jur 027 bkm/122
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

    Standort:
    Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg
    Signatur:
    SW 2021/1491
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

    Standort:
    Max-Planck-Institut für ethnologische Forschung, Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    K2146 Benc2018
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

    Standort:
    Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    Rvgl: XV B: 156
    Fernleihe:
    keine Ausleihe von Bänden, nur Papierkopien werden versandt

    Standort:
    Bundesverfassungsgericht, Bibliothek
    Signatur:
    CC 2441
    Fernleihe:
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    This edited volume examines the very essence of the function of judges, building upon developments in the quality of justice research throughout Europe. Distinguished authors address a gap in the literature by considering the standards that individual judgments should meet, presenting both academic and practical perspectives. Readers are invited to consider such questions as: What is expected from judicial reasoning? Is there a general concept of good quality with regard to judicial reasoning? Are there any attempts being made to measure the quality of judicial reasoning? The focus here is on judges meeting the highest standards possible in adjudication and how they may be held to account for the way they reason. The contributions examine theoretical questions surrounding the measurement of the quality of judicial reasoning, practices and legal systems across Europe, and judicial reasoning in various international courts. Six legal systems in Europe are featured: England and Wales, Finland, Italy, the Czech Republic, France and Hungary as well as three non-domestic levels of court jurisdictions, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The depth and breadth of subject matter presented in this volume ensure its relevance for many years to come. All those with an interest in benchmarking the quality of judicial reasoning, including judges themselves, academics, students and legal practitioners, can find something of value in this book

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Beteiligt: Bencze, Mátyás (HerausgeberIn); Ng, Gar Yein (HerausgeberIn)
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Druck
    ISBN: 9783319973159; 9783030073336
    Weitere Identifier:
    9783319973159
    Schriftenreihe: Ius gentium ; volume 69
    Schlagworte: Justice, Administration of; Judicial process; Justice, Administration of; Judicial process
    Umfang: viii, 268 Seiten
    Bemerkung(en):

    Hier auch später erschienene, unveränderte Nachdrucke