Narrow Search
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 4 of 4.

  1. How curtailment affects the spatial allocation of variable renewable electricity
    what are the drivers and welfare effects?
    Published: [2023]
    Publisher:  Institute of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne (EWI), Köln, Germany

    Variable renewable electricity (VRE), generated for instance by wind or solar power plants, is characterised by negligible variable costs and an availability that varies over time and space. Locating VRE capacity at sites with the highest average... more

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DS 5
    No inter-library loan

     

    Variable renewable electricity (VRE), generated for instance by wind or solar power plants, is characterised by negligible variable costs and an availability that varies over time and space. Locating VRE capacity at sites with the highest average availability maximises the potential output. However, potential output must be curtailed, if system constraints prevent a local use or export. Such system constraints arise from the features defining the system, which I denote as system topology. Therefore, site choices that are unfavourable from a potential output perspective may still be optimal from a total system cost perspective. Previous research has shown that first-best investments require nodal prices that take account of the system constraints. Market designs that do not reflect nodal prices, such as uniform pricing, typically fail to achieve optimal site choices. However, a profound theoretical understanding of the economic trade-offs involved in the optimal spatial allocation of VRE is lacking. My paper contributes to filling this research gap. To do so, I develop a highly stylised model in which producers, taking into account the system topology, allocate VRE capacity in a one-shot game. Using the model, I analytically show that the optimal spatial allocation can be grouped into three spatial allocation ranges. Which of these ranges applies, I find to be highly dependent on the system topology parameters. In the first range, valid for relatively low VRE penetration levels, it is optimal to allocate all capacity to the node with the higher average availability. In the second and third range, it is optimal to allocate marginal capacity either fully or partially to the node with the lower average availability, i.e., the less favourable site from a potential output perspective. For uniform pricing, I show that producers allocate capacity inefficiently when VRE penetration exceeds a certain threshold. The resulting welfare losses I find to be especially high when transmission capacity is low, the difference in average VRE availability is large, and demand is concentrated at the node with the lower availability.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/286375
    Series: EWI working paper ; no 23, 02 (März 2023)
    Subjects: variable renewable electricity; spatial allocation; nodal pricing; uniform pricing; theoretical analysis
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 48 Seiten), Illustrationen
  2. Internal and external effects of pricing short-term gas transmission capacity via multipliers
    Published: June 2021
    Publisher:  Institute of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne (EWI), Köln, Germany

    In the European Union's (EU) gas transmission system the relative prices of short-term transmission capacities are specified via factors called multipliers. Previous literature indicates that, depending on the region, there exist optimal multiplier... more

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DS 5
    No inter-library loan

     

    In the European Union's (EU) gas transmission system the relative prices of short-term transmission capacities are specified via factors called multipliers. Previous literature indicates that, depending on the region, there exist optimal multiplier levels that can allow transport tariffs to be reduced and consumer surplus to be maximised. However, since multiplier levels in a region can cause externalities in other regions, it is not clear if individually optimal multipliers in regions would also lead to a joint optimum. In order to provide insight into optimal multiplier levels in different regions in the EU we use a numerical optimisation model to simulate the European gas dispatch. We analyse the effects of multipliers in regional clusters; identify and differentiate between internal and external effects. We show that those effects and the individually optimal multiplier levels vary among regions depending on factors such as demand structure and storage availability. Our analysis confirms that individually adjusting multipliers in a region can cause external effects in other regions, depending largely on the location along the gas transport chain. With 92 million EUR per year, the potential EU consumer surplus gains with individually optimal multipliers is found to be 9% lower than the maximum achievable EU consumer surplus gains via multipliers. Hence, we show that because of the external effects of multipliers, individually optimal multipliers do not result in the EU optimum.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/244338
    Series: EWI working paper ; no 21, 04 (March 2021)
    Subjects: gas transmission networks; entry-exit tariffs; multipliers; numerical optimisation model
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 43 Seiten), Illustrationen
  3. Complementing carbon prices with carbon contracts for difference in the presence of risk
    when is it beneficial and when not?
    Published: [2021]
    Publisher:  Institute of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne (EWI), Köln, Germany

    Deep decarbonisation requires large-scale irreversible investments throughout the next decade. Policymakers discuss Carbon Contracts for Differences (CCfDs) to incentivise such investments in the industry sector. CCfDs are contracts between a... more

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DS 5
    No inter-library loan

     

    Deep decarbonisation requires large-scale irreversible investments throughout the next decade. Policymakers discuss Carbon Contracts for Differences (CCfDs) to incentivise such investments in the industry sector. CCfDs are contracts between a regulator and a firm that pay out the difference between a guaranteed strikeprice and the actual carbon price per emission reduction generated by an investment of the firm. We develop an analytical model to assess the welfare effects of CCfDs and compare it to other carbon pricing regimes. In our model, a regulator can offer CCfDs to risk-averse firms that decide upon irreversible investments into an emission-free technology in the presence of risk. Risk can originate from the environmental damage or the variable costs of the emission-free technology. We find that a CCfD can be a beneficial policy instrument as it hedges firms’ risk encouraging investments when the firms’ risk aversion would otherwise inhibit this. In contrast to mitigating firms’ risk by committing to a carbon price early on, CCfDs maintain the regulator’s flexibility to adjust the carbon price if new information reveals. However, as CCfDs hedge the firms’ revenues, they might safeguard production with the emission-free technology, even if it is ex-post inefficient. In this case, regulatory flexibility can be welfare superior to offering a CCfD.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/249183
    Series: EWI working paper ; no 21, 09 (November 2021)
    Subjects: Climate policy; carbon pricing; risk; Carbon Contracts for Difference
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 47 Seiten), Illustrationen
  4. Pricing short-term gas transmission capacity
    a theoretical approach to understand the diverse effects of the multiplier system
    Published: [August 2020]
    Publisher:  Institute of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne (EWI), Köln, Germany

    In the European Union’s (EU) gas transmission system, transporting gas requires the booking of transmission capacities. For this purpose, long-term and short-term capacity products are offered. Short-term capacities are priced by multiplying... more

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DS 5
    No inter-library loan

     

    In the European Union’s (EU) gas transmission system, transporting gas requires the booking of transmission capacities. For this purpose, long-term and short-term capacity products are offered. Short-term capacities are priced by multiplying long-term capacity tariffs with factors called multipliers, making them comparably more expensive. As such, the level of multipliers directly affects how capacity is booked and may significantly impact infrastructure utilisation and welfare - an issue that has not received attention in the literature so far. Using a theoretical approach, we show that multipliers equal to 1 minimise costs and maximise welfare.In contrast, higher multipliers are associated with decreasing welfare. Yet, policymakers may favour higher multipliers, as we find that multipliers greater than 1 but sufficiently low can maximise consumer surplus by leading to reduced hub prices and lower regional price spreads on average. These findings are expected to hold for the large majority of the EU countries. Nevertheless, we also identify situations in which capacity demand can become inelastic depending on the proportion of multipliers with respect to the relative cost of transmission versus storage. In such cases, varying multipliers are found to have no effect on infrastructure utilisation, prices and welfare.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/227506
    Series: EWI working paper ; no 20, 02 (August 2020)
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 47 Seiten), Illustrationen