Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Narrow Search
Search narrowed by
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 3 of 3.

  1. C. S. Lewis's Christian Apologetics
    Pro and Con
    Published: 2015
    Publisher:  Brill Rodopi, Leiden

    In C. S. Lewis's Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con, ten articulate defenders and critics of Lewis's apologetics square off and debate the merits of Lewis's central arguments for Christian belief more

    Access:

    Location:
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Unter den Linden
    Inter-library loan:
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

    Location:
    Universität Potsdam, Universitätsbibliothek
    Inter-library loan:
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

     

    In C. S. Lewis's Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con, ten articulate defenders and critics of Lewis's apologetics square off and debate the merits of Lewis's central arguments for Christian belief

     
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Source: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Language: English
    Media type: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9789004301252
    Other identifier:
    RVK Categories: HN 5505
    Series: Philosophy and Religion ; 286
    Subjects: Lewis, C. S.; Apologetik;
    Scope: Online-Ressource (272 p)
    Notes:

    Description based upon print version of record

    C. S. Lewis's Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; EDITORIAL FOREWORD; PREFACE; INTRODUCTION: OXFORD'S BONNY APOLOGIST; ONE: Pro: A Defense of C. S. Lewis's Argument from Desire; TWO: Con: Quenching the Argument from Desire; THREE: Reply to Gregory Bassham; FOUR: Reply to Peter Williams; FIVE: Pro: The Argument from Reason Defended; SIX: Con: Naturalism Undefeated; SEVEN: Reply to David Kyle Johnson; EIGHT: Reply to Victor Reppert; NINE: Pro: The Moral Argument is Convincing; TEN: Con: A Critique of the Moral Argument; ELEVEN: Reply to Erik Wielenberg

    TWELVE: Reply to David BaggettTHIRTEEN: Pro: A Defense of C. S. Lewis's "Trilemma"; FOURTEEN: Con: Lewis's Trilemma: Case Not Proven; FIFTEEN: Reply to Adam Barkman; SIXTEEN: Reply to Donald Williams; SEVENTEEN: Pro: The Problem of Pain Defended; EIGHTEEN: Con: C. S. Lewis on Evil: At Best a Likely Story; NINETEEN: Reply to David L. O'Hara; TWENTY: Reply to Philip Tallon; WORKS CITED; THE CONTRIBUTORS; INDEX
  2. C. S. Lewis's Christian Apologetics
    Pro and Con
    Published: 2015
    Publisher:  Brill Rodopi, Leiden

    In C. S. Lewis's Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con, ten articulate defenders and critics of Lewis's apologetics square off and debate the merits of Lewis's central arguments for Christian belief more

    Location:
    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Potsdamer Straße
    Inter-library loan:
    No inter-library loan

     

    In C. S. Lewis's Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con, ten articulate defenders and critics of Lewis's apologetics square off and debate the merits of Lewis's central arguments for Christian belief

     
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Source: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Language: English
    Media type: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9789004301252
    Other identifier:
    RVK Categories: HN 5505
    Series: Philosophy and Religion ; 286
    Subjects: Lewis, C. S.; Apologetik;
    Scope: Online-Ressource (272 p)
    Notes:

    Description based upon print version of record

    C. S. Lewis's Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; EDITORIAL FOREWORD; PREFACE; INTRODUCTION: OXFORD'S BONNY APOLOGIST; ONE: Pro: A Defense of C. S. Lewis's Argument from Desire; TWO: Con: Quenching the Argument from Desire; THREE: Reply to Gregory Bassham; FOUR: Reply to Peter Williams; FIVE: Pro: The Argument from Reason Defended; SIX: Con: Naturalism Undefeated; SEVEN: Reply to David Kyle Johnson; EIGHT: Reply to Victor Reppert; NINE: Pro: The Moral Argument is Convincing; TEN: Con: A Critique of the Moral Argument; ELEVEN: Reply to Erik Wielenberg

    TWELVE: Reply to David BaggettTHIRTEEN: Pro: A Defense of C. S. Lewis's "Trilemma"; FOURTEEN: Con: Lewis's Trilemma: Case Not Proven; FIFTEEN: Reply to Adam Barkman; SIXTEEN: Reply to Donald Williams; SEVENTEEN: Pro: The Problem of Pain Defended; EIGHTEEN: Con: C. S. Lewis on Evil: At Best a Likely Story; NINETEEN: Reply to David L. O'Hara; TWENTY: Reply to Philip Tallon; WORKS CITED; THE CONTRIBUTORS; INDEX
  3. C. S. Lewis's Christian apologetics
    pro and con
    Contributor: Bassham, Gregory (HerausgeberIn)
    Published: 2015
    Publisher:  Brill, Leiden [u.a.]

    Are C. S. Lewis’s major arguments in defense of Christian belief sound? In ‘C. S. Lewis’s Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con’, defenders and critics of Lewis’s apologetics square off and debate the merits of Lewis’s... more

    Location:
    Württembergische Landesbibliothek
    Signature:
    65/17138
    Inter-library loan:
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

     

    Are C. S. Lewis’s major arguments in defense of Christian belief sound? In ‘C. S. Lewis’s Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con’, defenders and critics of Lewis’s apologetics square off and debate the merits of Lewis’s arguments from desire, from reason, from morality, the “trilemma” argument for the divinity of Christ, as well as Lewis’s response to the problem of evil. By means of these lively, in-depth debates, readers will emerge with a deeper understanding and appreciation of today’s most influential Christian apologist

     
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Contributor: Bassham, Gregory (HerausgeberIn)
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Print
    ISBN: 9789004301252
    Other identifier:
    9789004301252
    Series: Array ; Vol. 286
    Subjects: Lewis, C. S.; Apologetik; Christliche Philosophie;
    Scope: XI, 272 S.