Direkt zur Hauptnavigation springen Direkt zum Inhalt springen
info(at)avldigital.remove-this.de
Deutsch English
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Zeige Ergebnisse 26 bis 30 von 30.

  1. Die Branchenstruktur der Markt- und Meinungsforschung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland von 1986 bis 1996
    eine deskriptive Analyse
    Autor*in: Wack, Simone
    Erschienen: 1998
    Verlag:  WZB, Berlin

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
  2. A meeting report: OECD-GESIS Seminar on Translating and Adapting Instruments in Large-Scale Assessments (2018)
    Autor*in: Behr, Dorothée; Zabal, Anouk
    Erschienen: 2019
    Verlag:  SSOAR - Social Science Open Access Repository, Mannheim

    Abstract: This report summarizes the main themes and conclusions from the OECD-GESIS Seminar on Translating and Adapting Instruments in Large-Scale Assessments, which took place at the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),... mehr

     

    Abstract: This report summarizes the main themes and conclusions from the OECD-GESIS Seminar on Translating and Adapting Instruments in Large-Scale Assessments, which took place at the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris, in June 2018. The five sessions covered the topics (1) etic (universal) vs. emic (culture-specific) measurement instruments, (2) language- and culture-sensitive development of measurement instruments, (3) international guidelines vs. implementation in countries and by translators, (4) tools and technological developments, and (5) quality control of translations. Key players in the field presented on best practice, lessons learned, and innovations and also made suggestions for moving the field forward

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/65719
    DDC Klassifikation: Sozialwissenschaften (300)
    Weitere Schlagworte: (thesoz)Umfrageforschung; (thesoz)Messinstrument; (thesoz)Fragebogen; (thesoz)Übersetzung; (thesoz)Test; (thesoz)interkultureller Vergleich; (thesoz)internationaler Vergleich; Adaptation; Comparability; Equivalence; Assessment
    Umfang: Online-Ressource
    Bemerkung(en):

    Veröffentlichungsversion

    begutachtet (peer reviewed)

    In: Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences (2019) ; 1-7
  3. Exploring Language Effects in Crosscultural Survey Research: Does the Language of Administration Affect Answers About Politics?
    Autor*in: Zavala-Rojas, Diana

    Abstract: We study if the language of administration of a survey has an effect on the answers of bilingual respondents to questions measuring political dimensions. This is done in two steps. In the first we test whether the measurement instruments... mehr

     

    Abstract: We study if the language of administration of a survey has an effect on the answers of bilingual respondents to questions measuring political dimensions. This is done in two steps. In the first we test whether the measurement instruments are equivalent for the same individual in two languages. After measurement invariance is established, we test if latent mean differences are significant across the two languages. We also test if the correlation of the same concept in two languages is equal to one or not. Results show evidence for language effects, the latent correlation is below one, although mean differences are not significant. We use data of the LISS migration panel in a within subject design, respondents answer a questionnaire twice first in Dutch and then in their (second) native language among Arabic, English, German, Papiamento and Turkish

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/56027
    Übergeordneter Titel:
    Veröffentlichungsversion
    begutachtet (peer reviewed)
    Enthalten in: Methods, data, analyses; Mannheim : GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, 2014-; 12, Heft 1 (2018), 127-150; Online-Ressource
    DDC Klassifikation: Sozialwissenschaften (300)
    Weitere Schlagworte: (thesoz)Umfrageforschung; (thesoz)interkultureller Vergleich; (thesoz)Mehrsprachigkeit; (thesoz)Antwortverhalten; (thesoz)Meinungsforschung; (thesoz)politische Meinung; (thesoz)Datengewinnung; (thesoz)Korrelation; language effects; bilingualism; measurement equivalence
    Umfang: Online-Ressource
  4. Measurement Instruments in Cross-National Surveys (Version 2.0)
    Autor*in: Behr, Dorothée; Braun, Michael; Dorer, Brita
    Erschienen: 2016

    Abstract: This contribution deals with measurement instruments - that is, questionnaires and individual items - employed in international survey research. By international surveys we mean cross-national comparative studies whose concept,... mehr

     

    Abstract: This contribution deals with measurement instruments - that is, questionnaires and individual items - employed in international survey research. By international surveys we mean cross-national comparative studies whose concept, implementation, and organisation are shaped by the comparability requirement. We begin by focussing on general aspects of the comparability of international surveys. In the case of problems that occur in all surveys - for example sampling-related problems and nonresponse - we refer the reader to the corresponding thematic contributions in the Survey Guidelines and to the literature. We make a distinction between ensuring the comparability of measurement instruments ex-ante and ex-post - that is, before or after the actual survey is, or has been, conducted. Comparability is established ex ante by means of pretests, for example; it is established ex post within the framework of the data analysis or additional studies. We focus in particular on question transla

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/56381
    DDC Klassifikation: Sozialwissenschaften (300)
    Schriftenreihe: GESIS Survey Guidelines
    Weitere Schlagworte: (thesoz)Fragebogen; (thesoz)interkultureller Vergleich; (thesoz)Übersetzung; (thesoz)Messinstrument; (thesoz)Pretest; (thesoz)Qualität; (thesoz)Datengewinnung; (thesoz)Stichprobe; (thesoz)Umfrageforschung
    Umfang: Online-Ressource, 20 S.
    Bemerkung(en):

    Erstveröffentlichung

    begutachtet (peer reviewed)
  5. Methodological Aspects of a Quantitative and Qualitative Survey of Asylum Seekers in Germany - A Field Report
    Autor*in: Haug, Sonja; Lochner, Susanne; Huber, Dominik

    Abstract: This field report presents and discusses methodological issues and challenges encountered in a mixed-methods research project on asylum seekers in Bavaria, Germany. It documents the research design of, and field experiences in, a... mehr

     

    Abstract: This field report presents and discusses methodological issues and challenges encountered in a mixed-methods research project on asylum seekers in Bavaria, Germany. It documents the research design of, and field experiences in, a quantitative survey based on a quota sampling procedure and a qualitative study, both of which were conducted in collective accommodation for asylum seekers at selected locations in that federal state. Standardized PAPI multiple-topic questionnaires were completed by asylum seekers from Syria, Afghanistan, Eritrea, and Iraq (N = 779); most of the questionnaires were self-administered. In addition, 12 qualitative face-to-face biographical interviews were conducted in order to gain an indepth understanding of attitudes and experiences of asylum seekers. This report focuses on the following aspects: the use of gatekeepers to facilitate participant recruitment; sampling procedures; the involvement of interpreters in the data collection process; response bias a

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/63139
    Übergeordneter Titel:
    Veröffentlichungsversion
    begutachtet (peer reviewed)
    Enthalten in: Methods, data, analyses; Mannheim : GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, 2014-; 13, Heft 2 (2019), 321-340; Online-Ressource
    DDC Klassifikation: Sozialwissenschaften (300)
    Weitere Schlagworte: (thesoz)Asylbewerber; (thesoz)Bayern; (thesoz)Bundesrepublik Deutschland; (thesoz)Befragung; (thesoz)Interview; (thesoz)Einstellung; (thesoz)Flucht; (thesoz)Motiv; (thesoz)Wertorientierung; (thesoz)Datengewinnung; (thesoz)Antwortverhalten; (thesoz)Umfrageforschung; mixed methods; surveys; biographical research; gatekeeper approach; methodological issues; use of interpreters
    Umfang: Online-Ressource