Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 3 of 3.

  1. Was würdest Du tun?
    Wie uns das Bedingungslose Grundeinkommen verändert - Antworten aus der Praxis
    Author: Bohmeyer, Michael; Cornelsen, Claudia
    Published: 2022
    Publisher:  Ullstein Taschenbuch Verlag, Berlin

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Source: Union catalogues
    Contributor: Werner, Götz W.
    Language: German
    Media type: Book
    Format: Print
    ISBN: 9783548062563; 3548062563
    Other identifier:
    9783548062563
    Other subjects: (Produktform)Paperback / softback; (BISAC Subject Heading)BUS097000; (BISAC Subject Heading)SOC000000: SOCIAL SCIENCE / General; (BISAC Subject Heading)SOC002010: SOCIAL SCIENCE / Anthropology / Cultural; (BISAC Subject Heading)POL007000: POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Ideologies / Democracy; (BISAC Subject Heading)POL035010: POLITICAL SCIENCE / Human Rights; (BISAC Subject Heading)BUS069030: BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Economics / Theory; (BISAC Subject Heading)POL023000: POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Economy; (BISAC Subject Heading)BUS050000: BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Personal Finance / General; (BISAC Subject Heading)SEL039000: SELF-HELP / Green Lifestyle; bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen; alternatives Wirtschaftsmodell; Sozialpolitik; Transferkonzept; negative Einkommensteuer; Bürgergeld; Arbeitswelt; Arbeitswelt von morgen; Spaltung der Gesellschaft; Problemlösung; Ermöglichung; Potentialismus; Potentiale; Vertrauen; Theorie Y; Niedriglohnsektor; Sozialhilfe; Freiberufler; Selbstausbeutung; Arbeitslosigkeit; Digitalisierung; Arbeitsplatzverlust; 4-Stunden-Woche; 4-Stunden Woche; Götz Werner; Hartz 4; Hartz IV; Gesellschaftsutopie; German Angst; gewaltfreier Staat; Existenzberechtigung; Selbstverwirklichung; Gemeinschaftsgefühl; Grundeinkommen bedingungslos; Grundeinkommen Werner; persönliche Finanzen; Selbstversorgung; Bürgerrechte; Wirtschaftspolitik; Grundeinkommen gewinnen; Grundeinkommen Verlosung; Grundeinkommen Lotterie; Grundeinkommen Buch; Grundeinkommen Jahr; Grundeinkommen Argumente; Grundeinkommen Antrag; Grundeinkommen Test; Grundeinkommen Auslosung; Grundeinkommen Befürworter; Grundeinkommen Crowdhörnchen; Grundeinkommen Chancengleichheit; Grundeinkommen Digitalisierung; Grundeinkommen Diskussion; Grundeinkommen Deutschland beantragen; Grundeinkommen Experiment; Grundeinkommen Erfahrungen; Grundeinkommen einführen; Grundeinkommen finanzierbar; Grundeinkommen Idee; Grundeinkommen jetzt; Grundeinkommen ja; Grundeinkommen kontrovers; Grundeinkommen Konzept; Grundeinkommen Literatur; Grundeinkommen mein; Grundeinkommen Meinungen; Grundeinkommen mitmachen; Grundeinkommen nächste Verlosung; Grundeinkommen ohne Bedingungen; Grundeinkommen Politik; Grundeinkommen Studie; Grundeinkommen Test Deutschland; Grundeinkommen Utopie; Bücher über Grundeinkommen; Buch über Grundeinkommen; Debatte über Grundeinkommen; Debatte Grundeinkommen; Grundeinkommen Vorteile; Grundeinkommen Versuch; Grundeinkommen zu gewinnen; spiegel bestseller; Spiegel Bestseller 2019; Arbeit; Arbeitslosengeld; Freiheit; Geschenk; Kindergeld; Selbstfürsorge; Wohngeld; Vertrauensvorschuss; Spiegel-Bestseller; Glück; Spenden; Vererben; Verschenken; Geld vererben; Geld spenden; Geld verschenken; Douglas McGregor; McGregor; X und Y-Theorie; Sozialystem; Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung; Geldgeschenk; Lotteriegewinn; Lotterie; Lotterie spielen; Lotto spielen; Einkommensschere; Sinn von Arbeit und Leistung; Sanktionsfrei; 1000 Euro für jeden; 1000 € für jeden; 1000 Euro für Alle; 1000 € für Alle; Wohlstand für Alle; 1.000 Euro mehr im Monat auch für Managersöhne; Sozialbetrüger; Sozialneid; Demokratieverständnis; Schlaraffenland; Mein Grundeinkommen e.V.; Mein Grundeinkommen; Grundeinkommen; BGE; Angst; Empathie; Existenzangst; Grundeinkommensgefühl; Jobcenter; Unterhalt; (BISAC Subject Heading)BUS097000: BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Workplace Culture; (VLB-WN)2973: Taschenbuch / Sachbücher/Politik, Gesellschaft, Wirtschaft/Gesellschaft
    Scope: 288 Seiten, 18.7 cm x 12 cm
  2. Finanzielle Verluste und sozialpolitische Unterstützung von Haushalten in der Corona-Krise : eine Befragung der deutschen Erwerbsbevölkerung ab 30 Jahren während des zweiten Lockdowns im Dezember 2020 bis Januar 2021
    Author: Aprea, Carmela; Bucher-Koenen, Tabea; Cziriak, Marius; Gilan, Donya
    Published: 2022
    Publisher:  Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim, Mannheim

  3. The impact of carbon taxation and revenue redistribution on poverty and inequality
    Author: Malerba, Daniele; Chen, Xiangjie; Feng, Kuishuang; Hubacek, Klaus; Oswald, Yannick
    Published: 2022
    Publisher:  German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS) gGmbH, Bonn

    The global policy debate on just transitions is concerned with how to achieve a socially just and acceptable transition toward a climate-neutral and climate-resilient global economy. At the core of this debate is the assumption that efforts to combat... more

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)

    Location:
    Fachinformationsverbund Internationale Beziehungen und Länderkunde
    Inter-library loan:
    No inter-library loan

    Location:
    German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), Bibliothek
    Signature:
    OA
    Inter-library loan:
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

    Location:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Signature:
    DSP 396
    Inter-library loan:
    No inter-library loan

     

    The global policy debate on just transitions is concerned with how to achieve a socially just and acceptable transition toward a climate-neutral and climate-resilient global economy. At the core of this debate is the assumption that efforts to combat environmental threats will not succeed unless combined with measures to reduce poverty and inequality. Our research explores the potential of carbon fiscal reforms, combining a carbon tax of levels deemed appropriate to achieve climate targets and the transfer of the revenues raised to vulnerable households. The current energy and cost-of-living crisis shows the importance of protecting the poorest and most vulnerable households from price increases. It also shows the difficulty of achieving short- and long-term policy priorities. Despite the current spikes in energy prices, carbon fiscal reforms can achieve both social and environmental goals through simultaneously decreasing emissions and reducing poverty and inequality. They should act as an effective enabler of just transitions. Carbon fiscal reform can avoid some environmental impacts by incentivising reductions in emissions. Carbon pricing has been increasingly advocated and is now at the centre of policy debates, including the UNFCCC Conference of the Parties (COP) and the recent German presidency of the world's leading industrial nations (G7). But carbon fiscal reforms can also be used to raise revenue from carbon pricing instruments to offset the negative effects of higher prices on poorer households as well as further reaching distributional targets and poverty alleviation. Climate targets are negotiated every year, including at COP, hence it is critical to re-evaluate and improve estimates of the distributional impacts of climate policies such as carbon pricing. Public acceptability of climate policies is key to their implementation, but it depends to a large extent on the perceived fairness of such policies. Recycling revenues from carbon taxes directly back to vulnerable households is likely to gain the approval of a large number of people, especially in low-income countries where the high proportion of the population involved in the informal economy means that lowering income tax does not benefit the poorest and most vulnerable sections of society. But the targeting of these direct transfers needs careful consideration. Here, we assess the impact on poverty and inequality of a global carbon tax and national redistribution of revenues to vulnerable households. We look at different options for such redistribution, including a lump sum payment, the use of current social assistance programmes, and an expansion of social assistance following COVID-19. We find that a carbon tax of US$50/tCO2 without revenue redistribution could increase global extreme poverty, but the redistribution of revenue from such a carbon tax could substantially reduce poverty by between 16% and 27% (110 to 190 million people), and reduce inequality (the average Gini coefficient would decline by between 4% and 8%), depending on the scenario. This shows that the way in which revenue from a carbon tax is redistributed greatly affects its impact, underlining the importance of policy design and targeting mechanisms. The recycling of revenues should also take into account the specific political economy of a country and consider international transfers. These findings provide policy makers with a strong basis for informing discussions, starting off with those at COP27, in which ambitious climate targets and just transition should both remain central goals in the context of the ongoing international energy crisis.

     
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/266567
    Series: IDOS policy brief ; 2022, 11
    Subjects: Umweltpolitik; Umweltschutz; Klimaschutz; Fiskalpolitik; Steuerpolitik; Steuer; Umweltabgabe; Öffentliche Ausgaben; Sozioökonomischer Wandel; Sozialhilfe; Poverty; inequality; climate change; taxation
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 8 Seiten), Illustrationen