Narrow Search
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 1 of 1.

  1. Successfully Managing the Literature Review and Write-up Process When Using Grounded Theory Methodology - A Dialogue in Exploration
    Published: 2020
    Publisher:  SSOAR - Social Science Open Access Repository, Mannheim

    Abstract: For researchers unaccustomed to using grounded theory methodology (GTM), it can be daunting. To help address this issue, in this article we present a dialogue between a doctoral candidate who is using GTM and an academic who has experience... more

     

    Abstract: For researchers unaccustomed to using grounded theory methodology (GTM), it can be daunting. To help address this issue, in this article we present a dialogue between a doctoral candidate who is using GTM and an academic who has experience working with this methodology. Through dialogue, we tackle several important points relating to the methodology, focusing on two key aspects which often create challenges for researchers new to GTM: 1. how and when to engage with existing literature, and 2. what significant implications which using this methodology has for the overall written structure of a grounded theory study, not simply the presentation of the grounded theory itself. This format, which ends with a reflection on the dialogue, aims to facilitate a clearer understanding of the methodology, clarify problematic issues, and offer practical guidance on how to apply it, thereby shedding light on "the long, rocky walk through the dark forest of the research process using the GT method

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/66950
    DDC Categories: 300
    Other subjects: (thesoz)Grounded Theory; (thesoz)Methodologie; (thesoz)qualitative Methode; Literaturnutzung; grounded theory methodology; literature review; qualitative research
    Scope: Online-Ressource
    Notes:

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    begutachtet (peer reviewed)

    In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research ; 21 (2020) 1 ; 18