Narrow Search
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 4 of 4.

  1. Distracted Subjects
    Madness and Gender in Shakespeare and Early Modern Culture
    Published: [2004]
    Publisher:  Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY ; Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin

    In the first book to provide a feminist analysis of early modern madness, Carol Thomas Neely reveals the mobility and heterogeneity of discourses of "distraction," the most common term for the condition in late-sixteenth- and early... more

    Access:
    Universitätsbibliothek Gießen
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Landesbibliothek und Murhardsche Bibliothek der Stadt Kassel
    No inter-library loan
    Universität Mainz, Zentralbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universität Marburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    No inter-library loan

     

    In the first book to provide a feminist analysis of early modern madness, Carol Thomas Neely reveals the mobility and heterogeneity of discourses of "distraction," the most common term for the condition in late-sixteenth- and early seventeenth-century England. Distracted Subjects shows how changing ideas of madness that circulated through medical, dramatic, and political texts transformed and gendered subjectivities. Supernatural causation is denied, new diagnoses appear, and stage representations proliferate. Drama sometimes leads and sometimes follows other cultural discourses—or forges its own prophetic figures of distraction. The Spanish Tragedy first links madness to masculine tragic self-representation, and Hamlet invents a language to dramatize feminine somatic illness. Innovative women's melancholy is theorized in medical and witchcraft treatises and then elaborated in the extended portrait of the Jailer's Daughter's distraction in The Two Noble Kinsmen. Lovesickness, newly diagnosed in women, demands novel cures, and allows expressions of transgressive sexual desire in treatises and in plays such as As You Like It. The rituals of possession and exorcism, intensely debated off stage, are mocked and exploited on stage in reiterated comic scenes of confinement that madden men to enhance women's power.Neely's final chapter provides a startling challenge to the critically alluring analogy between Bedlam and the early modern stage by documenting that Bethlem hospital offered care, not spectacle, whereas stage Bedlamites served metatheatrical and prophylactic, not mimetic, ends. An epilogue places this particular historical moment within the longer history of madness and shows how our own attitudes toward distraction are haunted by those earlier debates and representations.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9781501729133
    Other identifier:
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource, 1 map, 16 halftones
    Notes:

    Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 19. Feb 2019)

  2. Distracted subjects
    madness and gender in Shakespeare and early modern culture
    Published: 2004
    Publisher:  Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca ; London

    In the first book to provide a feminist analysis of early modern madness, Carol Thomas Neely reveals the mobility and heterogeneity of discourses of "distraction," the most common term for the condition in late-sixteenth- and early... more

    Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus - Senftenberg, Universitätsbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

     

    In the first book to provide a feminist analysis of early modern madness, Carol Thomas Neely reveals the mobility and heterogeneity of discourses of "distraction," the most common term for the condition in late-sixteenth- and early seventeenth-century England. Distracted Subjects shows how changing ideas of madness that circulated through medical, dramatic, and political texts transformed and gendered subjectivities. Supernatural causation is denied, new diagnoses appear, and stage representations proliferate. Drama sometimes leads and sometimes follows other cultural discourses—or forges its own prophetic figures of distraction. The Spanish Tragedy first links madness to masculine tragic self-representation, and Hamlet invents a language to dramatize feminine somatic illness. Innovative women's melancholy is theorized in medical and witchcraft treatises and then elaborated in the extended portrait of the Jailer's Daughter's distraction in The Two Noble Kinsmen. Lovesickness, newly diagnosed in women, demands novel cures, and allows expressions of transgressive sexual desire in treatises and in plays such as As You Like It. The rituals of possession and exorcism, intensely debated off stage, are mocked and exploited on stage in reiterated comic scenes of confinement that madden men to enhance women's power.Neely's final chapter provides a startling challenge to the critically alluring analogy between Bedlam and the early modern stage by documenting that Bethlem hospital offered care, not spectacle, whereas stage Bedlamites served metatheatrical and prophylactic, not mimetic, ends. An epilogue places this particular historical moment within the longer history of madness and shows how our own attitudes toward distraction are haunted by those earlier debates and representations

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9781501729133
    Other identifier:
    RVK Categories: HI 3385
    Edition: 1. print. Cornell paperbacks
    Subjects: Literature and mental illness; Mental illness; Mental illness; Psychoanalysis and literature; Wahnsinn <Motiv>; Englisch; Drama; Geschlechterrolle <Motiv>
    Other subjects: Shakespeare, William (1564-1616)
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (XIII, 244 S.), Illustrationen
  3. Distracted subjects
    madness and gender in Shakespeare and early modern culture
    Published: 2004
    Publisher:  Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca ; London

    In the first book to provide a feminist analysis of early modern madness, Carol Thomas Neely reveals the mobility and heterogeneity of discourses of "distraction," the most common term for the condition in late-sixteenth- and early... more

    Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Amberg-Weiden / Hochschulbibliothek Amberg
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    TH-AB - Technische Hochschule Aschaffenburg, Hochschulbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Technische Hochschule Augsburg
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Bamberg
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Hochschule Coburg, Zentralbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Hochschule Kempten, Hochschulbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Hochschule Landshut, Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, Bibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Passau
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Würzburg
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

     

    In the first book to provide a feminist analysis of early modern madness, Carol Thomas Neely reveals the mobility and heterogeneity of discourses of "distraction," the most common term for the condition in late-sixteenth- and early seventeenth-century England. Distracted Subjects shows how changing ideas of madness that circulated through medical, dramatic, and political texts transformed and gendered subjectivities. Supernatural causation is denied, new diagnoses appear, and stage representations proliferate. Drama sometimes leads and sometimes follows other cultural discourses—or forges its own prophetic figures of distraction. The Spanish Tragedy first links madness to masculine tragic self-representation, and Hamlet invents a language to dramatize feminine somatic illness. Innovative women's melancholy is theorized in medical and witchcraft treatises and then elaborated in the extended portrait of the Jailer's Daughter's distraction in The Two Noble Kinsmen. Lovesickness, newly diagnosed in women, demands novel cures, and allows expressions of transgressive sexual desire in treatises and in plays such as As You Like It. The rituals of possession and exorcism, intensely debated off stage, are mocked and exploited on stage in reiterated comic scenes of confinement that madden men to enhance women's power.Neely's final chapter provides a startling challenge to the critically alluring analogy between Bedlam and the early modern stage by documenting that Bethlem hospital offered care, not spectacle, whereas stage Bedlamites served metatheatrical and prophylactic, not mimetic, ends. An epilogue places this particular historical moment within the longer history of madness and shows how our own attitudes toward distraction are haunted by those earlier debates and representations

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9781501729133
    Other identifier:
    RVK Categories: HI 3385
    Edition: 1. print. Cornell paperbacks
    Subjects: Literature and mental illness; Mental illness; Mental illness; Psychoanalysis and literature; Wahnsinn <Motiv>; Englisch; Drama; Geschlechterrolle <Motiv>
    Other subjects: Shakespeare, William (1564-1616)
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (XIII, 244 S.), Illustrationen
  4. Distracted subjects
    madness and gender in Shakespeare and early modern culture
    Published: 2018; ©2004
    Publisher:  Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    In the first book to provide a feminist analysis of early modern madness, Carol Thomas Neely reveals the mobility and heterogeneity of discourses of "distraction," the most common term for the condition in late-sixteenth- and early... more

    Access:
    Resolving-System (lizenzpflichtig)
    Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen
    No inter-library loan
    Technische Universität Chemnitz, Universitätsbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Sächsische Landesbibliothek - Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Dresden
    No inter-library loan
    Zentrale Hochschulbibliothek Flensburg
    No inter-library loan
    Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Bibliothek 'Georgius Agricola'
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Greifswald
    No inter-library loan
    Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt / Zentrale
    No inter-library loan
    HafenCity Universität Hamburg, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg, Hochschulinformations- und Bibliotheksservice (HIBS), Fachbibliothek Technik, Wirtschaft, Informatik
    No inter-library loan
    Technische Universität Hamburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Bibliothek - Niedersächsische Landesbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Hildesheim
    No inter-library loan
    Thüringer Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Kiel, Zentralbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig
    No inter-library loan
    Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Medien- und Informationszentrum, Universitätsbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Duale Hochschule Baden-Württemberg Mannheim, Bibliothek
    eBook de Gruyter
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschule Merseburg, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschule Mittweida (FH), Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Bibliotheks-und Informationssystem der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (BIS)
    No inter-library loan
    Bibliotheks-und Informationssystem der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (BIS)
    No inter-library loan
    Jade Hochschule Wilhelmshaven/Oldenburg/Elsfleth, Campus Oldenburg, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Jade Hochschule Wilhelmshaven/Oldenburg/Elsfleth, Campus Elsfleth, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Osnabrück
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschulbibliothek Pforzheim, Bereichsbibliothek Technik und Wirtschaft
    eBook de Gruyter
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Stuttgart
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek der Eberhard Karls Universität
    No loan of volumes, only paper copies will be sent
    Jade Hochschule Wilhelmshaven/Oldenburg/Elsfleth, Campus Wilhelmshaven, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschule Zittau / Görlitz, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan

     

    In the first book to provide a feminist analysis of early modern madness, Carol Thomas Neely reveals the mobility and heterogeneity of discourses of "distraction," the most common term for the condition in late-sixteenth- and early seventeenth-century England. Distracted Subjects shows how changing ideas of madness that circulated through medical, dramatic, and political texts transformed and gendered subjectivities. Supernatural causation is denied, new diagnoses appear, and stage representations proliferate. Drama sometimes leads and sometimes follows other cultural discourses—or forges its own prophetic figures of distraction. The Spanish Tragedy first links madness to masculine tragic self-representation, and Hamlet invents a language to dramatize feminine somatic illness. Innovative women's melancholy is theorized in medical and witchcraft treatises and then elaborated in the extended portrait of the Jailer's Daughter's distraction in The Two Noble Kinsmen. Lovesickness, newly diagnosed in women, demands novel cures, and allows expressions of transgressive sexual desire in treatises and in plays such as As You Like It. The rituals of possession and exorcism, intensely debated off stage, are mocked and exploited on stage in reiterated comic scenes of confinement that madden men to enhance women's power.Neely's final chapter provides a startling challenge to the critically alluring analogy between Bedlam and the early modern stage by documenting that Bethlem hospital offered care, not spectacle, whereas stage Bedlamites served metatheatrical and prophylactic, not mimetic, ends. An epilogue places this particular historical moment within the longer history of madness and shows how our own attitudes toward distraction are haunted by those earlier debates and representations.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information