Becoming Ahuman (Journal for the Study of British Cultures 2023)

Special Issue of the Journal for the Study of British Cultures (2023)

Guest Editors:Ariane de Waal (Halle-Wittenberg) and Mark Schmitt (Dortmund)
 

Everyone is talking about the future, but what if there is none for humans? As Jennifer Gidley writes, “[t]he future we face today is one that threatens our very existence as a species. It threatens the comfortable urban lifestyles that many of us hold dear and the habitability of the earth itself […]. The impact of climate crisis alone is pointing to frightening futures” (Gidley 2017: 1). What does it mean to live as part of the human species in these frightening times? And more importantly, what does it mean to recognise the devastating impact that the human species itself has on the potential futures of its fellow species and the entire planet? Timothy Morton has argued for a “logic of future coexistence” that is based on radically deconstructing anthropocentric modes of thinking, living and knowing the world (2016). In her provocative Ahuman Manifesto, Patricia MacCormack goes even further and urges her fellow humans to reject “human privilege” and actively engage in an “ahuman […] becoming-other” (2020: 15). In practical terms, MacCormack’s project of becoming ahuman involves drastically reducing one’s impact on the planet and nonhuman life forms by, among others, going vegan, refusing to reproduce and embracing the prospect of passive human extinction. Her Deleuze-Guattarian approach to becoming-other entails thinking about the ahuman as an active, yet always incomplete process, a potentiality, a practice of prefiguration. Addressing a different set of questions surrounding the agency of speculative capital and algorithmic processes, J. Paul Narkunas comes to a similar conclusion in Reified Life (2018): against the predominant focus on posthuman futures, he argues that the contingencies of human lives and practices at the current critical junction are best captured by the category of the ahuman.

In this special issue, we want to address this notion of becoming ahuman by investigating its implications for the study of British cultures and discourses. We want to ask who and what takes part in such a becoming, and what does it take/require? How do we, to follow Eugene Thacker (2011, 2015a, 2015b), think the world-without-us rather than the world-for-us? Is a future coexistence possible or even desirable or should we succumb to a “cosmic pessimism” (Thacker 2015c)? In the wake of the frequently proclaimed posthuman turn, writing on the Anthropocene often salvages a sense of (cruel?) optimism by envisioning new cross-species constellations (Haraway 2016) or nomadic reconfigurations of the Euro- and androcentric humanities in terms of the “critical posthumanities” (Braidotti 2018). These suggestions have doubtlessly spawned imaginative (and often provocative) explorations of the radically decentred position humans might occupy once they decide to “Make Kin Not Babies!” (Haraway 2016: 102). The project of becoming ahuman does not share the same hope regarding future (post)human potentialities. The generative potential of becoming ahuman, instead, is realised in an irrevocably damaged present: acknowledging that human lives need not necessarily be prolonged or saved, ahuman becomings accept “terminality” (Ensor 2016). And yet, affirmative stances on human extinction do not inevitably lead to apolitical apathy or despair. As recent novels, nonfiction, manifestos, podcasts, plays, poems and films  as well as protest movements and public debates evince, prefigurations of ahuman becomings can be as comforting as they are agitating, as joyful as they are provocative, as rewarding as they are challenging.

This special issue for the Journal for the Study of British Cultures seeks to examine the swiftly expanding discursive space surrounding human extinction, non-reproductivity and futures-without-us in the UK. Challenging us to reorient our affective energies and political investments towards a terminal present, the British cultural responses and representations that we wish to collate, discuss and problematise in this special issue resituate the human on the route(s) of becoming ahuman. We invite contributions that pick up on or extend the following questions: 

• Where do ahuman aspects take shape in British culture?
• How is ahuman advocacy defended or contested in UK public discourse, and which wider cultural issues are navigated through these debates?
• How do recent British cultural representations interrogate the epistemological frames of the Anthropocene (“the world-for-us” vs. “the world-without-us”, cf. Thacker 2011: 4-5), for instance in popular genre fiction such as horror and science fiction, in (youth) subcultures such as rap, punk (“No Future”) and the thanatopoetics of British black metal?
• What kind of future can be thought once the possibility of human life on the planet is abandoned?
• What does the philosophy of becoming-other have to offer for British cultural projects that turn away from a vitalist focus on life and from hopes of prolonging human existence?
• How do queer negations of reproductive futurism (cf. Edelman 2004) resonate with an ahuman perspective?
• Could the category of the ahuman support critical discussions of human reproduction in the UK (“Being Childfree”, BirthStrike), while steering clear of a simplistic focus on overpopulation or neo-Malthusian subtexts?
• To what extent can the dedication of climate activism (Extinction Rebellion, Fridays for Future) to an idea of saving the future be read in terms of a cruelly optimistic attachment (cf. Berlant 2011)?
• What could alternative affective, creative or imaginative relationships to an ahuman present and uncertain future look like?

We welcome proposals for contributions focusing on any of these aspects of “becoming ahuman.” Please submit abstracts of 400-500 words and a short bio note to the guest editors for this special issue, Ariane de Waal (ariane.de-waal@anglistik.uni-halle.de) and Mark Schmitt (mark.schmitt@tu-dortmund.de) by 01 November 2021. Finished articles (5,000 words) will be due by 01 June 2022.
 

Works Cited

Berlant, Lauren (2011), Cruel Optimism, Durham: Duke University Press.

Braidotti, Rosi (2018), “A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities”, Theory, Culture & Society 36.3, 31-61.

Edelman, Lee (2004), No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive, Durham: Duke University Press.

Ensor, Sarah (2016), “Terminal Regions: Queer Ecocriticism at the End”, in Alastair Hunt & Stephanie Youngblood, eds., Against Life, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 41-61.

Gidley, Jennifer M. (2017), The Future: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haraway, Donna J. (2016), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham: Duke University Press.

MacCormack, Patricia (2020), The Ahuman Manifesto: Activism for the End of the Anthropocene, London: Bloomsbury.

Morton, Timothy (2016), Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence, New York: Columbia University Press.

Narkunas, J. Paul (2018), Reified Life: Speculative Capital and the Ahuman Condition, New York: Fordham University Press.

Thacker, Eugene (2011), In the Dust of This Planet: Horror of Philosophy Vol. 1, London: Zero Books.

--- (2015a), Starry Speculative Corpse: Horror of Philosophy Vol. 2, London: Zero Books.

--- (2015b), Tentacles Longer Than Night: Horror of Philosophy Vol. 3, London: Zero Books.

--- (2015c), Cosmic Pessimism, Minneapolis: Univocal.