Narrow Search
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 2 of 2.

  1. Sectoral aid priorities
    are donors really doing their best to achieve the millennium development goals?
    Published: Jan. 2006
    Publisher:  Institute for World Economics, Kiel

    We analyze the aid portfolio of various bilateral and multilateral donors, testing whether they have prioritised aid in line with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). In doing so, we combine sectorally disaggregated aid data with indicators... more

    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    No inter-library loan
    Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen
    No inter-library loan
    Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen
    No inter-library loan
    Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Kiel, Zentralbibliothek
    EWP 1
    No inter-library loan
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    No inter-library loan

     

    We analyze the aid portfolio of various bilateral and multilateral donors, testing whether they have prioritised aid in line with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). In doing so, we combine sectorally disaggregated aid data with indicators reflecting the situation of recipient countries regarding the MDGs. Our results show that donors differ not only in terms of their overall generosity and the general poverty orientation of aid, but also in the extent to which their sectoral aid allocation is conducive to achieving more specific MDGs such as all children completing a full course of primary schooling, reducing child and maternal mortality as well as reversing the spread of HIV/AIDS. Overall, while some MDGs, e.g., the fight against HIV/AIDS, have shaped the allocation of aid, the sector-specific results reveal that with respect to other MDGs, most notably primary education, there is a considerable gap between donor rhetoric and actual aid allocation. These results invite the conclusion that the current focus on substantially increasing aid in order to turn the tide in trying to achieve the MDGs misses one important point: Unless the targeting of aid is improved, higher aid will not have the desired effects. Our results suggest that at least part of the blame for missing the MDGs falls on insufficient targeting of aid.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
  2. Corrupt governments receive less bilateral aid
    governance and the delivery of foreign aid through non-government actors
    Published: January 2014
    Publisher:  Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel

    A core result of the aid allocation literature is that the quality of governance in recipient countries does not affect the amounts of foreign aid received. Donor countries may still give aid to poorly-governed countries because of a dilemma they... more

    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    No inter-library loan
    Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen
    No inter-library loan
    Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen
    No inter-library loan
    Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Bundesverfassungsgericht, Bibliothek
    Online-Ressource
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Kiel, Zentralbibliothek
    EWP 1
    No inter-library loan
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DS 3 (1901)
    No inter-library loan

     

    A core result of the aid allocation literature is that the quality of governance in recipient countries does not affect the amounts of foreign aid received. Donor countries may still give aid to poorly-governed countries because of a dilemma they face: those countries most in need typically also lack proper institutions. This paper argues that donors try to resolve this dilemma by delivering aid through non-state actors. Using aid shares as well as absolute amounts of aid allocated through different channels and considering different dimensions of governance, we provide evidence that bypassing governments via NGOs and multilateral organizations is indeed a response to weak recipient state institutions. The effect is stronger in aid sectors where donors can more easily switch between channels, and for the group of donors that have been dubbed ‘like-minded’ to indicate their specific focus on recipient need.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/92371
    Series: Kiel Working Paper ; No. 1901
    Subjects: Kreditgeber; Weltwirtschaft; Entwicklungshilfe; Good Governance; Kausalität; Korruption; Nichtstaatliche Organisation; Governance; Entwicklungsmodell
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (29 Seiten), Diagramme
    Notes:

    Gesehen am 26.04.2017