Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 8 of 8.

  1. Flüchtige Territorien
    = Fleeting territories
    Published: [2017]
    Publisher:  Verlag für Moderne Kunst, Wien

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Source: Union catalogues
    Contributor: Krejs, Christiane (Publisher); Richter, Maren (Publisher); Schafler, Klaus (Publisher); Blakeney, Peter; Schöffler, Christine
    Language: German; English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Print
    ISBN: 9783903228085
    Other identifier:
    9783903228085
    RVK Categories: LH 65880 ; LH 84995
    DDC Categories: 700
    Subjects: Politik <Motiv>; Territorium <Motiv>; Wirtschaft <Motiv>; Ökologie <Motiv>; Kunst; Geschichte 2004-2017;
    Other subjects: Kunstraum Niederoesterreich; Politik; Recht
    Scope: 61 Seiten, Illustrationen, 21 cm
    Notes:

    Erschienen anlässlich der Ausstellung "Flüchtige Territorien" im Kunstraum Niederösterreich, 29. September bis 9. Dezember 2017, kuratiert von Maren Richter und Klaus Schafler

  2. Hawk-talk in island disputes
    a theoretical analysis with an application to Japan and Korea
    Published: Winter 2017

    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Article (journal)
    Format: Print
    Parent title: Enthalten in: The Chinese journal of international politics; Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 2006; 10(2017), 4, Seite 403-428

    Subjects: Internationaler Konflikt; Interessenkonflikt; Territorium; Internationale Politik; Politisches Verhalten; Entwicklungsphase; Theorie; Spieltheorie
  3. Der Krieg Aserbaidschans gegen Berg-Karabach im April 2016 aus völkerrechtlicher Sicht
    Published: Juni 2017

    Summary: "In early April 2016, serious clashes took place between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces along the Nagorno-Karabakh armistice line drawn in May 1994. Before the international community could fully register what had happened and what it mean,... more

    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Informationszentrum der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik e.V.
    No inter-library loan
    Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Bibliothek
    No loan of volumes, only paper copies will be sent
    Bundesverfassungsgericht, Bibliothek
    In: ZO 25
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

     

    Summary: "In early April 2016, serious clashes took place between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces along the Nagorno-Karabakh armistice line drawn in May 1994. Before the international community could fully register what had happened and what it mean, the so-called "fourday war" came to an end through Russian mediation, and the ceasefire was restored grosso modo to its former conditions. However, the controversial question of which party had started the military attacks remained unresolved amidst mutual allegations on both sides. Other interested parties and those involved in managing the Karabakh conflict not only preferred to keep silent, but diplomatically refused to pick sides, instead firmly asking the parties to adhere to the armistice regime. Against this backdrop the article seeks to examine some key public international law problems raised in connection with the "April War". However, it is first necessary to answer the question of which side broke the ceasefire agreements by taking military action and crossing the "line of contact". After thorough analysis of all the relevant aspects, the article comes to the conclusion that it was Azerbaijan who launched a carefully planned and prepared large-scale surprise attack in an attempt to move the "line of contact" as far as possible to the west and thereby substantially extend its control over Karabakh-ruled territory. The question deriving from that, whether Azerbaijan by its attack has violated the general prohibition of use of force in international relations, is to be answered in the affirmative, for two reasons. First, under public international law the prohibition of use of force applies also to de facto States (or stabilized de facto regimes); Nagorno-Karabakh meets the relevant criteria, i.e. an effective government, as well as a certain degree of integration into international relations, in its case mainly by being a party of the tripartite ceasefire agreements of 11th May 1994 and 6th February 1995. Second, Azerbaijan has violated the general prohibition of use of force by breaking these ceasefire agreements, especially given that the 1970 Friendly Relations Declaration particularly emphasizes violations of international lines of demarcation as an infringement of Art. 2(4) of the Charter of the United Nations. Since Azerbaijan cannot justify its military action under public international law, Nagorno-Karabakh's counterattacks, as well as their support from the Republic of Armenia, are justified by the right to (collective) self-defence (Art. 51 UN Charter)."

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: German
    Media type: Article (journal)
    Format: Print
    Parent title: Enthalten in: Archiv des Völkerrechts; Tübingen : Mohr, 1948; 55(2017), 2, Seite 185-233

    Subjects: Internationaler Konflikt; Interessenkonflikt; Territorium; Territorialer Anspruch; Enklave; Bewaffneter Konflikt; Krieg; Verlauf; Kriegführung; Rechtfertigung; Angriff; Rechtsstellung; Völkerrecht; Auslegung; Rechtsnorm
  4. Homeland security
    territorial myths and ontological security in the European Union
    Published: July 2017

    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Article (journal)
    Format: Print
    Parent title: Enthalten in: Journal of European integration; Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1998; 39(2017), 5, Seite 545-558

    Subjects: Mitgliedsstaaten; Europäische Integration; Internationale Organisation; Entwicklung; Politisches Mandat; Gruppenidentität; Identitätsentwicklung; Territorium; Mythos; Narrativität; Implikation; Bedrohungsvorstellung; Innere Sicherheit; Beispiel; Tendenz
  5. A political theory of territory
    Published: 2017
    Publisher:  Oxford University Press, Oxford

    "Margaret Moore attempts here to offer a comprehensive normative theory of territory. The book provides an account both of the nature of rights to territory and of the nature of the right-holder, considering the arguments that might justify state... more

    Lehrstuhl und Institut für Politische Wissenschaft, Bibliothek
    613:Ideen 9000/68
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Universität Münster, Philosophisches Seminar, Bibliothek
    G 779/564/500
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

     

    "Margaret Moore attempts here to offer a comprehensive normative theory of territory. The book provides an account both of the nature of rights to territory and of the nature of the right-holder, considering the arguments that might justify state territory as well as the appropriate relationship between the state, the people, and the land implied by that justificatory argument. After setting out the basics of the theory in the initial chapters, the author then compares her view to the main competing rival views (cultural nationalist and statist) and explains how her view handles the issues of boundary setting, corrective justice, natural resources, immigration and defensive rights. The volume provides the reader with a clear sense both of the existing state of the philosophical literature on territorial rights and of Moore's own views"-- "Our world is currently divided into territorial states that resist all attempts to change their borders. But what entitles a state, or the people it represents, to assume monopoly control over a particular piece of the Earth's surface? Why are they allowed to prevent others from entering? What if two or more states, or two or more groups of people, claim the same piece of land? Political philosophy, which has had a great deal to say about the relationship between state and citizen, has largely ignored these questions about territory. This book provides answers. It justifies the idea of territory itself in terms of the moral value of political self-determination; it also justifies, within limits, those elements that we normally associate with territorial rights: rights of jurisdiction, rights over resources, right to control borders and so on. The book offers normative guidance over a number of important issues facing us today, all of which involve territory and territorial rights, but which are currently dealt with by ad hoc reasoning: disputes over resources; disputes over boundaries, oceans, unoccupied islands, and the frozen Arctic; disputes rooted in historical injustices with regard to land; secessionist conflicts; and irredentist conflicts. In a world in which there is continued pressure on borders and control over resources, from prospective migrants and from the desperate poor, and no coherent theory of territory to think through these problems, this book offers an original, systematic, and sophisticated theory of why territory matters, who has rights over territory, and the scope and limits of these rights. "This is a well-written, well-argued book on an extraordinarily important and until recently neglected topic.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    ISBN: 9780190845797
    RVK Categories: LB 52000 ; MD 4300 ; EC 1879
    Series: Oxford political philosophy
    Subjects: Politische Philosophie; Territorium; Staatslehre
    Other subjects: Array; Array; Array
    Scope: xii, 263 Seiten
    Notes:

    Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 245 - 256 und Index

  6. Der Krieg Aserbaidschans gegen Berg-Karabach im April 2016 aus völkerrechtlicher Sicht
    Published: Juni 2017

    Summary: "In early April 2016, serious clashes took place between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces along the Nagorno-Karabakh armistice line drawn in May 1994. Before the international community could fully register what had happened and what it mean,... more

    Informationszentrum der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik e.V.
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

     

    Summary: "In early April 2016, serious clashes took place between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces along the Nagorno-Karabakh armistice line drawn in May 1994. Before the international community could fully register what had happened and what it mean, the so-called "fourday war" came to an end through Russian mediation, and the ceasefire was restored grosso modo to its former conditions. However, the controversial question of which party had started the military attacks remained unresolved amidst mutual allegations on both sides. Other interested parties and those involved in managing the Karabakh conflict not only preferred to keep silent, but diplomatically refused to pick sides, instead firmly asking the parties to adhere to the armistice regime. Against this backdrop the article seeks to examine some key public international law problems raised in connection with the "April War". However, it is first necessary to answer the question of which side broke the ceasefire agreements by taking military action and crossing the "line of contact". After thorough analysis of all the relevant aspects, the article comes to the conclusion that it was Azerbaijan who launched a carefully planned and prepared large-scale surprise attack in an attempt to move the "line of contact" as far as possible to the west and thereby substantially extend its control over Karabakh-ruled territory. The question deriving from that, whether Azerbaijan by its attack has violated the general prohibition of use of force in international relations, is to be answered in the affirmative, for two reasons. First, under public international law the prohibition of use of force applies also to de facto States (or stabilized de facto regimes); Nagorno-Karabakh meets the relevant criteria, i.e. an effective government, as well as a certain degree of integration into international relations, in its case mainly by being a party of the tripartite ceasefire agreements of 11th May 1994 and 6th February 1995. Second, Azerbaijan has violated the general prohibition of use of force by breaking these ceasefire agreements, especially given that the 1970 Friendly Relations Declaration particularly emphasizes violations of international lines of demarcation as an infringement of Art. 2(4) of the Charter of the United Nations. Since Azerbaijan cannot justify its military action under public international law, Nagorno-Karabakh's counterattacks, as well as their support from the Republic of Armenia, are justified by the right to (collective) self-defence (Art. 51 UN Charter)."

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: German
    Media type: Article (journal)
    Format: Print
    Parent title: Enthalten in: Archiv des Völkerrechts; Tübingen : Mohr, 1948; 55(2017), 2, Seite 185-233

    Subjects: Internationaler Konflikt; Interessenkonflikt; Territorium; Territorialer Anspruch; Enklave; Bewaffneter Konflikt; Krieg; Verlauf; Kriegführung; Rechtfertigung; Angriff; Rechtsstellung; Völkerrecht; Auslegung; Rechtsnorm
  7. Public culture, cultural identity, cultural policy
    comparative perspectives
    Published: [2017]
    Publisher:  Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    No loan of volumes, only paper copies will be sent
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Potsdamer Straße
    1 A 993476
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Bibliothek der Andrássy Gyula Deutschsprachigen Universität Budapest
    No loan of volumes, only paper copies will be sent
    Institut für Auslandsbeziehungen, Bibliothek
    37/8
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Institut für Auslandsbeziehungen, Bibliothek
    37/8
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Universitätsbibliothek der Eberhard Karls Universität
    57 A 1374
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Source: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Print
    ISBN: 9781137398611
    Other identifier:
    RVK Categories: MF 9300 ; MG 42930
    Subjects: Kulturpolitik; Relation; Kulturelle Identität; Nationalbewusstsein; Politische Kultur; Kulturförderung; Regierung; Region; Territorium
    Scope: li, 201 Seiten
  8. Global Africa
    into the twenty-first century
    Contributor: Hodgson, Dorothy L. (HerausgeberIn); Byfield, Judith A. (HerausgeberIn)
    Published: [2017]; © 2017
    Publisher:  University of California Press, Oakland, California

    "Global Africa will complicate conventional views of Africa as a place of violence, despair and victimhood--a place and space that other people, states, and organizations act on and steal from. Instead, they aim to document some of the significant... more

    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Bibliothek
    303.4 G5621
    No inter-library loan
    Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung multireligiöser und multiethnischer Gesellschaften, Bibliothek
    LB 39465 Hodg 2017
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky
    ETH-Af Mig 5.102
    No inter-library loan
    Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB) / Leibniz-Informationszentrum Technik und Naturwissenschaften und Universitätsbibliothek
    WI 100 55
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Universität Konstanz, Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Institut für Auslandsbeziehungen, Bibliothek
    38/13
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Universitätsbibliothek der Eberhard Karls Universität
    58 A 6826
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

     

    "Global Africa will complicate conventional views of Africa as a place of violence, despair and victimhood--a place and space that other people, states, and organizations act on and steal from. Instead, they aim to document some of the significant global connections, circulations, and contributions that African people, ideas, and goods have made in the world--not just in the United States, but in South Asia, Latin America, Europe, and elsewhere. They will showcase new framings of Africa, but will not romanticize the conditions and circumstances in which too many people on the continent currently live. The essays in this volume will amplify those voices that offer complex and insightful explanations, strategies for solutions, and inspiration for the future."--Provided by publisher Entangled histories -- Power and its challenges -- Circulations of communities and cultures -- Science, technology, and health -- Africa in the world today

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file