Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Narrow Search
Search narrowed by
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 3 of 3.

  1. Analytical Strategy for Dealing with Neutrality Claims and Implicit Masculinity Constructions: Methodological Challenges for Gender Studies in Science and Technology
    Author: Paulitz, Tanja; Kink, Susanne; Prietl, Bianca
    Published: 2016

    Abstract: On the basis of an empirical example, we offer in this article a methodological discussion of the challenges and pitfalls gender studies scholars face when analyzing how gender norms are attributed to epistemic cultures in science and... more

     

    Abstract: On the basis of an empirical example, we offer in this article a methodological discussion of the challenges and pitfalls gender studies scholars face when analyzing how gender norms are attributed to epistemic cultures in science and engineering. Faced with actors who claim neutrality and objectivity for themselves and their work, the challenge is to analyze gender norms that are mostly implicit without reifying gender differences. Committed to the goal of opening this black box, we propose an analytical strategy for qualitative empirical research to unveil these subtle, highly normalized, discursive practices of attributing gender norms to the epistemic subjects, objects and activities in science and engineering, and exemplify it with reference to our own empirical study. By comparing the patterns of distinction with respect to epistemic boundaries and to gender differentiations, it is possible to trace connections between the symbolic gender order and epistemic cultures within t

     
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/57182
    DDC Categories: 300; 301
    Other subjects: (thesoz)Geschlechterforschung; (thesoz)Naturwissenschaft; (thesoz)Ingenieurwissenschaft; (thesoz)Gender; (thesoz)Geschlechtsrolle; (thesoz)Rollenzuschreibung; (thesoz)geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; (thesoz)Männlichkeit; (thesoz)Konstruktion; (thesoz)Distinktion; (thesoz)Neutralität; (thesoz)Objektivität; (thesoz)Wissensproduktion; (thesoz)Methodologie; symbolic gender order; implicit masculinity construction; discursive practices; semi-structured interview; grounded theory methodology; patterns of distinction
    Scope: Online-Ressource
    Notes:

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    begutachtet (peer reviewed)

    In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research ; 17 (2016) 3 ; 21
  2. Rezension: Ursula Offenberger (2016): Geschlecht und Gemütlichkeit - Paarentscheidungen über das beheizte Zuhause
    Author: Breuer, Franz
    Published: 2018

    Abstract: Ursula Offenberger thematisiert in ihrer Monografie die Aushandlung der Installation von Heiztechnologie im familiären Eigenheim als Form der Herstellung von Zuhause und häuslicher Gemütlichkeit im Rahmen der Geschlechterbeziehung. Ihr... more

     

    Abstract: Ursula Offenberger thematisiert in ihrer Monografie die Aushandlung der Installation von Heiztechnologie im familiären Eigenheim als Form der Herstellung von Zuhause und häuslicher Gemütlichkeit im Rahmen der Geschlechterbeziehung. Ihr empirischer Forschungsstil ist an der Grounded-Theory-Methodologie (GTM) sowie der Situationsanalyse ausgerichtet. Es wird mit diesen Mitteln ein dichtes Netz von Handlungs- und Bedeutungsebenen im sozialen Mikro- und Makroradius herausgearbeitet, in dem ein profanes Problem wie das häusliche Heizen verortet ist. In dieser Besprechung werden einige methodologisch-methodische Knackpunkte der Untersuchung kritisch besprochen. Die Autorin findet interessante Lösungen für Darstellungs- und Modellbildungs-Probleme, die für GTM-Studien charakteristisch sind

     
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: German
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/57391
    DDC Categories: 301; 300
    Subjects: Paar; Zuhause; Gemütlichkeit; Entscheidung; Rezension; Eigenheim
    Other subjects: Dar­stellungsprobleme; Geschlechter­forschung; Grounded-Theory-Methodologie; Modellbildung; Nachhaltigkeits­forschung; Situationsanalyse; gender studies; grounded theory methodology; model building; representation; situational analysis; sozialwissen­schaftliche Technikforschung; sustainability research; technology studies
    Scope: Online-Ressource
    Notes:

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    begutachtet (peer reviewed)

    In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research ; 19 (2018) 1 ; 12
  3. Successfully Managing the Literature Review and Write-up Process When Using Grounded Theory Methodology - A Dialogue in Exploration
    Author: Dunne, Ciaran; Ustundag, Buse Gamze
    Published: 2020
    Publisher:  SSOAR - Social Science Open Access Repository, Mannheim

    Abstract: For researchers unaccustomed to using grounded theory methodology (GTM), it can be daunting. To help address this issue, in this article we present a dialogue between a doctoral candidate who is using GTM and an academic who has experience... more

     

    Abstract: For researchers unaccustomed to using grounded theory methodology (GTM), it can be daunting. To help address this issue, in this article we present a dialogue between a doctoral candidate who is using GTM and an academic who has experience working with this methodology. Through dialogue, we tackle several important points relating to the methodology, focusing on two key aspects which often create challenges for researchers new to GTM: 1. how and when to engage with existing literature, and 2. what significant implications which using this methodology has for the overall written structure of a grounded theory study, not simply the presentation of the grounded theory itself. This format, which ends with a reflection on the dialogue, aims to facilitate a clearer understanding of the methodology, clarify problematic issues, and offer practical guidance on how to apply it, thereby shedding light on "the long, rocky walk through the dark forest of the research process using the GT method

     
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/66950
    DDC Categories: 300
    Other subjects: (thesoz)Grounded Theory; (thesoz)Methodologie; (thesoz)qualitative Methode; Literaturnutzung; grounded theory methodology; literature review; qualitative research
    Scope: Online-Ressource
    Notes:

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    begutachtet (peer reviewed)

    In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research ; 21 (2020) 1 ; 18