Narrow Search
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 3 of 3.

  1. Regional Data
    Published: 2009

    Abstract: Spatiality is an increasingly important dimension in the social sciences, as a new wave of recent publications shows. Intra-national comparisons have proved to be as fruitful as the better known inter-national analysis. Regional... more

     

    Abstract: Spatiality is an increasingly important dimension in the social sciences, as a new wave of recent publications shows. Intra-national comparisons have proved to be as fruitful as the better known inter-national analysis. Regional characteristics are found to have considerable influence on individual behaviour. This movement was fostered by methodological advances, e.g. in multi-level techniques. On the data side spatial analysis is supported by a good basic infrastructure in official and semiofficial information, often provided in the way of easily usable DVDs. In addition, both scientific researchers and commercial marketing firms collect valuable information, partly on a very detailed local level of only a handful of households.However, there is ample room for improvement. Huge existing datasets (e.g. PISA E) are not open for spatial oriented scientific purposes; in many cases regional information is not sufficiently available (e.g. on criminal behaviour); systematic over-sampling

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/41795
    DDC Categories: 300; 710
    Series: RatSWD Working Paper Series ; Bd. 99
    Subjects: Statistische Datenbank; Räumliche Statistik
    Other subjects: (stw)Statistische Daten; (stw)Räumliche Statistik; (thesoz)Daten; (thesoz)regionaler Vergleich; (thesoz)regionale Identität; (thesoz)Verhalten; (thesoz)Gemeinwesen; (thesoz)Regressionsanalyse; (thesoz)Bundesrepublik Deutschland; (thesoz)Datenzugang; Arbeitspapier; Graue Literatur
    Scope: Online-Ressource, 10 S.
    Notes:

    Veröffentlichungsversion

  2. Community, Commons, Common Sense
    Published: 2022
    Publisher:  SSOAR, GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften e.V., Mannheim

    Abstract: As De Angelis, Federici, and others have noted, there are "no commons without community". The concept of community, however (as, among others, Jean‐Luc Nancy and Roberto Esposito have shown), has a dark history continuing up until today,... more

     

    Abstract: As De Angelis, Federici, and others have noted, there are "no commons without community". The concept of community, however (as, among others, Jean‐Luc Nancy and Roberto Esposito have shown), has a dark history continuing up until today, when extreme right‐wing or even downright fascist appropriations of the concept have understood it as a static and identitarian unity bound to a specific territory or ethnicity. While commons‐scholars try to circumvent this legacy by emphasizing the commons as a "praxis" (Dardot and Laval) or "organizational principle" (De Angelis), they thereby tend to neglect the important cultural and symbolic connotations of the concept of community (which, in part, seem to make right‐wing movements appealing for certain segments of the population). In my article, I want to raise the following question: Do we need a sense of community for a politics of the commons, and, if so, what concept of community should it be? To answer this question, I will refer back to

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    DDC Categories: 320; 100
    Other subjects: (thesoz)Kant, I.; (thesoz)Gemeinschaft; (thesoz)Gemeinwesen; (thesoz)politische Theorie; (thesoz)politische Philosophie; (thesoz)Philosophie; Kant; Rancière; common sense; commons; community; imagination
    Scope: Online-Ressource
    Notes:

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    begutachtet (peer reviewed)

    In: Social Inclusion ; 10 (2022) 1 ; 152-160

  3. Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City
    Published: 2022
    Publisher:  SSOAR, GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften e.V., Mannheim

    Abstract: In Paraisópolis, a slum in São Paulo (Brazil) housing over 100.000 inhabitants, the Covid crisis seemed to have less of a death toll (0,0217%) than in other areas of the city (an average of 0,0652% as of May 2020); or at least it did at... more

     

    Abstract: In Paraisópolis, a slum in São Paulo (Brazil) housing over 100.000 inhabitants, the Covid crisis seemed to have less of a death toll (0,0217%) than in other areas of the city (an average of 0,0652% as of May 2020); or at least it did at first. The sense of community in the area is strong, leading to many community initiatives and organisations to rise to the challenge of combating the pandemic with little help from the authorities. The community's initial efficient response to the Covid crisis relied heavily on self‐reliance and self‐organization to mobilise common resources. Despite their later failure in containing the virus, the community's response to the pandemic is exemplary of a well‐known phenomenon: how communities are able to mobilise the commons to create general welfare. The commons concept is used in this contribution to help us better understand slum governance and the power and limitations of community reliance. At the same time, we aim to refine our understanding of

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    DDC Categories: 301
    Other subjects: (thesoz)Gemeinschaft; (thesoz)Gemeinwesen; (thesoz)Epidemie; (thesoz)Abhängigkeit; (thesoz)Slum; (thesoz)Selbstorganisation; Covid‐19 responses; commons and commoning; community reliance; grassroots and the state; informal settlements
    Scope: Online-Ressource
    Notes:

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    begutachtet (peer reviewed)

    In: Social Inclusion ; 10 (2022) 1 ; 91-102