Narrow Search
Search narrowed by
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 5 of 5.

  1. Pushkin’s Monument and Allusion
    Poem, Statue, Performance
    Published: [2019]; © 2019
    Publisher:  University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    In August of 1836 Alexander Pushkin wrote a poem now popularly known simply as "Monument." He died a few months later in January of 1837. In the decades following his death, the poem "Monument" was transformed into a statue in central Moscow: the... more

    Access:
    Resolving-System (lizenzpflichtig)
    Verlag (lizenzpflichtig)
    Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus - Senftenberg, Universitätsbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Universität Potsdam, Universitätsbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

     

    In August of 1836 Alexander Pushkin wrote a poem now popularly known simply as "Monument." He died a few months later in January of 1837. In the decades following his death, the poem "Monument" was transformed into a statue in central Moscow: the Pushkin Monument. At its dedication in 1880, the interaction between the verbal text and the visual monument established a creative dynamic that subsequent generations of artists and thinkers amplified through the use of allusion, the aesthetic device by which writers reference select elements of cultural history to enrich the meaning of their new creation and invite their reader into the shared experience of a tradition. The history of the Pushkin Monument reveals how allusive practice becomes more complex over time. By the twentieth century, both writers and readers negotiated increasingly complex allusions not only to Pushkin’s poem, but to its statuesque form in Moscow and the many performances that took place around it. As the population of newly literate Russians grew throughout the twentieth century, images of the future poet and the naive reader became crucial signifiers of the most meaningful allusions to the Pushkin Monument. Because of this, the story of Pushkin’s Monument is also the story of cultural memory and the aesthetic problems that accompany a cultural history that grows ever longer as it moves into the future

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9781487532239
    Other identifier:
    Subjects: Bulgakov; Pushkin; Russia; Russian sculpture; allusion; cultural history; cultural memory; history of reading; lifelike statue; monuments; LITERARY CRITICISM / European / Eastern (see also Russian & Former Soviet Union); Lyrik; Denkmal; Anspielung
    Other subjects: Puškin, Aleksandr Sergeevič (1799-1837)
    Scope: 1 online resource
    Notes:

    Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 04. Sep 2019)

  2. Pushkin’s Monument and Allusion
    Poem, Statue, Performance
    Published: [2019]; © 2019
    Publisher:  University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    In August of 1836 Alexander Pushkin wrote a poem now popularly known simply as "Monument." He died a few months later in January of 1837. In the decades following his death, the poem "Monument" was transformed into a statue in central Moscow: the... more

    Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Amberg-Weiden / Hochschulbibliothek Amberg
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    TH-AB - Technische Hochschule Aschaffenburg, Hochschulbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Technische Hochschule Augsburg
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Bamberg
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Hochschule Coburg, Zentralbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Hochschule Kempten, Hochschulbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Hochschule Landshut, Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, Bibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Passau
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Regensburg
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

     

    In August of 1836 Alexander Pushkin wrote a poem now popularly known simply as "Monument." He died a few months later in January of 1837. In the decades following his death, the poem "Monument" was transformed into a statue in central Moscow: the Pushkin Monument. At its dedication in 1880, the interaction between the verbal text and the visual monument established a creative dynamic that subsequent generations of artists and thinkers amplified through the use of allusion, the aesthetic device by which writers reference select elements of cultural history to enrich the meaning of their new creation and invite their reader into the shared experience of a tradition. The history of the Pushkin Monument reveals how allusive practice becomes more complex over time. By the twentieth century, both writers and readers negotiated increasingly complex allusions not only to Pushkin’s poem, but to its statuesque form in Moscow and the many performances that took place around it. As the population of newly literate Russians grew throughout the twentieth century, images of the future poet and the naive reader became crucial signifiers of the most meaningful allusions to the Pushkin Monument. Because of this, the story of Pushkin’s Monument is also the story of cultural memory and the aesthetic problems that accompany a cultural history that grows ever longer as it moves into the future

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
  3. Zechariah's Horse Visions and Angelic Intermediaries
    Translation, Allusion, and Transmission in Early Judaism
    Published: [2017]

    In this article, I examine the interplay of transmission and exegesis in Zechariah's textual history, analyzing the strategies that early interpreters employed to create coherence in a difficult text. I use Zechariah's horse visions as examples,... more

    Index theologicus der Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
    No inter-library loan
    FTHNT097714/79/ANG
    No loan of volumes, only paper copies will be sent

     

    In this article, I examine the interplay of transmission and exegesis in Zechariah's textual history, analyzing the strategies that early interpreters employed to create coherence in a difficult text. I use Zechariah's horse visions as examples, exploring their presentation in the early versions and the Book of Revelation. The following examination explores the form of Zechariah used by these ancient interpreters and the habits of reading that are implied in their presentation of reused material. The evidence suggests that, by the late Second Temple period, the majority of readers conceptualized Zech 1:8 and 6:1-5 as coreferential visions and that this linking was representative of a larger strategy of coherence. This strategy is also part of a wider tradition of correlating Zechariah's horses with other heavenly figures in the Hebrew Bible, a tradition that is most prevalent in Targum Jonathan.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Article (journal)
    Format: Print
    Parent title: Enthalten in: The catholic biblical quarterly; Washington, DC : Catholic University of America Press, 1939; 79(2017), 2, Seite 222-239

    Subjects: Pferd; Tiere; Schutzengel; Apokalyptik; Übersetzung; allusion; ALLUSIONS; angel; apocalypse; BIBLE; BIBLE; BIBLE. Revelation; BIBLE. Zechariah; coherence; JUDAISM; Septuagint; Targum Jonathan; translation; Zechariah
    Other subjects: Sacharja Prophet
  4. Memory as overt allusion trigger in ancient literature
    Published: 2022

    This paper begins with a brief definition of allusion. The majority of the paper investigates the ways that memory language was used by ancient authors (Jewish, Greek, and Latin) as a literary technique to signal overt intertextual and intratextual... more

    Index theologicus der Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
    No inter-library loan
    No inter-library loan

     

    This paper begins with a brief definition of allusion. The majority of the paper investigates the ways that memory language was used by ancient authors (Jewish, Greek, and Latin) as a literary technique to signal overt intertextual and intratextual allusions. I argue that this is a recognized, intentional, and cross-cultural phenomenon with varied practices and that scholars need to consider this in future studies of intertextuality.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (kostenfrei)
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Article (journal)
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    Parent title: Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the pseudepigrapha; London : Sage, 1987; 32(2022), 2, Seite 110-126; Online-Ressource

    Subjects: new testament; memory; Jewish; intertextuality; Graeco-Roman; allusion
  5. Intertextuality in New Testament Scholarship
    Significance, Criteria, and the Art of Intertextual Reading
    Published: [2015]

    ‘Intertextuality’ is currently a hot topic among biblical interpreters. However, a great deal of debate regarding the locus, purpose, and meaning-effect of an intertextual event, the criteria used to discern the presence of intertexts (if in fact... more

    Index theologicus der Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
    No inter-library loan
    No inter-library loan

     

    ‘Intertextuality’ is currently a hot topic among biblical interpreters. However, a great deal of debate regarding the locus, purpose, and meaning-effect of an intertextual event, the criteria used to discern the presence of intertexts (if in fact there are any), and the theological value of intertextuality in Scripture still exists. This article surveys these interpretive questions and discusses how the foremost contributors to the conversation have aimed at resolving these hermeneutical tensions. In this article, I examine and compare the hermeneutical methodologies of Richard Hays, Michael Thompson, Dale Allison, Greg Beale, Christopher Beetham, Leroy Huizenga, and Peter Leithart with respect to intertextuality. My aim is to identify the strengths of each contributor’s hermeneutical method, while clarifying where these scholars share similar hermeneutical convictions, as well as where they part ways with one another’s convictions about the practice of intertextual reading.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Article (journal)
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    Parent title: Enthalten in: Currents in biblical research; London [u.a.] : Sage, 2002; 14(2015), 1, Seite 8-23; Online-Ressource

    Subjects: allusion; BIBLE; BIBLE. New Testament; Christopher Beetham; Dale Allison; echo; Greg Beale; Hermeneutics; inner-biblical interpretation; Intertextuality; Leroy Huizenga; Michael Thompson; New Testament use of the Old Testament; Peter Leithart; Richard Hays