Narrow Search
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 4 of 4.

  1. Reading and not reading "The Faerie Queene"
    Spenser and the making of literary criticism
    Published: [2020]; © 2020
    Publisher:  Princeton University Press, Princeton ; Oxford

    The four-hundred-year story of readers' struggles with a famously unreadable poem—and what they reveal about the history of reading and the future of literary studies"I am now in the country, and reading Spencer's fairy-queen. Pray what is the matter... more

    Access:
    Verlag (lizenzpflichtig)
    Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus - Senftenberg, Universitätsbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Universität Potsdam, Universitätsbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

     

    The four-hundred-year story of readers' struggles with a famously unreadable poem—and what they reveal about the history of reading and the future of literary studies"I am now in the country, and reading Spencer's fairy-queen. Pray what is the matter with me?" The plaint of an anonymous reader in 1712 sounds with endearing frankness a note of consternation that resonates throughout The Faerie Queene's reception history, from its first known reader, Spenser's friend Gabriel Harvey, who urged him to write anything else instead, to Virginia Woolf, who insisted that if one wants to like the poem, "the first essential is, of course, not to read" it. For more than four centuries critics have sought to counter this strain of readerly resistance, but rather than trying to remedy the frustrations and failures of Spenser's readers, Catherine Nicholson cherishes them as a sensitive barometer of shifts in the culture of reading itself.Indeed, tracking the poem's mixed fortunes in the hands of its bored, baffled, outraged, intoxicated, obsessive, and exhausted readers turns out to be an excellent way of rethinking the past and future prospects of literary study. By examining the responses of readers from Queen Elizabeth and the keepers of Renaissance commonplace books to nineteenth-century undergraduates, Victorian children, and modern scholars, this book offers a compelling new interpretation of the poem and an important new perspective on what it means to read, or not to read, a work of literature

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Volltext (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
  2. Reading and not reading "The Faerie Queene"
    Spenser and the making of literary criticism
    Published: [2020]; © 2020
    Publisher:  Princeton University Press, Princeton ; Oxford

    The four-hundred-year story of readers' struggles with a famously unreadable poem—and what they reveal about the history of reading and the future of literary studies"I am now in the country, and reading Spencer's fairy-queen. Pray what is the matter... more

    Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Amberg-Weiden / Hochschulbibliothek Amberg
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    TH-AB - Technische Hochschule Aschaffenburg, Hochschulbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Technische Hochschule Augsburg
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Bamberg
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Hochschule Coburg, Zentralbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Hochschule Kempten, Hochschulbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Hochschule Landshut, Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, Bibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Passau
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

     

    The four-hundred-year story of readers' struggles with a famously unreadable poem—and what they reveal about the history of reading and the future of literary studies"I am now in the country, and reading Spencer's fairy-queen. Pray what is the matter with me?" The plaint of an anonymous reader in 1712 sounds with endearing frankness a note of consternation that resonates throughout The Faerie Queene's reception history, from its first known reader, Spenser's friend Gabriel Harvey, who urged him to write anything else instead, to Virginia Woolf, who insisted that if one wants to like the poem, "the first essential is, of course, not to read" it. For more than four centuries critics have sought to counter this strain of readerly resistance, but rather than trying to remedy the frustrations and failures of Spenser's readers, Catherine Nicholson cherishes them as a sensitive barometer of shifts in the culture of reading itself.Indeed, tracking the poem's mixed fortunes in the hands of its bored, baffled, outraged, intoxicated, obsessive, and exhausted readers turns out to be an excellent way of rethinking the past and future prospects of literary study. By examining the responses of readers from Queen Elizabeth and the keepers of Renaissance commonplace books to nineteenth-century undergraduates, Victorian children, and modern scholars, this book offers a compelling new interpretation of the poem and an important new perspective on what it means to read, or not to read, a work of literature

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Volltext (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
  3. Shaping the Canons of Ancient Greek Historiography
    Imitation, Classicism, and Literary Criticism
    Published: [2018]; ©2018
    Publisher:  De Gruyter, Berlin ; Boston

    The main focus of this book is the ancient formation and development of the canons of Greek historiography. It takes a fresh look on the modern debate on canonical literature and deals with Greek historiographical traditions in the works of ancient... more

    Access:
    Hochschulbibliothek der Fachhochschule Aachen
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek der RWTH Aachen
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschule Bielefeld – University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld
    No inter-library loan
    Evangelische Hochschule Rheinland-Westfalen-Lippe, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschule Bochum, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschule für Gesundheit, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Technische Hochschule Georg Agricola, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Fachhochschule Dortmund, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Dortmund
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschulbibliothek der Hochschule Düsseldorf
    No inter-library loan
    Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Duisburg-Essen
    No inter-library loan
    Westfälische Hochschule Gelsenkirchen Bocholt Recklinghausen, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Fachhochschule Südwestfalen, Fachbibliothek Hagen, Zentralbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek der Fernuniversität
    No inter-library loan
    Katholische Hochschule Nordrhein-Westfalen (katho), Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Kunsthochschule für Medien, Bibliothek / Mediathek
    No inter-library loan
    Rheinische Hochschule Köln gGmbH, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Technische Hochschule Köln, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln, Hauptabteilung
    No inter-library loan
    Zentralbibliothek der Sportwissenschaften der Deutschen Sporthochschule Köln
    No inter-library loan
    Technische Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Service Kommunikation Information Medien
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschule Niederrhein, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschule Ruhr West, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    FH Münster, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Münster, Zentralbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Paderborn
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Siegen
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Trier
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal
    No inter-library loan

     

    The main focus of this book is the ancient formation and development of the canons of Greek historiography. It takes a fresh look on the modern debate on canonical literature and deals with Greek historiographical traditions in the works of ancient rhetors and literary critics. Writings on historiography by Cicero, Quintilian, and Dionysius of Halicarnassus are chiefly taken into account to explore the canons of Greek historians in Hellenistic and Roman Imperial Ages. Essential in canon-formation was the concept of classicism which took shape in the Age of Augustus, but whose earlier developments can be traced back to Isocrates, a model rhetor according to Dionysius at the end of the 1st century BC. The analysis explores also late-antique authors of school treatises and progymnasmata, a field where historiography had a pedagogical function. Previous studies on canonical literature have rarely considered historiography. This book examines not only the works of ancient historians and their legacy, but also the relationship between historiography, literary criticism, and the rhetorical tradition

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Dissertation
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9783110476279
    Other identifier:
    Series: Beiträge zur Altertumskunde ; 359
    Subjects: Historians / Greece; Ancient historiography; Geschichtsschreibung; Klassizismus; Rhetorik; canonical literature; classicism; literarischer Kanon; rhetorical treatises; LITERARY CRITICISM / Ancient & Classical
    Scope: 1 online resource (306 p.)
    Notes:

    Dissertation

  4. Reading and Not Reading The Faerie Queene
    Spenser and the Making of Literary Criticism
    Published: [2020]; ©2020
    Publisher:  Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    The four-hundred-year story of readers' struggles with a famously unreadable poem—and what they reveal about the history of reading and the future of literary studies"I am now in the country, and reading Spencer's fairy-queen. Pray what is the matter... more

    Access:
    Hochschulbibliothek der Fachhochschule Aachen
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek der RWTH Aachen
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschule Bielefeld – University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld
    No inter-library loan
    Evangelische Hochschule Rheinland-Westfalen-Lippe, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschule Bochum, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschule für Gesundheit, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Technische Hochschule Georg Agricola, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Fachhochschule Dortmund, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Dortmund
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschulbibliothek der Hochschule Düsseldorf
    No inter-library loan
    Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Duisburg-Essen
    No inter-library loan
    Westfälische Hochschule Gelsenkirchen Bocholt Recklinghausen, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Fachhochschule Südwestfalen, Fachbibliothek Hagen, Zentralbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek der Fernuniversität
    No inter-library loan
    Katholische Hochschule Nordrhein-Westfalen (katho), Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Kunsthochschule für Medien, Bibliothek / Mediathek
    No inter-library loan
    Rheinische Hochschule Köln gGmbH, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Technische Hochschule Köln, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln, Hauptabteilung
    No inter-library loan
    Zentralbibliothek der Sportwissenschaften der Deutschen Sporthochschule Köln
    No inter-library loan
    Technische Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Service Kommunikation Information Medien
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschule Niederrhein, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschule Ruhr West, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    FH Münster, Hochschulbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Münster, Zentralbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Paderborn
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Siegen
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Trier
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal
    No inter-library loan

     

    The four-hundred-year story of readers' struggles with a famously unreadable poem—and what they reveal about the history of reading and the future of literary studies"I am now in the country, and reading Spencer's fairy-queen. Pray what is the matter with me?" The plaint of an anonymous reader in 1712 sounds with endearing frankness a note of consternation that resonates throughout The Faerie Queene's reception history, from its first known reader, Spenser's friend Gabriel Harvey, who urged him to write anything else instead, to Virginia Woolf, who insisted that if one wants to like the poem, "the first essential is, of course, not to read" it. For more than four centuries critics have sought to counter this strain of readerly resistance, but rather than trying to remedy the frustrations and failures of Spenser's readers, Catherine Nicholson cherishes them as a sensitive barometer of shifts in the culture of reading itself.Indeed, tracking the poem's mixed fortunes in the hands of its bored, baffled, outraged, intoxicated, obsessive, and exhausted readers turns out to be an excellent way of rethinking the past and future prospects of literary study. By examining the responses of readers from Queen Elizabeth and the keepers of Renaissance commonplace books to nineteenth-century undergraduates, Victorian children, and modern scholars, this book offers a compelling new interpretation of the poem and an important new perspective on what it means to read, or not to read, a work of literature

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information