Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 6 of 6.

  1. Gaming the Metrics
    Misconduct and Manipulation in Academic Research
    Contributor: Biagioli, Mario (Herausgeber); Lippman, Alexandra (Herausgeber)
    Published: 2020
    Publisher:  The MIT Press, Cambridge ; OAPEN FOUNDATION, The Hague

    How the increasing reliance on metrics to evaluate scholarly publications has produced new forms of academic fraud and misconduct. The traditional academic imperative to “publish or perish” is increasingly coupled with the newer necessity of “impact... more

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Bibliothek der Hochschule Darmstadt, Zentralbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    TU Darmstadt, Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek - Stadtmitte
    No inter-library loan
    Bibliothek der Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek J. C. Senckenberg, Zentralbibliothek (ZB)
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschul- und Landesbibliothek Fulda, Standort Heinrich-von-Bibra-Platz
    No inter-library loan
    Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen, Hochschulbibliothek Gießen
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Gießen
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Landesbibliothek und Murhardsche Bibliothek der Stadt Kassel
    No inter-library loan
    Universität Mainz, Zentralbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universität Marburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    No inter-library loan

     

    How the increasing reliance on metrics to evaluate scholarly publications has produced new forms of academic fraud and misconduct. The traditional academic imperative to “publish or perish” is increasingly coupled with the newer necessity of “impact or perish”—the requirement that a publication have “impact,” as measured by a variety of metrics, including citations, views, and downloads. Gaming the Metrics examines how the increasing reliance on metrics to evaluate scholarly publications has produced radically new forms of academic fraud and misconduct. The contributors show that the metrics-based “audit culture” has changed the ecology of research, fostering the gaming and manipulation of quantitative indicators, which lead to the invention of such novel forms of misconduct as citation rings and variously rigged peer reviews. The chapters, written by both scholars and those in the trenches of academic publication, provide a map of academic fraud and misconduct today. They consider such topics as the shortcomings of metrics, the gaming of impact factors, the emergence of so-called predatory journals, the “salami slicing” of scientific findings, the rigging of global university rankings, and the creation of new watchdogs and forensic practices.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
  2. Collaborative scholarly communities and access in the study of material and visual cultures of religion
    Published: [2018]

    The Center for the Study of Material and Visual Cultures of Religion at Yale University (MAVCOR) does not simply, or even most fundamentally, shape a physical center at Yale University. Although MAVCOR organizes events at Yale and coordinates project... more

    Index theologicus der Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
    No inter-library loan

     

    The Center for the Study of Material and Visual Cultures of Religion at Yale University (MAVCOR) does not simply, or even most fundamentally, shape a physical center at Yale University. Although MAVCOR organizes events at Yale and coordinates project cycles involving Yale affiliates as well as scholars from other universities in the United States and around the world, much of MAVCOR's activity is conducted online. MAVCOR publishes a born-digital, open-access double-blind peer-reviewed journal, MAVCOR Journal. It also features a born-digital exhibition space, the Material Objects Archive. In at least two ways, MAVCOR is deliberately interstitial, invested in the connective spaces between both disciplines and technologies. First, the Center emerged from a desire to promote interdisciplinary conversation among scholars of religion, art history, anthropology, and others engaged with our subjects of inquiry. We have aimed to accomplish this goal by shaping a forum for conversation and an archive for mutual use. Second, MAVCOR engages the need to form a space for peer-reviewed content online in a manner that emphasizes the mutually beneficial relationship of print and digital modes of inquiry. In this work, MAVCOR's overarching commitment is to promote innovative, substantively researched, thoughtfully constructed scholarship, with robust interdisciplinarity as a fundamental element of form and content.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Article (journal)
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    Parent title: Enthalten in: Religion; London [u.a.] : Routledge, 1971; 48(2018), 2, Seite 262-275; Online-Ressource

    Subjects: born digital; Collaborative; digital humanities; material religion
  3. Nobel and novice: author prominence affects peer review
    Published: 2022
    Publisher:  University of Graz, School of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, [Graz]

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    VS 553
    No inter-library loan
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Series: Working paper / School of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Graz ; 2022, 01 (August 16, 2022)
    Subjects: peer review; scientific method; double-anonymized; status bias
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 119 Seiten), Illustrationen
  4. The book proposal book
    a guide for scholarly authors
    Published: [2021]
    Publisher:  Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    "The Book Proposal Book: A Guide for Scholarly Authors is not just a compendium of abstract advice; it's a structured program-complete with worksheets and concrete tasks-that takes readers through each step of researching and writing a proposal that... more

    Access:
    Verlag (lizenzpflichtig)
    Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt / Zentrale
    No inter-library loan

     

    "The Book Proposal Book: A Guide for Scholarly Authors is not just a compendium of abstract advice; it's a structured program-complete with worksheets and concrete tasks-that takes readers through each step of researching and writing a proposal that will sell their book to an editor at a scholarly press. The handbook is premised on the fact that an effective proposal doesn't merely describe a book project-it makes an active case that the manuscript should exist in published form because it has the potential to reach and appeal to actual readers. The Book Proposal Book works though the implications of this premise, showing authors how a focus on audience and usability must inform every element of their pitch. Readers of this handbook will learn how to both write a complete book proposal and confidently navigate the scholarly publishing process from pitch to contract to publication. Moreover, they will gain invaluable insight into their own research and the message they want to share with the world"--

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 0691216622; 9780691216621
    Series: Skills for scholars
    Subjects: Book proposals; Scholarly publishing; Synopsis (Édition) - Guides, manuels, etc; Édition savante - Guides, manuels, etc; EDUCATION / Reference; Book proposals; Scholarly publishing; Handbooks and manuals
    Other subjects: advice; audience; contract; editing; get published; getting published; guidebook; handbook; how to get published; how to publish a book; instruction; manual; manuscript; market; marketing; monograph; peer review; permissions; pitch letter; pitch; plan; production; project description; promotion; proofs; prospectus; publicity; readers; readership; reference; revision; submission; thesis; writer; writing
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (x, 197 pages)
    Notes:

    Includes bibliographical references and index

    Know the Process: Your Readers and the Importance of Fit -- Write for Publication: What Presses Value in Your Scholarly Book Project -- Find Your Place: Competing and Comparable Works -- Identify Your Audiences and Market: Who Is Your Book Really For? -- Showcase Your Core Thesis: Strong Arguments Make Strong Books -- Give an Overview: A Template for Project Descriptions -- Expose the Structure: Effective Chapter Summaries -- Invite Readers In: Book and Chapter Titles -- Put Yourself on the Page: Style and Voice -- Really Put Yourself On the Page: Your Author Biography and CV -- Don't Forget the Details: The Remaining Elements of a Complete Proposal Package -- Make the Connection: When and How to Reach Out to Publishers -- Keep Your Cool: Navigating Reader Reports, Contracts, and Other Decision Points -- See It Through: Permissions, Proofs, and Promotion -- Conclusion: Maintaining Perspective -- Comprehensive Checklist -- Assessing Your Proposal Materials -- Sample Documents -- Suggestions for Further Reading -- Bibliography -- Time-Tested Tips and Frequently Asked Questions by Chapter -- Index.

  5. Tactical refereeing and signaling by publishing
    Published: July 2022
    Publisher:  Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom

    A peer review is used ubiquitously in hiring, promotional, and evaluation decisions, within academia and beyond. It is usually conducted to allocate limited resources, such as the budget of a funder or the pages of a journal. With limited capacity, a... more

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DS 159
    No inter-library loan

     

    A peer review is used ubiquitously in hiring, promotional, and evaluation decisions, within academia and beyond. It is usually conducted to allocate limited resources, such as the budget of a funder or the pages of a journal. With limited capacity, a peer review may lead to negatively biased evaluations precisely because approving a peer's worthy project lowers the chance that a referee's own project will be approved. I show that limited capacity is inconsistent with a hypothesis that the decision-maker's policy is to stimulate efforts, and I discuss possible decision-maker motivations that could lead to a limited capacity policy.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/284157
    Series: Cardiff economics working papers ; no. E2022, 14
    Subjects: refereeing; peer review
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 20 Seiten), Illustrationen
  6. What is the benefit from publishing a working paper in a journal in terms of citations?
    evidence from economics
    Published: March 2021
    Publisher:  CESifo, Center for Economic Studies & Ifo Institute, Munich, Germany

    Many papers in economics that are published in peer reviewed journals are initially released in widely circulated working paper series. This raises the question about the benefit of publishing in a peer-reviewed journal in terms of citations.... more

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DS 63
    No inter-library loan

     

    Many papers in economics that are published in peer reviewed journals are initially released in widely circulated working paper series. This raises the question about the benefit of publishing in a peer-reviewed journal in terms of citations. Specifically, we address the question: To what extent does the stamp of approval obtained by publishing in a peer-reviewed journal lead to more subsequent citations for papers that are already available in working paper series? Our data set comprises about 28.000 working papers from four major working paper series in economics. Using panel data methods, we show that the publication in a peer reviewed journal results in around twice the number of yearly citations relative to working papers that never get published in a journal. Our results hold in several robustness checks.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/235295
    Series: CESifo working paper ; no. 8925 (2021)
    Subjects: peer review; citations; RePEc; working paper; preprint
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 22 Seiten), Illustrationen