Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 5 of 5.

  1. Experimental investigations of judicial decision-making
    Author: Holste, Lukas; Spamann, Holger
    Published: [2023]
    Publisher:  Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)

    Location:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Inter-library loan:
    No inter-library loan
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Series: Discussion paper / Harvard John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business ; no. 1096 (03/2023)
    Subjects: experiments; judicial decision-making; expertise; effect of law; methodology
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 22 Seiten)
  2. Justice is less blind, and less legalistic, than we thought
    evidence from an experiment with real judges
    Author: Spamann, Holger; Klöhn, Lars
    Published: 09/2016
    Publisher:  Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA

    Location:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Inter-library loan:
    No inter-library loan
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Series: Discussion paper / Harvard John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business ; no. 884
    Subjects: Precedent; judicial decision-making; judicial behavior; judicial bias; judicial psychology; determinants of judicial decisions; international criminal law; experiments in law
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 41 Seiten)
    Notes:

    Published in Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 45, No. 2 (2016)
  3. Judicial decision-making a survey of the experimental evidence
    Author: Engel, Christoph
    Published: August 2022
    Publisher:  Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn

    Judges are human beings. Is their behavior therefore subject to the same effects that psychology and behavioral economics have documented for convenience samples, like university students? Does that fact that they decide on behalf of third parties... more

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)

    Location:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Signature:
    DS 62
    Inter-library loan:
    No inter-library loan

     

    Judges are human beings. Is their behavior therefore subject to the same effects that psychology and behavioral economics have documented for convenience samples, like university students? Does that fact that they decide on behalf of third parties moderate their behavior? In which ways does the need matter to find a solution when the evidence is inconclusive and contested? How do the multiple institutional safeguards resulting from procedural law, and the ways how the parties use it, affect judicial decision-making? Many of these questions have been put to the experimental test. The paper provides a systematic overview of the rich evidence, points out gaps that still exist, and discusses methodological challenges.

     
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 21.11116/0000-000A-E4EF-8
    hdl: 10419/274055
    Series: Discussion papers of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods ; 2022, 6
    Subjects: judicial decision-making; bias; heuristic; attitudinal model; ambiguity; parallel con-straint satisfaction; public perception
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 25 Seiten)
  4. Are there common/civil law differences and precedent effects in judging around the world?
    a lab experiment
    Author: Spamann, Holger; Klöhn, Lars; Jamin, Christophe; Khanna, Vikramaditya S.; Liu, Zhuang; Mamidi, Pavan; Morell, Alexander; Reidel, Ivan
    Published: 2020
    Publisher:  Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)

    Location:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Inter-library loan:
    No inter-library loan
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Series: Discussion paper / Harvard John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business ; no. 1044 (09/2020)
    Subjects: Common/civil law; judicial decision-making; experiment; comparative law; bias; anchoring; precedent; methodology
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 127 Seiten)
  5. Judges in the lab: no precedent effects, no common/civil law differences
    Author: Spamann, Holger; Klöhn, Lars; Jamin, Christophe; Khanna, Vikramaditya S.; Liu, Zhuang; Mamidi, Pavan; Morell, Alexander; Reidel, Ivan
    Published: 2020
    Publisher:  Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)

    Location:
    Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin - Institute for Advanced Study, Bibliothek
    Signature:
    Jahrgang 2019/20 Spa
    Inter-library loan:
    No inter-library loan

    Location:
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    Inter-library loan:
    No inter-library loan
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    Edition: Update
    Series: Discussion paper / Harvard John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business ; no. 1044 update (11/2020)
    Subjects: Common/civil law; judicial decision-making; experiment; comparative law; bias; anchoring; precedent; methodology
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 127 Seiten)