Narrow Search
Last searches

Results for *

Displaying results 1 to 4 of 4.

  1. Wem gehört die biologische Vielfalt?
    eine kurze Darstellung der Debatte über die Verfügungsrechte an der biologischen Vielfalt
    Published: 2000
    Publisher:  Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, Berlin

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: German
    Media type: Book
    Format: Print
    RVK Categories: QT 000 ; QT 000
    DDC Categories: 340; 360
    Edition: 1. Aufl.
    Series: Studien und Berichte der Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung ; Nr. 4
    Subjects: Biodiversität; Genetische Ressourcen; Immaterialgüterrecht; Pflanzenschutz; Sachenrecht
    Other subjects: (stw)Artenvielfalt; (stw)Immaterialgüterrechte; (stw)Pflanzenschutz; (stw)Sachenrecht; (stw)Welt; Graue Literatur; Buch
    Scope: 26 S., 30 cm
  2. Ostracism and theft in heterogeneous groups
    Published: [2021]
    Publisher:  Research platform Empirical and Experimental Economics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Ostracism, or exclusion by peers, has been practiced since ancient times as a severe form of punishment against transgressors of laws or social norms. The purpose of this paper is to offer a comprehensive analysis on how ostracism affects behavior... more

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DS 395
    No inter-library loan

     

    Ostracism, or exclusion by peers, has been practiced since ancient times as a severe form of punishment against transgressors of laws or social norms. The purpose of this paper is to offer a comprehensive analysis on how ostracism affects behavior and the functioning of a social group. We present data from a laboratory experiment, in which participants face a social dilemma on how to allocate limited resources between a productive activity and theft, and are given the opportunity to exclude members of their group by means of majority voting. Our main treatment features an environment with heterogeneity in productivity within groups, thus creating inequalities in economic opportunities and income. We find that exclusion is an effective form of punishment and decreases theft by excluded members once they are re-admitted into the group. However, it also leads to some retaliation by low-productivity members. A particularly worrisome aspect of exclusion is that punished group members are stigmatized and have a higher probability of facing exclusion again. We discuss implications of our findings for penal systems and their capacity to rehabilitate prisoners.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/240447
    Edition: This version: 22.06.2021
    Series: Working papers in economics and statistics ; 2021, 19
    Subjects: ostracism; social dilemma; theft; rehabilitation; heterogeneous groups
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 47 Seiten), Illustrationen
  3. Substitution of social concerns under the Covid-19 pandemic
    Published: [2020]
    Publisher:  Research platform Empirical and Experimental Economics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Think tanks and political leaders have raised concerns about the implications that the Covid-19 response and reconstruction might have on other social objectives that were setting the international agenda before the Covid-19 pandemic. We present... more

    Access:
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Verlag (kostenfrei)
    Resolving-System (kostenfrei)
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    DS 395
    No inter-library loan

     

    Think tanks and political leaders have raised concerns about the implications that the Covid-19 response and reconstruction might have on other social objectives that were setting the international agenda before the Covid-19 pandemic. We present experimental evidence for eight consecutive weeks during April-May 2020 for Austria, testing the extent to which Covid-19 concerns might substitute other social concerns such as the climate crisis or the protection of vulnerable sectors of the society. We measure behavior in a simple donation task where participants receive e3 that they can distribute between themselves and different charities. While participants in one treatment have the opportunity to donate, if any, to eight different charities including a rich set of social concerns (Baseline), participants in a second treatment can choose to donate, if any, to the same charities and, in addition, to the Covid-19 Solidarity Response Fund for the World Health Organization (Covid-19). In a third treatment, participants can only decide on distributing the e3 between themselves and the Covid-19 Solidarity Response Fund (Covid-19 Only). Our results show that introducing the Covid-19 Solidarity Response Fund does not significantly change aggregate donations (donations represent 76.3% of endowment in Baseline and 70.2% in Covid-19, t(584) = 1.938, p = 0.053, n = 585). But, given positive donations to the Covid19 Solidarity Response Fund, this entails significantly lower donations to the other eight charities (76.3% in Baseline and 60.8% in Covid-19, t(584) = 5.868, p < 0.001, n = 585). Moreover, our results point to a high support to the WHO Covid-19 Fund: In the treatment where the WHO Covid-19 Fund is the only available recipient, participants donate about 50% of their endowment (Covid-19 Only), while in the treatment where it is one out of nine recipients, donations are still 9.5% of endowment (Covid-19) . Overall, our results indicate that donations to diverse social concerns are partially substituted by donations to the Covid-19 fund; yet, this substitution is far from replacing all other social concerns. 6556 Charitable donation.

     

    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: English
    Media type: Book
    Format: Online
    Other identifier:
    hdl: 10419/238254
    Series: Working papers in economics and statistics ; 2020, 30
    Scope: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 35 Seiten), Illustrationen
  4. Wem gehört die biologische Vielfalt?
    eine kurze Darstellung der Debatte über die Verfügungsrechte an der biologischen Vielfalt
    Published: 2000
    Publisher:  Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, Berlin

    Leibniz-Zentrum für Marine Tropenforschung (ZMT) GmbH, Bibliothek
    BIO Tap 1
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen
    C-11.546
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Standort Kiel
    C 227458
    Unlimited inter-library loan, copies and loan
    Export to reference management software   RIS file
      BibTeX file
    Source: Union catalogues
    Language: German
    Media type: Book
    Format: Print
    RVK Categories: QT 000
    Series: Studien & Berichte der Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung ; 4
    Subjects: Artenvielfalt; Immaterialgüterrechte; Pflanzenschutz; Sachenrecht; Welt
    Scope: 26 S