Narrow Search
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 6 of 6.

  1. Sanskrit debate
    Vasubandhu's Vimsatika versus Kumarila's Niralambanavada
    Published: 2015; © 2015
    Publisher:  Peter Lang, New York, New York

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9781433117589; 9781453908235
    Series: South Asian Literature, Arts, and Culture Studies ; Volume 2
    Subjects: Consciousness; Object (Philosophy); Philosophy, Indic; Philosophie; Sanskrit; Englisch; Übersetzung
    Other subjects: Kumārila (600-660): Ślokavārttika; Vasubandhu (ca. 4. Jh.): Viṃśatiká
    Scope: 1 online resource (152 pages)
    Notes:

    Description based on print version record

  2. Sanskrit Debate
    Vasubandhu's "Vīmśatikā</I> versus Kumārila's "Nirālambanavāda</I>
    Published: 2015
    Publisher:  Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers, New York

    Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9781453908235
    Other identifier:
    9781453908235
    Edition: 1st, New ed
    Subjects: Sanskrit; Englisch; Philosophie; Übersetzung
    Other subjects: Kumārila (600-660): Ślokavārttika; Vasubandhu (ca. 4. Jh.): Viṃśatiká
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (148 Seiten)
    Notes:

    Online resource; title from title screen (viewed June 10, 2019)

    Sanskrit Debate: Vasubandhu's 'Vīmśatikā' versus Kumārila's 'Nirālambanavāda' illustrates the rules and regulations of classical Indian debate literature (pramānaśāstra) by introducing new translations of two Sanskrit texts composed in antithesis to each other's tradition of thought and practice. In the third century CE, Vasubandhu, a Buddhist philosopher-monk, proposed that the entire world of lived experience is a matter of mind only through his Vīmśatikā (Twenty Verses). In the seventh century CE, Kumārila, a Hindu philosopher-priest, composed Nirālambanavāda (Non-Sensory Limit Debate) to establish the objective reality of objects by refuting Vasubandhu's claim that objects experienced in waking life are not different from objects experienced in dreams. Kumārila rigorously employs formal rules and regulations of Indian logic and debate to demonstrate that Vasubandhu's assertion is totally irrational and incoherent. Vīmśatikā ranks among the world's most misunderstood texts but Kumārila's historic refutation allows Vīmśatikā to be read in its own text-historical context. This compelling, radically revolutionary re-reading of Vīmśatikā delineates a hermeneutic of humor indispensable to discerning its medicinal message. In Vīmśatikā, Vasubandhu employs the form of professional Sanskrit logic and debate as a guise and a ruse to ridicule the entire enterprise of Indian philosophy. Vasubandhu critiques all Indian theories of epistemology and ontology and claims that both how we know and what we know are acts of the imagination

  3. Sanskrit Debate
    Vasubandhu's Vīmśatikā versus Kumārila's Nirālambanvāda
    Published: [2015]
    Publisher:  Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers, New York

    Sanskrit Debate: Vasubandhu’s ‘Vimsatika’ versus Kumarila’s ‘Niralambanavada’ illustrates the rules and regulations of classical Indian debate literature (pramanasastra) by introducing new translations of two Sanskrit texts composed in antithesis to... more

    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Potsdamer Straße
    No inter-library loan

     

    Sanskrit Debate: Vasubandhu’s ‘Vimsatika’ versus Kumarila’s ‘Niralambanavada’ illustrates the rules and regulations of classical Indian debate literature (pramanasastra) by introducing new translations of two Sanskrit texts composed in antithesis to each other’s tradition of thought and practice. In the third century CE, Vasubandhu, a Buddhist philosopher-monk, proposed that the entire world of lived experience is a matter of mind only through his Vimsatika (Twenty Verses). In the seventh century CE, Kumarila, a Hindu philosopher-priest, composed Niralambanavada (Non-Sensory Limit Debate) to establish the objective reality of objects by refuting Vasubandhu’s claim that objects experienced in waking life are not different from objects experienced in dreams. Kumarila rigorously employs formal rules and regulations of Indian logic and debate to demonstrate that Vasubandhu’s assertion is totally irrational and incoherent. Vimsatika ranks among the world’s most misunderstood texts but Kumarila’s historic refutation allows Vimsatika to be read in its own text-historical context. This compelling, radically revolutionary re-reading of Vimsatika delineates a hermeneutic of humor indispensable to discerning its medicinal message. In Vimsatika, Vasubandhu employs the form of professional Sanskrit logic and debate as a guise and a ruse to ridicule the entire enterprise of Indian philosophy. Vasubandhu critiques all Indian theories of epistemology and ontology and claims that both how we know and what we know are acts of the imagination Contents: Classical Indian Philosophy – Vimsatika and Auto-Commentary in Text-Historical Context – Translation of Vimsatika and Auto-Commentary – Niralambanavada in Text–Historical Context – Translation of Niralambanavada – The Verdict

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
    Source: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Language: English
    Media type: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9781453908235
    Other identifier:
    9781453908235
    Edition: 1st, New ed
    Series: South Asian Literature, Arts, and Culture Studies ; 2
    Subjects: Vasubandhu; Kumārila; Übersetzung; Englisch; ; Sanskrit; Philosophie; Geschichte 300-700; ; Indische Philosophie; Bewusstsein; ; Vasubandhu; Kumārila;
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (138 Seiten)
  4. Sanskrit Debate
    Vasubandhu's Vīmśatikā versus Kumārila's Nirālambanvāda
    Published: [2015]
    Publisher:  Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers, New York

    Sanskrit Debate: Vasubandhu’s ‘Vimsatika’ versus Kumarila’s ‘Niralambanavada’ illustrates the rules and regulations of classical Indian debate literature (pramanasastra) by introducing new translations of two Sanskrit texts composed in antithesis to... more

    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Unter den Linden
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan

     

    Sanskrit Debate: Vasubandhu’s ‘Vimsatika’ versus Kumarila’s ‘Niralambanavada’ illustrates the rules and regulations of classical Indian debate literature (pramanasastra) by introducing new translations of two Sanskrit texts composed in antithesis to each other’s tradition of thought and practice. In the third century CE, Vasubandhu, a Buddhist philosopher-monk, proposed that the entire world of lived experience is a matter of mind only through his Vimsatika (Twenty Verses). In the seventh century CE, Kumarila, a Hindu philosopher-priest, composed Niralambanavada (Non-Sensory Limit Debate) to establish the objective reality of objects by refuting Vasubandhu’s claim that objects experienced in waking life are not different from objects experienced in dreams. Kumarila rigorously employs formal rules and regulations of Indian logic and debate to demonstrate that Vasubandhu’s assertion is totally irrational and incoherent. Vimsatika ranks among the world’s most misunderstood texts but Kumarila’s historic refutation allows Vimsatika to be read in its own text-historical context. This compelling, radically revolutionary re-reading of Vimsatika delineates a hermeneutic of humor indispensable to discerning its medicinal message. In Vimsatika, Vasubandhu employs the form of professional Sanskrit logic and debate as a guise and a ruse to ridicule the entire enterprise of Indian philosophy. Vasubandhu critiques all Indian theories of epistemology and ontology and claims that both how we know and what we know are acts of the imagination Contents: Classical Indian Philosophy – Vimsatika and Auto-Commentary in Text-Historical Context – Translation of Vimsatika and Auto-Commentary – Niralambanavada in Text–Historical Context – Translation of Niralambanavada – The Verdict

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
    Source: Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
    Language: English
    Media type: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9781453908235
    Other identifier:
    9781453908235
    Edition: 1st, New ed
    Series: South Asian Literature, Arts, and Culture Studies ; 2
    Subjects: Vasubandhu; Kumārila; Übersetzung; Englisch; ; Sanskrit; Philosophie; Geschichte 300-700; ; Indische Philosophie; Bewusstsein; ; Vasubandhu; Kumārila;
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (138 Seiten)
  5. Sanskrit Debate
    Published: 2015
    Publisher:  Peter Lang Inc., New York ; Peter Lang International Academic Publishers, Bern

    Sanskrit Debate: Vasubandhu’s ‘Vīmśatikā’ versus Kumārila’s ‘Nirālambanavāda’ illustrates the rules and regulations of classical Indian debate literature (pramānaśāstra) by introducing new translations of two Sanskrit texts composed in antithesis to... more

    Access:
    Universitätsbibliothek Gießen
    No inter-library loan
    Universität Marburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    No inter-library loan

     

    Sanskrit Debate: Vasubandhu’s ‘Vīmśatikā’ versus Kumārila’s ‘Nirālambanavāda’ illustrates the rules and regulations of classical Indian debate literature (pramānaśāstra) by introducing new translations of two Sanskrit texts composed in antithesis to each other’s tradition of thought and practice. In the third century CE, Vasubandhu, a Buddhist philosopher-monk, proposed that the entire world of lived experience is a matter of mind only through his Vīmśatikā (Twenty Verses). In the seventh century CE, Kumārila, a Hindu philosopher-priest, composed Nirālambanavāda (Non-Sensory Limit Debate) to establish the objective reality of objects by refuting Vasubandhu’s claim that objects experienced in waking life are not different from objects experienced in dreams. Kumārila rigorously employs formal rules and regulations of Indian logic and debate to demonstrate that Vasubandhu’s assertion is totally irrational and incoherent. Vīmśatikā ranks among the world’s most misunderstood texts but Kumārila’s historic refutation allows Vīmśatikā to be read in its own text-historical context. This compelling, radically revolutionary re-reading of Vīmśatikā delineates a hermeneutic of humor indispensable to discerning its medicinal message. In Vīmśatikā, Vasubandhu employs the form of professional Sanskrit logic and debate as a guise and a ruse to ridicule the entire enterprise of Indian philosophy. Vasubandhu critiques all Indian theories of epistemology and ontology and claims that both how we know and what we know are acts of the imagination.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9781453908235
    Other identifier:
    DDC Categories: 100
    Edition: 1st, New ed.
    Series: South Asian Literature ; 2
    Subjects: Übersetzung; Englisch; Sanskrit; Philosophie
    Other subjects: Vasubandhu (4. Jh.): Viṃśatiká; Kumārila (600-660): Ślokavārttika
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource
  6. Sanskrit Debate
    Vasubandhu’s Vīmśatikā versus Kumārila’s Nirālambanavāda
    Published: 2015
    Publisher:  Peter Lang Publishing Inc., New York

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9781453908235
    Other identifier:
    9781453908235
    Series: South Asian Literature, Arts, and Culture Studies ; 2
    Subjects: Übersetzung; Englisch; Sanskrit; Philosophie
    Other subjects: Vasubandhu der Jüngere (400-480): Viṃśatiká; Kumārila (600-660): Ślokavārttika; (Produktform)Electronic book text; (Zielgruppe)Fachpublikum/ Wissenschaft; (VLB-WN)9541; (BISAC Subject Heading)PHI000000; (BIC Subject Heading)HPD
    Scope: Online-Ressource
    Notes:

    Lizenzpflichtig