Narrow Search
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 3 of 3.

  1. Impossible Individuality
    Romanticism, Revolution, and the Origins of Modern Selfhood, 1787-1802
    Published: 1992
    Publisher:  Princeton University Press, Princeton ; ProQuest, Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Studying major writers and philosophers--Schlegel and Schleiermacher in Germany, Wordsworth in England, and Chateaubriand in France--Gerald Izenberg shows how a combination of political, social, and psychological developments resulted in the modern... more

    Universität Frankfurt, Elektronische Ressourcen
    /
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Gießen
    No inter-library loan
    Universität Mainz, Zentralbibliothek
    No inter-library loan

     

    Studying major writers and philosophers--Schlegel and Schleiermacher in Germany, Wordsworth in England, and Chateaubriand in France--Gerald Izenberg shows how a combination of political, social, and psychological developments resulted in the modern concept of selfhood. More than a study of one national culture influencing another, this work goes to the heart of kindred intellectual processes in three European countries. Izenberg makes two persuasive and related arguments. The first is that the Romantics developed a new idea of the self as characterized by fundamentally opposing impulses: a drive to assert the authority of the self and expand that authority to absorb the universe, and the contradictory impulse to surrender to a greater idealized entity as the condition of the self's infinity. The second argument seeks to explain these paradoxes historically, showing how romantic individuality emerged as a compromise. Izenberg demonstrates how the Romantics retreated, in part, from a preliminary, radically activist ideal of autonomy they had worked out under the impact of the French Revolution. They had begun by seeing the individual self as the sole source of meaning and authority, but the convergence of crises in their personal lives with the crises of the revolution revealed this ideal as dangerously aggressive and self-aggrandizing. In reaction, the Romantics shifted their absolute claims for the self to the realm of creativity and imagination, and made such claims less dangerous by attributing totality to nature, art, lover, or state, which in return gave that totality back to the self.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9781400820665
    RVK Categories: EC 5166 ; EC 5167
    Subjects: Romantik; Individualität; Philosophie; Totalität; Schriftsteller; Politische Philosophie; Geschichtsbild
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (367 pages)
    Notes:

    Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources

  2. Impossible Individuality
    Romanticism, Revolution, and the Origins of Modern Selfhood, 1787-1802
    Published: 1992; ©1992
    Publisher:  Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Main description: Studying major writers and philosophers--Schlegel and Schleiermacher in Germany, Wordsworth in England, and Chateaubriand in France--Gerald Izenberg shows how a combination of political, social, and psychological developments... more

    Hochschule für Gesundheit, Hochschulbibliothek
    Initiative E-Books.NRW
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Braunschweig
    No inter-library loan
    Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen
    No inter-library loan
    Zentrale Hochschulbibliothek Flensburg
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Greifswald
    No inter-library loan
    HafenCity Universität Hamburg, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg, Hochschulinformations- und Bibliotheksservice (HIBS), Fachbibliothek Technik, Wirtschaft, Informatik
    No inter-library loan
    Technische Universität Hamburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Bibliothek - Niedersächsische Landesbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Hildesheim
    No inter-library loan
    Thüringer Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Kiel, Zentralbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Medien- und Informationszentrum, Universitätsbibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Universitätsbibliothek
    ebook deGruyter
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschule Merseburg, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Bibliotheks-und Informationssystem der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (BIS)
    No inter-library loan
    Bibliotheks-und Informationssystem der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (BIS)
    No inter-library loan
    Jade Hochschule Wilhelmshaven/Oldenburg/Elsfleth, Campus Oldenburg, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Jade Hochschule Wilhelmshaven/Oldenburg/Elsfleth, Campus Elsfleth, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek Osnabrück
    No inter-library loan
    Hochschulbibliothek Pforzheim, Bereichsbibliothek Technik und Wirtschaft
    eBook de Gruyter
    No inter-library loan
    Universitätsbibliothek der Eberhard Karls Universität
    No loan of volumes, only paper copies will be sent
    Jade Hochschule Wilhelmshaven/Oldenburg/Elsfleth, Campus Wilhelmshaven, Bibliothek
    No inter-library loan

     

    Main description: Studying major writers and philosophers--Schlegel and Schleiermacher in Germany, Wordsworth in England, and Chateaubriand in France--Gerald Izenberg shows how a combination of political, social, and psychological developments resulted in the modern concept of selfhood. More than a study of one national culture influencing another, this work goes to the heart of kindred intellectual processes in three European countries. Izenberg makes two persuasive and related arguments. The first is that the Romantics developed a new idea of the self as characterized by fundamentally opposing impulses: a drive to assert the authority of the self and expand that authority to absorb the universe, and the contradictory impulse to surrender to a greater idealized entity as the condition of the self's infinity. The second argument seeks to explain these paradoxes historically, showing how romantic individuality emerged as a compromise. Izenberg demonstrates how the Romantics retreated, in part, from a preliminary, radically activist ideal of autonomy they had worked out under the impact of the French Revolution. They had begun by seeing the individual self as the sole source of meaning and authority, but the convergence of crises in their personal lives with the crises of the revolution revealed this ideal as dangerously aggressive and self-aggrandizing. In reaction, the Romantics shifted their absolute claims for the self to the realm of creativity and imagination, and made such claims less dangerous by attributing totality to nature, art, lover, or state, which in return gave that totality back to the self.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Content information
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9781400820665
    Other identifier:
    9781400820665
    Subjects: Self in literature; Romanticism; Literature and revolutions; LITERARY CRITICISM
    Scope: Online-Ressource (372 S.)
  3. Impossible Individuality
    Romanticism, Revolution, and the Origins of Modern Selfhood, 1787-1802
    Published: 1992
    Publisher:  Princeton University Press, Princeton ; ProQuest, Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Studying major writers and philosophers--Schlegel and Schleiermacher in Germany, Wordsworth in England, and Chateaubriand in France--Gerald Izenberg shows how a combination of political, social, and psychological developments resulted in the modern... more

    Universität Frankfurt, Elektronische Ressourcen
    /
    No inter-library loan

     

    Studying major writers and philosophers--Schlegel and Schleiermacher in Germany, Wordsworth in England, and Chateaubriand in France--Gerald Izenberg shows how a combination of political, social, and psychological developments resulted in the modern concept of selfhood. More than a study of one national culture influencing another, this work goes to the heart of kindred intellectual processes in three European countries. Izenberg makes two persuasive and related arguments. The first is that the Romantics developed a new idea of the self as characterized by fundamentally opposing impulses: a drive to assert the authority of the self and expand that authority to absorb the universe, and the contradictory impulse to surrender to a greater idealized entity as the condition of the self's infinity. The second argument seeks to explain these paradoxes historically, showing how romantic individuality emerged as a compromise. Izenberg demonstrates how the Romantics retreated, in part, from a preliminary, radically activist ideal of autonomy they had worked out under the impact of the French Revolution. They had begun by seeing the individual self as the sole source of meaning and authority, but the convergence of crises in their personal lives with the crises of the revolution revealed this ideal as dangerously aggressive and self-aggrandizing. In reaction, the Romantics shifted their absolute claims for the self to the realm of creativity and imagination, and made such claims less dangerous by attributing totality to nature, art, lover, or state, which in return gave that totality back to the self.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Specialised Catalogue of Comparative Literature
    Language: English
    Media type: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9781400820665
    RVK Categories: EC 5166 ; EC 5167
    Subjects: Romantik; Individualität; Philosophie; Totalität; Schriftsteller; Politische Philosophie; Geschichtsbild
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (367 pages)
    Notes:

    Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources