Narrow Search
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 2 of 2.

  1. Ticket-splitting and strategic voting under mixed electoral rules: evidence from Germany
    Published: 2007

    Abstract: "There is more to strategic voting than simply avoiding wasting one’s vote if one is liberated from the corset of studying voting behavior in plurality systems. Mixed electoral systems provide different voters with diverse incentives to... more

     

    Abstract: "There is more to strategic voting than simply avoiding wasting one’s vote if one is liberated from the corset of studying voting behavior in plurality systems. Mixed electoral systems provide different voters with diverse incentives to cast a strategic vote.They not only determine the degree of strategic voting, but also the kind of strategies voters employ. Strategic voters employ either a wasted-vote or a coalition insurance strategy, but do not automatically cast their vote for large parties as the current literature suggest. This has important implications for the consolidation of party systems. Moreover, even when facing the same institutional incentives, voters vary in their proclivity to vote strategically." (author's abstract)

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/25788
    DDC Categories: 320
    Subjects: Wahlverhalten; Strategie; Wahlsystem
    Other subjects: (stw)Wahlverhalten; (stw)Strategie; (stw)Wahlsystem; (stw)Deutschland; (thesoz)Bundesrepublik Deutschland; (thesoz)Wahlsystem; (thesoz)Entscheidungsprozess; (thesoz)Wahlverhalten; (thesoz)Wähler; (thesoz)Strategie; (thesoz)Mehrheitswahl; (thesoz)Verhältniswahl; (thesoz)Koalition; Arbeitspapier; Graue Literatur
    Scope: Online-Ressource
    Notes:

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    In: European Journal of Political Research ; 46 (2007) 1 ; 1–23

  2. De la concertation à la contestation: quand la peur de la rhétorique envenime les controverses sociotechniques
    Published: 2017

    Abstract: Over the last few years, the organization of public debates in situations of socio-technical or socio-scientific controversy has increased considerably. This should lead to a certain form of social peace due to the fact that each of the... more

     

    Abstract: Over the last few years, the organization of public debates in situations of socio-technical or socio-scientific controversy has increased considerably. This should lead to a certain form of social peace due to the fact that each of the stakeholders - including citizens associations - are able to express their ideas and make their voices heard. In such conditions, how can it be that these debates, instead of easing conflicts, are more likely to radicalize the positions of the various parties involved, and to give the groups opposing the projects the feeling of being exploited? Part of the answer lies in the numerous systems aiming at moderating discussions, which may have been set up by the debates organizers not so much in order to prevent participants from going off the rails, but rather to avoid the development of convincing arguments. Some fear of rhetoric would then be at work. The analysis of debates and consultations, institutionally organized as part of controversial coal-b

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: French
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/55400
    DDC Categories: 320; 301
    Other subjects: (thesoz)Diskurs; (thesoz)Rhetorik; (thesoz)öffentliche Kommunikation; (thesoz)politische Partizipation; (thesoz)Entscheidungsprozess; (thesoz)deliberative Demokratie; controversy; symmetry
    Scope: Online-Ressource
    Notes:

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    begutachtet (peer reviewed)

    In: ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies ; 10 (2017) 1 ; 197-214